Council Holds Off On Approving Police Protection Budget
Prince George, BC – Prince George City Councillors have given tentative approval to all but one portion of the proposed 2013 budget…
Last night, Councillors voted unanimously in favour of two motions put forward by the Chair of the Finance and Audit Committee, Councillor Cameron Stolz, to defer the proposed Police Protection budget to Monday, February 25th, to allow City Staff to prepare a report – in consultation with RCMP Superintendent Eric Stubbs – examining the potential implications of approving a budget of $20.4-million dollars, rather than the proposed $21.6-million dollars.
Councillor Stolz emphasized the intent is not to scale back police services – they would be maintained at 2012 levels – but, instead, to look at whether the City is being too fiscally conservative in its budget projections. Stolz points to surpluses being re-couped from the Police Protection budget over the past five years as an indication:
Year | Police Protection budget surplus |
2008 | $581-thousand dollars |
2009 | $995-thousand dollars |
2010 | $173-thousand dollars |
2011 | $607-thousand dollars |
2012 | $2.148-million dollars |
average | $900-thousand dollars |
Last year’s police services budget bylaw was for $21.55-million dollars, but the unaudited actual amount was $19.41-million dollars.
The surplus goes into the City’s general operating surplus fund, which currently sits at just under $11-million dollars. The City’s Manager of Financial Planning, Kris Dalio, says that falls on the low end of the guidelines set by the City’s sustainable finance policy. Based on its general operating fund, the surplus fund should be between $8.8-million dollars and approximately $27-million dollars.
But Councillor Stolz suggested the money could be re-directed to other areas of the city’s budget. As Councillors threw their support behind the motions, they underscored that it was not about reducing RCMP services in the city.
"What this is about, as I understand," said Councillor Dave Wilbur, "Is tightening down on the risk-management ‘cushion’, making it less risky in the sense of keeping money as a cushion for any eventuality. And, given the track record that’s been presented to us from 2008 to 2012, I think that there’s a possibility."
Councillor Murry Kraused echoed that it’s not about level of service, but about trying to find a creative way to find new dollars in the budget.
The City is contractually obligated to fund 128 full time RCMP positions, but, the local force is typically around 121 due to parental leaves, illness, and other staffing issues.
Comments
Leave the money in the surplus, and surprise everyone and have a zero increase on taxes!
macleans ranks the city as crime capital and the response from council is to look to cut their budget?
They should be putting more into the budget not less. So much for getting tough on crime.
psst, I agree with you!! Why is the City cutting back the police budget when we clearly need growth in police presence?
psst & Nao: They are not proposing taking away money for the police services. They are proposing taking away money that is not being used, and this will not affect the current service level.
A 2 million surplus is unacceptable, and shows that someone in city hall is asleep at the wheel. A few hundred thousand is understandable, but 2 million is not. How many potholes can $1 million fix?
And why not our own police force seeing as we are spending Millions on this new cop shop.send these rcmp to watch for Russians..way up north this is what they signed on for…
Don’t touch te money.. Our mayor and stooges can’t be trusted with anything let alone more money to waste.
could move a lot of snow and fix a lot of streets with that much money, or hey maybe we could go back to China for another extended visit.
zybixteu, when did the RCMP sign up to watch the Russians? quit watching the old movies
Duh?? If we get more cops we will get more traffic tickets. I took probabilities in high school.
Comments for this article are closed.