No Brakes On Beaverly Brake Check Just Yet
Upset residents pack a public meeting at the Beaverly Fire Rescue Hall last night
Prince George, BC – Angry and concerned Beaverly residents did not get their wish to have a mandatory brake check for commercial vehicles on Highway 16, west of Prince George closed immediately, but Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure officials are looking into the possibility of a temporary closure as they work to address the many issues raised at a two-hour public meeting last night.
Emotions ran high as approximately 90 residents from the rural community – many of them commercial drivers – gathered at the Beaverly Fire Rescue Hall to voice their concerns directly to four reps from MOTI’s District of Fort George office. The as-of-yet unpaved brake check is for eastbound traffic heading into Prince George and is located approximately 14-kilometres west of Peden Hill – it is the only eastbound check between Prince Rupert and Prince George.
In explaining the rationale for the location of the check, ministry officials went over the challenges with sites closer to Prince George, including: limited visibility, the need to re-locate utilities, and, in some cases, the need to acquire property due to limited Right of Way. Fort George District Acting Manager, Trent Folk, said traffic volumes along portions of the 4.5-kilometre stretch that encompasses all of Peden Hill – from Kimball Road to the steep grade down to Range Road – vary from 15-thousand to 40-thousand vehicles per day. He said, while it wasn’t the catalyst for the brake check, the accident that saw a chip truck lose its brakes and careen into the parking lot at Boston Pizza in 2010 "served as a business case" for the need.
The Beaverly check became operational this past winter, and, since then, residents say the site is ‘an accident waiting to happen’ – with the large trucks creating a bottleneck pulling into and out of the check. Residents told first-hand experiences of near-miss, head-on collisions as aggressive drivers in passenger vehicles pull into the westbound lane to get around the slower trucks. They say it is responsible for at least two crashes.
Beaverly Community Association President, Rhonda Girard, spoke for many in the room when she talked about the noise from the check stop making it impossible for nearby residents to get a full night’s sleep. The brake check sits a few hundred metres east of the fire hall and chief Bruce Perrin said with many of his volunteer department’s members living to the east of the check, there is a real danger they may be unable to access their equipment in the event of an emergency. Perrin said, as it stands now, it’s often unsafe for members to get into the hall for their Tuesday evening practises.
Area resident, Ray Brochu, conducted his own survey and monitored the check for a total of two-hours and 30-minutes over six days at the end of May and earlier this month. He told the crowd that of the 107 eastbound commercial vehicles he saw: 1. 24 did not stop at the check, 2. of the 83 others: 43 did not get out of their truck, 40 did a brief walk around their vehicles with some minor checks made. Brochu said, based on his research into what a brake check should entail, he doesn’t feel a single brake check was completed. Brochu said the residents’ many concerns centre on safety, noise, dust, and location – he said all the issues can be solved by moving the check’s location. Most residents in the room said they want to see the check moved further west, past the Mud River hill, to a less residential area – they also felt that hill has a greater history of accidents than Peden Hill and could be well-served by the check.
MOTI’s Regional Director, Mike Lorimer, admitted to those in attendance that there had been no consultation with area residents or industry prior to construction of the brake check and said they were trying to rectify that now. Lorimer said district officials had hoped the addition acceleration and desceleration lanes at the stop would alleviate some of the concerns, but he assured those at the meeting, "The reason we’re here is that we’re still at the point where we can make decisions about it." He said while the paving contract has been tendered, it contains provisions for the results of public consultations.
"I can’t say again how loud and clear I’ve heard from the community," said Lorimer. "This is a large number of people to turn-out to a public meeting, I ‘get’ the passion that people have about this issue, I’ve heard a consistent message." He emphasized, though, that it was his responsibility to counter-balance their safety concerns with the safety concerns of motorists on Peden Hill, where there is the potential for a major accident similar to the 1989 incident in Kamloops where a runaway truck crashed into 12 other vehicles. Five people were killed.
Lorimer told residents at last night’s meeting he will look into the rules and regulations surrounding closing the brake check temporarily until the entire issue is resolved. He said he and his team will reflect on the concerns raised at the meeting and make a decision on the brake check’s fate.
