Clear Full Forecast

Fire Fuel Reduction Work Focuses on Critical Areas

By 250 News

Monday, May 25, 2009 10:10 AM

Prince George, B.C. - The Province has been working on fire fuel mitigation for several years.
“This is not to minimize the work that needs to be done, but a great deal of work has been done, focusing on the high risk areas” says Pat Bell, MLA for Prince George – Mackenzie.
 
Bell was speaking on the Meisner program this morning on CFIS FM  in reaction to a report issued last Friday which said many communities in the B.C. Interior are at significant risk of potentially catastrophic forest fires this summer, because critical prevention work promised by the government has not been done.
 
Forest Economist Tom Hobby was quoted as saying “We’re sitting on a time bomb." He says there hasn’t been enough done to deal with dead stands of pine beetle killed trees, and that 1.7 million hectares of forest needs to be dealt with.
 
Bell says over the past five years 95 communities in B.C. have worked on reducing forest fire fuels. “If people have recently travelled through Bear Lake they will ask, where have all the trees gone? That’s because the stand of trees was at a very high risk of burning, so the dead stands have been removed and the grinders have been on site removing materials from the forest floor.”
 
Bell says there have been 260 projects throughout the province, and some 35 thousand hectares of forest treated in critical areas near communities. The money for the projects is managed by the Union of B.C. Municipalities which was given $37 million dollars to distribute for such projects.
 
Bell says whether there are dead trees or not, there lies a responsibility among all British Columbians to be careful with fire. “More than half of all fires are human caused, just a few weeks ago, there was the fire at 70 Mile House, which it appears was caused by someone doing burning when they shouldn’t have.” Bell says whether a forest area has been treated or not, everyone needs to be extra careful.

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Can you say back burn?
The only reason forest fires are not allowed is all about saving the forest for the lumber and pulp.

Due to the fact that no wild fires have ripped through the forests, there is now a thick, dry layer of tinder just waiting for a spark to explode into a firestorm. The fix is not a matter of putting many dollars towards labour intensive mitigation work. The fix is to let fires go.
Sure, save structures and back burn off roads and make sure of safety. Otherwise, to quote a local media person, "Let 'er rip!"
Yeah definitely... many years of "hit it hard and fast" have put us in this current situation, along with other factors like MPB. But there is a lot being done today to reverse this chain of thought, as we train ourselves to think of fires as natural events. Stand structure is driven by the frequency and intensity of fires, and by essentially stopping this event we've skewed the natural forest structure.

But I think the point is that since we let it get to this point, just "let 'er rip" can lead to more severe fires with potential for out of control fires or risk to homes, etc. Out in the middle of the forest, where there's no houses or infrastructure, sure, let it burn. But in places like Bear Lake, mechanically removing the fuels is probably the only option.
It really does not matter what or how we mitigate this, there is going to be a firestorm, maybe even this year.
With an excess of understory fuels and standing beetle kill, it is not whether it it will, rather when it will.

I did mention structures and properties needing to be protected. The method would be to burn off flammable fuels from those structures, call it back burning.

This pushes the area around that can ignite, and it may just initiate an early season burn of the region. A lot of small fires could burn out the fuels required for a firestorm to even occur.

What do we know, we are just residents and workers and care takers of a forest based economy. Surely an entrepreneurial business person now in charge of our forest knows much better how this should be managed and where to get the best value for dollars spent.
You're right, there's potential for a serious firestorm. Something's got to be done.