I Have Been Accused Of Being Negative In Saying The Economy Was Heading For The Tank
By Ben Meisner
In the past year I have been accused, on countless times, of being a negative person. I have taken the position during that period that the system was about to fall on its face. I was told by the powers that be that the glass was half full not half empty.
Well folks the chickens have come home to roost. I had predicted that our housing prices would go flat even drop before things began to pick up. They are in the process of doing just that.
I predicted that the lumber industry would be a shell of its former self; I was called nuts, a guy who only looks at the dark side of thing, well the forest industry is in the tank, and if you can see some hope in the immediate future, let me know.
We are being told that the Canadian economy is strong, 'don’t worry be happy' is the pitch. Well I would like an explanation as to why the Canadian dollar sits at 90 cents. If the Canadian economy is in such good shape compared to others in the world, wouldn’t there be a rush to pick up Canadian bucks instead of American dollars, the Yankee buck is still holding up why are we heading to the toilet?
But then I can expect to hear more about how I am a negative person. I am negative in believing that my RSP’s are heading for the tank, (which they have). I am negative in believing that the value of my home, car and boat will also drop considerably.
Anyone that thinks that the value of their RSP will remain or regain its former value in the next few weeks or months is thinking in pink.
I for one believe that it is going to get a lot tougher before it ends and Oh yes for making that statement one more time, I am negative. But maybe you might want to check your retirement funds, your RSP, and the value of your home , what it is today and what it was oh say a couple of months ago.
I’m Meisner and that’s one man’s opinion.
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home
I think that Canada has a good social safety net that America does not have, as well we have higher interest rates, no budget deficit, and less then half the debt per capita of the Americans. For this reason I think we will do a lot better and recover a lot sooner, but our exports will hurt. I don't think the growing Asian economies will not be effected in the long run as bad as the Americans, and their growth will also I think soften our blow 6-months from now. I think the turning point will be when you see the Canadian stock market going up while the American market continues down. The trend could set Canada up well for when the recession is over with money going where the money is to be made.
Ben, I do however see some hope on the horizon... a small glimmer. Last nights presidential debate saw John McCain come out with a policy from left field that he must have read here on oppinion250 last week when I made my suggestion for a bad housing market policy.
McCain wants to insure homes that were sold resetting mortgage rates for the difference in the buying price and the current value... I would hope that is after they enter foreclosure, so its not a free ride... but addresses the home affordability and market stabilization aspects that are the genus of any recovery. It went right over most people heads and those that did notice ridiculed, but give them a few more days to think about it. Clearly stabilizing home values in the states, so as to have a basis to value everything else should be the primary efforts to fix the system.
The banksters would like nothing more than to see $400 dollar a 1000-board feet lumber now days I bet (to save their butts), if for no other reason then to maintain new home values. Maybe in addition to McCain's policy we also need the price set at $400 with any difference between mills that need the cash flow (and thus sell for less), and the set market price, going to a pool to pay dividends to the hourly workers across the industry? It could be done where markets are maintained, values are maintained, and workers receive the benefit from anyone that tries to undercut the industry.
So anyways McCain is good for Prince George if elected because his policy to maintain home values and home ownership will be the best thing for maintaining the lumber markets for our 2x4's. Plus the added benefit that Palin will be all for highway, pipeline, and rail line connections through PG to the lower-48 worth tens of billions of dollars in infrastructure construction.
Obama on the other hand is bad for Canada and bad for the economy in general. Obama used the Harper term for our North Arctic when he said America has access to the energy in oil and gas that it requires, but those that control the rights need to get out of the way and that they should 'use it or lose it'. Can there be any doubt he is parroting the same neo-con line as Harper? We do know that this is a race between two flavors of neo-cons do we not? Its a classic lesser of two evils electoral campaign. Furthermore, Obama is a protectionist that wants to opt out of NAFTA. When Obama talks regulating the market he is really talking managing the market through protectionist policies that would hurt Canada. Obama is not talking about regulating the banksters in their abuse of leverage and monopolistic practices... maybe because that is who funded his campaign... maybe because his speech writers haven't put it in the speeches yet?
So long story short is I think John McCain is the best hope for recovery and in the mean time you might want to be in bonds so you have dry power when the opportunity arises.
Time Will Tell