Clear Full Forecast

Road Crossings Hard On Fish

By 250 News

Wednesday, January 21, 2009 03:50 PM

 VICTORIA - A study of 1,110 road crossings over fish streams in 19 watersheds around B.C. has found that, in total, less than half of the crossings were likely to allow fish to pass through without problems, according to a Forest Practices Board report released today.

The board's special investigation looked at crossings in two types of habitat and found that in habitat classified as "important or critical," bridges, or similar crossings that don't disturb natural stream beds were used for 72 percent of crossings, allowing for successful passage of fish to upstream waters.

However, in habitat classified as "marginal," bridges or similar crossings were used only 12 percent of the time, and the rest of the crossings consisted of pipe culverts or other closed bottom structures, and were unlikely to allow successful fish passage.

"Our research shows that there is a significant risk to fish due to the use of culverts on many fish streams,  and that while most of the impeded crossings were in marginal habitat, a substantial number of crossings in valuable fish habitat were compromised as well," said board chair Bruce Fraser.

"While government is taking steps to maintain and restore fish passage on forestry roads, we also found  that there is a legacy of problems created by other types of roads in forested watersheds - highways, railways, and other resource access roads - that also need to be addressed."

The Forest and Range Practices Act requires forest roads to be constructed and maintained so they do not cause a material adverse effect on fish passage. However, the legislation does not  apply to non-forestry roads, or to roads built before 1995.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

I can see the future before me.......

Forest roads closed all over the province.
Actually most culverted rds are already closed (deactivated) shortly after use. It costs a lot to do and doesnt have much to do with fish habitat. Of course, the cost of putting up and then removing actual bridges would be even higher. I think a more permanent system of roads might serve the fishies better.
Hmmm, I've been all over this province over the last 40 years and still up to this day there are thousands of bush roads with culverts that are not deactivated.
So wherever you are getting your info saying most culverted roads are already closed I would like to know?
It's not the forestry roads that is the problem. All those accesses have to be built to higher environmental standards.

It's the Municipal and Highway roads that are the biggest offender. Just look at any creek crossing on Giscome Road, or where Tabor Creek crosses Highway 97 south. The offending 28 percent is not industrial or forestry, it is crossings built by those that make the standards - the government. It's what happens when a public resource is owned and managed by the public. No one is responsible.

CN/BcRail is one of the biggest players here. Try to find a rail culvert that doesnt have 1m plunge pool at the outlet.
IMO this is the biggest killer of the Salmon. When you see them spawn and where they spawn it is obvious that culverts especially nearest the big rivers are spawning Salmon killers by taking away prime habitate.
Yup culverts are a problem but yet the govt allows private corporations to do this to our fish bearing streams across the province, no problem.

http://saveourrivers.tv/powerplay_player5.html
Thanks for the great link Lost.
metalman.
I am getting my statement from the facts, actually, rather than anecdotes. Road deactivation has been going on for a number of years now on all roads not being used currently or in the near future. While older roads, or roads in wood lots may be left in place, it is standard practice to deactivate roads. If you dont believe me, read the relevant regulations in the old Forest Practices Code or contact Canfor or the ministry of forests. As a side note, roads built for other purposes (oil and gas for example) are often mistaken for forestry roads. They are not, no are they deactivated when not in use as most forestry roads are.