Comments
The reason the Excel chiptruck ended up in the Boston Pizza parking lot had nothing to do with not having a brake check.
Trucks not stopping at brake checks is a daily thing all over the province. The Peace country is really bad for it. Some actually pull into the stops at speed and blow right through them.
When the drive BC cameras were first installed in a number of areas including the one at the brake check above the town of Taylor, there was wide spread concern amongst truckers that if they didn’t stop and do correct brake checks they were recorded on camera. Word spread like wildfire to do your proper brake checks at that location because of the camera.
Most all brakes are self adjusting today. I don’t know of anyone that can fit easily under a chip trailer. If they have to check their brakes travel at a brake check they don’t know their vehicle and aren’t doing proper maintenance to begin with IMO.
The biggest thing is when holding a service application if any air is leaking.
The chip truck from 2010 had a broken service line between trailers from too sharp a turn… the driver should have realized this going down Mud River Hill if not before then. Any brake application should have alerted the driver to air loss. Furthermore at any time the driver in the 2010 incident could have dynamited the system and came to a quick stop with b-trailer brakes nice and cool… instead he tried to ride it out with over heated a-trailer brakes and huge air loss to the b-trailer every application made. There is a reason why that lease op never pulled another Excel trailer.
One can’t legislate for every dummy out there. The new brake check is over doing it for a problem of stupidity and not equipment failure. Brake checks should be done every time the truck is stopped. The brake check on this side of the hill is redundant for a Peden Hill with a speed limit of 60kph. Makes much more sense if one was to have a brake check to have it prior to Mud River Hill as that is a 100kph hill with far more grade and a curved bridge at the bottom… at 60kph one could easily stop quickly by simply dynamiting the brakes, but at 100kph that would be a lot more dicy trying that.
IMHO
Is that the same reason this driver and truck was observed pouring buckets of water over his drums at the dumper a day or two earlier Eagle?
Lots of urban myths, but facts are his truck was inspected after the incident and everything was good, other than of course the broken glad hand for the service line to the b-box. A box brakes couldn’t handle the load with all the air loss. Driver was in his fourties but was a new driver and that probably didn’t help. IF his trailer had problems he could have easily tagged it out and grabbed another one… in fact the lease ops often have different trailers on a daily basis, so I highly doubt any driver would ever be pouring water on brake drums for any reason at the pulp mill… never heard of such a stupid thing. It doesn’t cost him a dime to go to river road and grab another trailer.
The only reason I can think why he didn’t dynamite the trailer to come to a quick stop was because he had traffic tail gating behind him, and likely would have killed the people in the tailgating vehicle from the sudden stop had he choose to stop the unit that way? Probably didn’t have time to think through what to do either being a new driver. I talked to the driver a few months later and apparently says he’ll never drive truck again… was to spooked… probably a good idea then.
Lessons learned should be never take an extra long b-train into an area where you will be cornered and have to make a tight turn to get out (ie Bon Voyage)… always check your service line test after for leakage… and never tailgate a b-train on a hill because he might need to make a sudden emergency stop.
“I highly doubt any driver would ever be pouring water on brake drums for any reason at the pulp mill… never heard of such a stupid thing.”
“Highly doubt” all you like, but it was witnessed by many other chiptruck drivers at the time it occured.
I don’t believe it. Where would he even get the water from and what would be the point. IMO hearsay from a guy that has a history of maligning truck drivers.
Would you prefer I name names Eagle?
Lots of water available around the dumpers pal. Water is used to attempt to put out brake fires.
Maligning truck drivers???
Like the time you accused the Lomak driver of falling asleep at the wheel?
I only call them like they are Eagle. I was a chip hauler too once and know all about what goes on and have a lot of connections in the industry. I’m also a certified HD Mechanic and know all about mechanical issues with trucks.
Were you pulling these that night?
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a359/sledhed/P1010186.jpg
Theres some maintenance issues if a ever saw any.
You may recognize the building in the back ground as the one along where everyone waits in the line up to dump at Intercon.
Lots of buckets and water available there hey?
Comments for this article are closed.