Sinclair….. Still in the Fight
Prince George, B.C.- Jim Sinclair may not be the head of the BC Federation of Labour anymore, but he is still willing to rally the troops and dig in for a fight.
Speaking at the May Day dinner in Prince George last night, Sinclair says the battle continues “We have a lot to celebrate, we have a lot of challenges, but we have a lot to celebrate” He says there has been significant progress since May Day started over a century ago, “You look at this town, 35% of the money in this town, for the most part, comes from public sector wages for the people who are working at the University, working in the schools, working at the hospital, working at the college. Another 35% comes mostly from the resource sector, and the other 30% comes from pension cheques that came from those sectors or from those people supporting local businesses with their paycheques. That’s what we ( the working class) created, safe decent places for people to live.”
Sinclair says inequality remains a number one issue, “With all the technology and all the advances we’ve made, we’ve actually created a world that has more inequality not less, this is insanity.” He says the barriers are higher today for young people who want to advance their education and move forward as the costs for college or university are out of reach for too many.
It’s been just over a year since he stepped away from leading the BC Federation of Labour “It’s a bit of a change” says Sinclair “I don’t have any regrets in that decision at all, it’s time for some new energy and some new blood and I felt it was in good shape when I left.”
Lately his focus has been on LNG, as he is the Vice Chair of the Premier’s working group “Our big job has been to figure out, how, if they build LNG and that’s still a question, but my attitude from the very beginning has been, if we’re going to build it then we should build it. It should involve massive training of young people in trades and skills that we can continue to use to build the province so we don’t just build a plant and a pipeline, we actually build British Columbia.”
While he says there has been effort to train young people, the problem remains that those young people can’t get their apprenticeships “So what we’ve said on LNG, and the companies have agreed, is that our goal is one out of every four tradespeople on the project should be an apprentice. It means that at the peak of construction on one project, there would be over 2,000 apprentices on the job.”
So, while not at the head of the BC Federation of Labour anymore, he continues to battle on behalf of the working class in a fight that has always had one goal “For working people to have hope of a decent life, that’s what the fight has always been about and will continue to be about as long as I’m alive and long after I’m gone.”
Comments
Poll shows support for LNG slipping, dislike for fracking increasing
ht tp://vancouversun.com/business/energy/poll-shows-support-for-lng-slipping-dislike-for-fracking-increasing
It’s pie-in-the-sky, and has been since the beginning. Does it make any sense at all to glut an already glutted global market, and have to sell your product below cost into export just to provide ‘jobs’ that still won’t pay enough ‘incomes’ to cover the additional costs that will (have to be) charged to use natural gas (and everything else) here to cover what we’re losing on sales abroad?
But that’s just what we (continue) to try to do. Not just with LNG, with a whole range of commodities.
Imagine if any of our ancestors, going back to a time when just coming to BC from wherever they originated was a major challenge, not bureaucratically, like now, but physically, and you told them they’d have to pay MORE for all the products from here they were going to consume than what they were paying where they were. Who would’ve come? They came to have a life more abundant. But we’ve swung it around so that we’re now penalised because we abound in natural resources. Crazy as it sounds, look at it, and tell me that’s NOT what we’re doing.
Another sign of a glut on the market place. Enbridge announced today they are looking at selling off their main US natural gas business due to it posting a 51 percent drop in Q1 revenue in that market, and an overall decline of revenue of 26 percent due to natural gas weakness.
So Jim doesn’t see a problem with those percentages! Public sector wages 35% and resource sector 35%.
Problem? Not in Jim’s world! This man has been out of touch with reality for dare I say the bulk of his working career!
The public sector has become the “haves” and the private sector has become the “have nots”!
I wonder how many negative comments my post will receive? Perhaps I’ll set a new record, haha!
Where did Jim get his figures? Are they even accurate? Maybe he’s just pulling them out of thin air?
Comments for this article are closed.