Clear Full Forecast

Illegal Hunt Costs $4,000

By 250 News

Tuesday, February 24, 2009 04:38 PM

 

Ft.St.John - A Vancouver man has been convicted of four charges under the Wildlife Act and Regulations and one charge under the Firearm Act. He has been ordered to pay $4,000 for the killing of a mule deer buck and a white-tailed doe.

 

In a Vancouver courtroom on Feb. 13, 2009, Lei Chen, of Vancouver, was convicted of two charges under the Wildlife Act: the unlawful possession of dead wildlife, and hunting wildlife that were not in open season. He was also convicted of one charge of discharging, carrying or possessing a loaded firearm in a vehicle under the Firearm Act. Chen was fined $300 and ordered to make a payment of $3,700 to the Habitat Conservation Trust Foundation.

 

In addition to the monetary penalties, Chen has been ordered not to hunt, or be in the presence of someone hunting, going hunting or returning from a hunt, for a period of two years. Chen will also be required to re-take the Conservation and Outdoor Recreation Education Program before he reapplies for a hunting licence. His rifle valued at $2,500 was forfeited to the B.C. government.

 

The charges were laid after an investigation involving the Ministry of Environment's Conservation Officer Service in Fort St John. Chen was hunting in the Osburn area, approximately 60 miles north east of Fort St. John, when he illegally shot both deer with a rifle during an archery-only season.

 

The maximum fine for a conviction under the B.C. Wildlife Act is now $500,000, up from the previous $150,000 maximum, following amendments introduced by the government last year. Penalties can also include imprisonment for up to three years, up from the previous maximum of 18 months. The most severe penalties are for those convicted of killing

endangered species.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Could have bought a few beef to fill his freezer at that price never mind the cost of getting to Ft St John. Good thing he can't hunt. We dodn't need those type of hunters up here.
penalty not near severe enough

Ironically if he shot a drug dealer in Surrey no one would even pretend to care!
If we could only get those drug dealers to wear antlers.
Always go hunting with a native buddy, then you don't have to worry about about what the rules are.
Ironically, the penalties for shooting an animal you're not supposed to, are greater than shooting another human being.

Maybe that's what we should do. In addition to jail time, we should be charging the convicted murderers, and their families, a huge sum of money.

Oh, the changes I could make if the people would just elect me.
Not good enough.
Should be a much higher fine(double)and maybe even some jail time,depending on the circumstances.
Inexcusable behavior!
beesknees...you get on the ballot and I will vote for you!
We need to see more of this for people that poach. I think the courts should have confiscated his vehicle as well for its use in the crime.
Thats the third news story very identical to this one that I've read in the last couple weeks. Very simular names and circumstances. The first was in the free press, thought it was around here and the other was from the Valemont area. The charges were very much the same in all cases but the penaties were a bit different....the fines seemed pretty low in the first two cases if I remember correctly. Anyone else notice these or are these all the same story?
"Maybe that's what we should do. In addition to jail time, we should be charging the convicted murderers, and their families, a huge sum of money."

Thats right Beesknees if someone in your family breaks the law we will be coming for you. Even though you are innocent of any crime. Just because you are related to a criminal you will pay.

You're a frikken doehead!
Beesknees are you for real. What are you going to charge the families with.
Have you thought of running for the NDP.
"Beesknees are you for real. What are you going to charge the families with.
Have you thought of running for the NDP."

That's impossible. The NDP only want to have female candidates. I'm not a female :-)

Besides which, I don't like Carole. She wears on me - too tiresome to deal with.
Posted by: Quaddin on February 25 2009 1:11 PM
Beesknees are you for real. What are you going to charge the families with.
Have you thought of running for the NDP.


They wouldn't allow anyone that thinks like a liberal!