City infrastructure – Let’s hold on to what we’ve got
By Peter Ewart
There is an old proverb handed down from antiquity, and sometimes revived in modern day songs. It goes: “Hold onto what you got.”
We live in times when this proverb especially rings true when applied to public services, assets, real estate and infrastructure in the City of Prince George and other municipal jurisdictions across the country.
Powerful private interests covet these public resources, and, unfortunately, governments at all levels are making it easier for these private interests to take them over or make profit from them in one way or another, whether through Public-Private-Partnerships (P-3s), contracting out, selling off of civic properties, or outright privatization.
The latest addition to the power of these private interests is the recently concluded EU trade agreement which will allow globalized European infrastructure companies, some of whom have connections to the European mafia, even more access to bid on municipal procurement in Canada, as well as limit the ability of municipalities to buy local or establish new public services deemed to be “monopolies.”
Unfortunately, there are some politicians and administrators at the municipal level in Canada who seem to be quite willing to go along with this takeover of public assets and narrowing of public space. More than that – they actively promote it.
How is this done? One of the ways is to claim that there is no other choice but to close down or sell off existing public facilities and build brand new ones in their place. The catch, of course, is that these new facilities must be built and operated in a new way, whether through P-3s, third party operators, or outright privatizations.
In this way, private interests are able to secure longstanding arrangements to feed at the public trough. So what if taxes and user fees are jacked up and services deteriorate? So what if the municipality is plunged deeper into debt? So what if city property is sold off, then flipped by private interests in questionable deals? Long live the new model! Down with public space and up with private interest!
In these current conditions, how can a new mayor and council in Prince George resist this pressure to get swept up in this wave of new P-3 projects, privatizations and sell-offs of assets?
That’s where the old saying comes into play – “Hold onto what you got.” Applied to today, that means that the new council must strive to preserve, renew and prioritize the public infrastructure and services we already have, and be very cautious about being lured into new, unnecessary, and invariably expensive mega-projects, or being seduced into privatization and dubious third party partnership schemes of various shapes and sizes.
It means the new council must rigorously examine (and if necessary reject) claims from city administration and outside consultants that such and such a facility has “reached its end of life” and cannot be renovated, or such and such an asset, property, or service is uneconomical and must be sold off, or a new expensive chalet or palace of some kind just has to be built.
A new council should be judged, first and foremost, as to whether it looks after and preserves existing public infrastructure and services, whether these be roads, sewers, recreational facilities, parks or other assets. If there is anything new to be built, it must come after that. And it must be a public need and expansion of public space, not some developer or privatization pipe dream.
Such an approach is not as glamorous as polished wood columns, marble slabs and shining glass, and will undoubtedly mean fewer glitzy photo-ops. But, as another old saying cautions us in the brave new world of today, “all that glitters is not gold.”
Peter Ewart is a columnist and writer based in Prince George, British Columbia. He can be reached at: peter.ewart@shaw.ca
Comments
Right on Peter! These days, the throw away mentality has reached epic proportions. I think its honourable to keep up old things that still work well, instead of throwing them away in favour of something ‘new’. Usually the ‘new’ doesn’t work as well nor last nearly as long as the old.
Have the ‘labour saving’ devices we were conned into buying since the war, really given us that much more free time to spend doing the things we enjoy rather than working? Not really. Now we are bound to work more and longer just to be able to buy everything new. Any free time we used to enjoy for healthful activities are now used for new gadgets to sit and play with, to the detriment of healthy and social interactions. And all of these ‘new’ things need more working time to be able to afford. Its a vicious cycle we have adopted and only to give more wealth to the already rich.
Seems that we have been willingly duped.
Now, if we don’t get started upgrading our infrastructure in a serious way, its going to break us financially later. Will we become a bankrupt town?
Can’t decide whether you were inspired spiritually, herbually or mythical Pete. Past practices would suggest leave the pipe at home son and hire more consultants to fill the void.
Excellent article Peter …. you hit the nail on the head. I wish more people could see what’s happening here. Sometimes I feel it falls on deaf ears.
I support upgrading what we have and not selling off; contracting out; or rebuilding with P-3’s.
Simply Google “Agenda 21 in one easy lesson” for answers to public private partnerships.
Informative article. I’m certain we can go much further back than this, but you’ll see that the Washington Consensus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Consensus
also lays out a related plan back in 1989. The plan is just an after thought, formalized so it could be pushed forward. These policies are applied all over the world so that those on top can stay there. A lot of the general public doesn’t seem that concerned. The general point is that the private sector will, with the governments help of a deregulated and privatized environment, extract profit wherever it can find it. If municipal politicians are not aware of the consequences of these policies elsewhere, there is no better time than now before you go into the voting booth.
Comments for this article are closed.