Clear Full Forecast

Northerners must speak with one voice

By 250 News

Monday, December 05, 2005 03:45 AM

By Peter Ewart

For many decades, the Central and Northern Interior of BC have contributed huge amounts of revenues to the provincial government coffers in the form of stumpage fees, royalties and taxes. Over the years this contribution has amounted to tens of billions of dollars which the governments of various stripes have utilized in various ways, many of which have benefited the North little or not at all.

The latest example is the much hyped 2010 Vancouver – Whistler Olympics. This two-week extravaganza of gold medals to athletes and concrete monuments to politicians is estimated to suck billions of dollars out of the provincial and federal government budgets. What will be the return? Construction companies in the Lower Mainland will make a lot of money, and so will the tourist industry. But even the most starry eyed and enthusiastic politician has a hard time explaining how the Olympics will benefit in any substantial way the resource extraction and manufacturing heart of British Columbia.

The latest revelation from John Furlong, the CEO of the Vancouver Olympics Organizing Committee, is that construction costs for the Games venues and facilities could jump 40 to 50% over original estimates. The reason given is that “the original estimate was made in 2002 dollars.” Apparently, Organizing Committee representatives have only just learned the elementary accounting lesson that in a multi-year construction venture you must factor into your estimate what material, labour, and other costs will be in 5 or 6 years, as well as other factors such as inflation. That is why it is called an estimate. Perhaps part of the problem is that the firm involved in developing the estimates for the Olympics was none other than the Arthur Anderson firm whose parent company was implicated in the Enron accounting scandal in the U.S. Critics of the 2010 Olympics raised this fact several years ago but were ignored amidst all the hoopla.

Another concern raised by Derek Holt, RBC Financial Group’s chief economist, is that “there’s a strong chance the provincial economy will go into a serious slump” immediately after the Vancouver Whistler Olympics (Richmond Review, Nov. 26, 2005). Unfortunately, that is about the same time that the full brunt of the downturn in our region as a result of the pine beetle infestation is expected to hit us.

So Northerners could be facing a “perfect storm” of their own in terms of these three threats: spiraling Olympics costs, economic downturn after the Olympics, and economic downturn as a result of the pine beetle infestation. Add in a possible U.S. recession and there could well be a serious problem ahead for our region. Yet for the next five years we know that the provincial government is going to be caught up in the hoopla of the Olympics and dazzled by all the “glory” it will bring.

In the midst of this “perfect storm”, Northerners will have to make their concerns loud and clear about the pine beetle epidemic, and the billions of dollars of aid from government for economic development, reforestation, displaced worker training and so on that are vital to see our region through this turbulent period.

One of the problems in the past is that Northerners have not spoken with a unified voice to the provincial government. Too often, our political representatives, as well as various organizations they have influence over, have taken positions that are contrary to the interests of Northerners. The sale of BC Rail to CN is one of the sorriest examples.

Why is this the case? Party factionalism is a big factor. Instead of Northerners and their representatives lining up together to make demands of the provincial government, too often they line up according to party faction, that is, either the Liberals or NDP. This factionalism is very destructive for the North and prevents us from bringing maximum weight to our demands.

We, as northerners, have contributed hugely to the province over the last 50 or 60 years. Today we are facing some serious economic problems down the road, and it is our turn to get something substantial back. But to do so, we must speak with one voice, whether we are municipal or provincial politicians, Chamber of Commerce, unions, community groups or ordinary people. In terms of the longterm economic interest of our region and the province, our forests and the forest industry are far more important than the two-week extravaganza in 2010. But don’t bet that the politicians based in the Lower Mainland nor the provincial government thinks so.

Five years ago, concerned citizens filled the Multiplex with over 7,000 people who demanded that something be done about health care in the North. That got results. Regarding the pine beetle epidemic, maybe what is needed is a march on Vancouver and Victoria supported by everyone in the Interior and North. As the full extent of the pine beetle devastation unfolds, such an action may not be so far fetched

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

What is needed IMO is the Province of Northern BC. That is the only way we will have any say in how our resource dollars are spent for our future development.

The Lower Mainland is already 20+ times our size and is expected to double in size by 2010.

Most people in the Lower Mainland could care less about the North and only see it as a source of revenue for their future plans. This is a situation that will only get worse as the years go by.

In the meantime Peter is right about Northern unity on Northern issues and is one of the few who makes the effort to get people involved.

Keep up the good work.
Well, we took the first step and democratically elected 3 (three!!!) Members of the Legislature to represent us and our northern concerns in balmy Victoria!

It was a sweep and that ought to count for something!


First Avenue repaving was promised for the last two years and post-poned yet again! We need immediate action on the long ago promised (since Harcourt!) cancer clinic!

The Cameron Street bridge must be replaced with a new steel superstructure this spring! There are fabricating shops in Prince George that should be manufacturing the components as we speak. Are we going to wait until we have some fatalities on Fifth Avenue or Carney Street???

There are dozens of other urgent problems,
perhaps to be ignored by the elected talking heads at their own peril.
Prince George is as far away from Whistler as Whistler and its two week glory are from Prince George!

