Clear Full Forecast

Report from Parliament's Hill - April 2nd, 2009

By Prince George - Peace River M.P. Jay Hill

Thursday, April 02, 2009 03:45 AM

“Double and Triple Credit for Time Served Is Not Deserved”
 
According to his lawyer, while Henry Danninger was out on bail awaiting his trial for the fatal stabbing of engineering student and Good Samaritan Andy Moffitt, it was “stress” that prompted him to dump urine and feces on his neighbours’ car every night. 
 
When Danninger was sentenced for manslaughter, an Ontario judge gave him DOUBLE credit for the time he was out terrorizing his neighbours and for the time he spent in pre-trial custody.  His eight-year sentence was reduced to five and he was eligible for day parole in just over a year. 
 
While awaiting trial and sentencing for heroin trafficking, Nicholas Chan was repeatedly denied a vegetarian meal, had access to only three board games and could only speak to his family through a glass partition.  This “exceptionally hard time that Chan experienced”, according to the Alberta judge that sentenced him upon conviction, meant he deserved TRIPLE credit, leaving him less than a year to serve on a seven-and-a-half year sentence.
 
The granting of 2-for-1 credit and even triple credit for the “dead time” that offenders spend in detention centres awaiting their trial and sentencing has become standard practise by Canadian judges.
 
The basis for this measure is that criminals “deserve” extra credit  for having to serve in pre-trial facilities that are sometimes overcrowded and do not offer offenders the amenities and programs they could access at penitentiaries.
 
Yet take the case of an offender considered too violent or too great a risk to society to be released on bail, such as gang members currently terrorizing parts of British Columbia.  Ironically, such offenders will eventually be “rewarded” for their status as a threat by being given extra credit for the time they were forced to remain in pre-trial detention just to keep their community safe!
Last week, on behalf of my colleague Justice Minister Rob Nicholson, I introduced in the House of Commons legislation to restrict the use of “credit for time served”. Bill C-25 will cap the credit convicts receive for pre-sentencing custody at a one-to-one ratio.  Under very limited circumstances, judges could use a 1.5 to 1 credit but only after justifying it with a written explanation.
 
Provincial and territorial governments, law enforcement officers and community advocates have been calling on the federal government to end “credit for time served” as defendants, especially repeat criminals and gang members, have learned to manipulate the court system with procedural delays and other tactics.  This allows them to intentionally build up their “dead time” in pre-trial facilities, thereby shortening their penitentiary sentences and their total time in jail.
 
Supporters of the measure argue it’s a matter of ‘fairness’ for offenders because they can’t access rehabilitation and other programs in pre-trial facilities.  Yet convicts’ access to rehabilitation programs is further restricted when their penitentiary sentences are cut and, in some cases, eliminated through credit for time served. 
 
Our Government and the Correctional Service of Canada will continue to monitor any extra costs or added strain on prison capacities associated with this reform. Truth-in-Sentencing is just one more action our Conservative Government is taking to reform our justice system.

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Pretty funny Jay.
You sit there telling us how bad our judges are in giving the bad guy's credit for time served when the law allowed them to do so.
Now you are trying to make yourselves look good by changing the laws surrounding the issue.

Remember Jay, it was/is politicians like you that wrote/write the laws that allow these scumbags of the world to have more rights than the victims.

You should be ashamed of yourself pointing the finger at the judges when it is the govt's fault. You and your buddies are the law makers Jay!
This may work fine, as long as there is time to process the cases. My fear is that a lot of the cases will be dropped because it is taking too long to get to court. If they no longer receive extra credit for time served in custody, the lawyers will be demanding early court dates, and if they can't get their day in court reasonably soon, they'll be asking for the charges to be dropped.
it all depends.
If they hare habituated criminals, they will get a minimum sentence anyway.
if they are a one time offense or even accidental, then they will get a maximum sentence.
Gee, I wonder why we have a criminal and and gang problem?!

Change the law so that repeat offenders get escalating time for each offense and discourage concurrent sentences for multiple convictions on repeat offenders.

Do the right thing and you may get to keep your job, Jay.
Excellent progress! Good work!!
Excellent progress! Good work!!

Thats a statement that should have been made 50 years ago regarding this story.

Common sense and politicians do not connect.
I am very sorry that you have lost faith, but the reality is, we are where we are and it simply doesn't make sense to use past inaction to justify not moving forward today. In an ideal world, we can have all the things we would like to have perfectly in real-time, but this just isn't the way things are. Therefore, we should take pride in positive steps that are taken in the right direction and see them for what they really are - progress. We can't change the past - it is already gone - BUT we CAN change the present and we CAN change the future. That is all anybody can be expected to do.
I'll reserve my cudos and accolades when I actually see a real change and when I am satisfied that the new approach is working out in reality.

Judges resent any interference into their ability to pass sentences as they see fit.

Until now, if there is even the slightest backdoor or opportunity to find some circumstances that would justify a circumvention of so-called strict rules there have been those who found it.

Time will tell, but I am not too optimistic.

Everything politicians promise must be taken with a lot of skepticism - that's how it is in reality.