Rustad, Bond and Bell - where are you???

(Vacationing).
can anyone explain where the northern anti-olympic
bias comes from. I think its apparent to most that Vancouver will get the lion's share of facilities and Tourists. Just like the recent grey cup. I lived in Calgary in 1988 when the Olypics were there. I don't recall edmontonians and Northern Albertans sniviling that only Calgary was getting attention. we were all proud of our province to be holding such a world class event. Using this issue to further what are many northern inequities looks like sour grapes.
"can anyone explain where the northern anti-olympic bias comes from."

Well, since ALL BC taxpayers will have to pay the bills for the Whistler caper ALL BC taxpayers are entitled to have and voice an opinion, don't you agree? I personally am not anti-Olympics but I have been told about the immense benefits that the northern region will reap by those who decided to go ahead with the thing, and I know that it just won't happen. Can the thing be cancelled? No.

The province has just emerged from the dark nineties when it dropped from number one to number ten; there is so much catching up to do and there are so many other priorities to attend to first!

How come we can find funds for Olympic facilities but we can't seem to find any to build a cancer clinic in Prince George and to repair the atrociously neglected infrastructure, namely roads, streets and bridges?
Modern day Olympics are not the money sink holes they once where. The Calgary Olympics made money and left many legacies. I don't think its a simple as saying "Olympics" or "cancer clinic". If there is a deficit, all BC will pay as well as all Canadian taxpayers. But it just seams negative and defeatist when the Olymics are really a once in a lifetime event, and the debate boils down to "whats in it for us"?
Watch out for that "egg on your face" when you have that question "what's in it for us" answered with SWEET NOTHING.
I cannot believe how naive some of the people in the north are. Is it new-or are some brains frost bitten about now.
Chad is so hung up on his Eco tourism brilliant, (in his opinion) brainwave.
We will get nothing out of this costly Olympic event, and we are hundreds of miles from the events, so maybe a chosen few can go spend some more money to attend. Surely the Mayor and Offet will be there for a couple weeks, calling it a learning experience to bring ideas back to profit Prince George. Oh, maybe not, surely the residents of this city will be wiser in 2008, (next election for those who question the year).
Knowing the voters in Prince George, 2008 will bring about no changes at Prince George City Hall, providing they are still alive and well.
Yes, the money should be forthcoming for a new bridge, and yes, there should be a cancer clinic in the north-BUT_if all the money is required for the South, then we will pay, and get nothing.
Why cannot the people in this region wake up.
Wait for the realization to set in re the upcoming problems in
forestry.
Maybe not too many-if nature says a big burn will be in order-as that will surely mean an absolutely HUGE exodus out of British Columbia.
This province has been plagued with problems, yet the people just vote back in the ones who have settled comfortably in front of the trough, and life goes on.
It even amazes me we cannot bring to a climax the Softwood Lumber dispute.
WE WIN, and WE WIN, and WE WIN???
WIN WHAT?
Is the money collected returned??
NO.
The heighth of stupidity is played out, over and over, and the B C forest industry only knows how to roll over and pay.
The governments are so afraid of their FRIENDLY NEIGHBOR they are totally gutless.
Why not play PAYBACK TIME WITH OUR RESOURCES?
When do we quit KISSING BUTT and stand up to be counted???
The trouble we are in could be like a Sunday school picnic compared to the trouble we can face in 5 years.
Oh well, who worries in the North???
Do not take steps that could be considered a "counter attack."
Why bother??
Olympics 2010 in the Heart of Bitish Columbia.
Prince George.

Spend the 2010 Winter Olympics in the Northern Capital of British Columbia. Get close to the action! Join the locals in their pubs viewing the competition on the modern screens hooked in directly to international TV in the language of your choice.

Each of the many pubs all over this well known Canadian winter sports City will be broadcasting for specific nations and providing national drinks and food for Germans, Americans, Norwegians, Canadians, Russians, Austrians, Italians, French, Swiss, Dutch, Chinese, Fins, Swedes, Japanese and others.

We guarantee you that you will not have to miss a minute of your native TV coverage while enjoying the winter on Canadian soil. No crowds. No exhorbitant accommodation rates. Just a plain relaxing and friendly atmosphere away from home.

For those who are more active minded, enjoy a variety of different winter sports - dog sledding, snowmobiling, heli-skiing, skating and many others.

Prince George, the Olympic treasure you too can discover!
>Why not play PAYBACK TIME WITH OUR RESOURCES?
When do we quit KISSING BUTT and stand up to be counted??? <

Take the time to download the NAFTA agreement from the Internet. There are specific rules regarding water, energy, lumber and so forth. The Mexicans refused to sign the portions related to oil, natural gas and water, but Mulroney's minions signed the whole thing, lock stock and barrel. That is why I loathe anything called Conservative! The Yanks know that they are in the driver's seat, don't worry!

Iven if they were acting contrary to NAFTA rules NAFTA itself doesn't give us much freedom to retaliate without the danger of for more damaging retaliation from our friends across the border.