Clear Full Forecast

Pipeline Spokesman Defends Safety Record

By 250 News

Friday, June 05, 2009 11:26 AM

Prince George, B.C.- The Northern Gateway Pipeline project Vice President of Government and Public Affairs says his company’s spill record needs to be looked at in correlation to the amount of product it handles. “Of the 2,268 barrels of oil lost in 2008, the vast majority of spills happened within our pump stations or tank farms” says Steven Greenaway. “That 2,268 barrels is less than 3/10,000ths of one percent of the 800 million of barrels we shipped last year, that’s a pretty good record.”
Greenaway was on the Meisner program on CFIS FM this morning, responding to concerns from First Nations groups about the environmental impacts of the dual pipeline project that would carry oil from Alberta to a marine terminal in Kitimat, and condensate from Kitimat back to Alberta. The Carrier Sekani tribal Chief, David Luggi, says the lines have to cross many streams and rivers, and he is very concerned about the impact of a pipeline leak, or break. “This is proven technology” says Greenaway “Our lines already cross hundreds of rivers, including the Athabasca and the North and South Saskatchewan, this is not something we take lightly.”
Today and tomorrow, there is a First Nations Energy Summit underway in Moricetown. While the theme is listed as “Inform and Inspire” no one from the Northern Gateway project was invited to attend the two day session to address any questions or concerns about the project. Today, the Summit is open only to First Nations delegates, but tomorrow, the general public is invited to attend.
Greenaway says the project is just weeks away from releasing details on how First Nations can become equity partners in the   project. “We have spent months working behind the scenes on an equity offer we can bring to First Nations” he says the principles of the deal will ensure the offer is not out of the financial reach to those who want to take part.
As Enbridge has held some 19 open houses in communities along the proposed route of the pipeline, Greenaway says opposition at this point is a little premature “I think in some ways there has been a rush to judgement on this project. We need time to collect people’s concerns, address those concerns and bring that back to the people.”
Greenaway says the Carrier-Sekani Tribal Council already supports the Pacific Trails project which would see the development of a Liquid Natural Gas pipeline to a marine terminal in Kitimat “I am hopeful that through that experience they will want to become involved in the Northern Gateway project. If not as equity partners, then by sharing their knowledge of the environmental concerns in the area and helping us design the pipeline. I look forward to and welcome those discussions.”

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

I don't believe that comparing barrels of oil "spilled" or "leaked" from the system to total barrels "shipped" last year is the best approach to say "that's a pretty good record". It is more realistic to look at all the spill sites, ask how they were contained; what it took to "clean" them up; were they cleaned up?; How much soil had to go to hazardous landfills?; Was the groundwater contaminated?; Was it cleaned up?, How or was the land and streams or groundwater restored back to pre-spill conditions? These are the questions we should ask. If your really curious, research and ask the individuals that were personally affected by an Enbridge spill. Oh...and look at the great job of reclamation where the tar sands are being mined. It scares me when I see the landscape that remains after the tar sands are mined.
doom and gloom as usual on here.
There are always folks who dont believe eggs should be broken but want the omlettes. The questions posed above are for the ministry of environment (or the albertan equivalent). They are in charge of setting regs and enforcing them. If they did their job, so did the oil company.
There isnt any way to win for the pipeline company here. The Native info sessions are closed for a reason. They are strategy sessions. It doesnt matter what enbridges record is here, except to convince the general public. The bands (and most of those already opposed and actively objecting) have made up their minds. One barrel of leaked oil would be enough for these folks.
Now with the equity offer we will find out if the concerns are for the environment or cash!
I wonder how many barrels of oil are leaked on the reserves from all the junk cars laying around.The reserve in fort st james has a creek with about 4 old oil drums laying in it that is about 300 meters from stuart lake. The proof is right across from petro can....
let's not care about the enviroment just kill everything and every animal these companies just care about the almighy dollar
"There are always folks who dont believe eggs should be broken but want the omlettes."

It's a good thing that Canada's economy is not dependent on the extraction of resources and exports of such! We have far too many manufacturing jobs already (zero unemployment, zero national debt) and that alone makes for an overabundance of wealth, a comfortable standard of living and plenty of cash for everybody!

So, why break any eggs at all?

The eggs we typically eat come from chicken.

I am more concerned that we understand what is a chicken and what is an egg.

I believe we need to make sure chickens do not become extinct, otherwise we will have no eggs for omelletes.

As put in a more well known saying: "don't kill the goose that lays the golden egg."
Will if you look at safety stats at sawmills and planers and in the pulp and paper. Nobody seem to get hurt but you got lots of walking wounded so the companies can look good in the eyes of their boss and WorkSafe.They do everything they can to plump their safety stats and i bet it's the same for Northern Gateway Pipeline they do the same thing to make the company look safer
Actually all accidents must be reported to First Aid and later analyzed for why they occurred and how they can be prevented.

Often it is negligence by the company, often workers didn't use the mandatory safety equipment and/or procedures like proper lockout, googles, gloves, face shields, respirators and so forth.

Outside of the mills, just look at the vast majority of bicycle riders who don't wear the mandatory helmets, rarely if ever stop at stop signs and even disregard red traffic lights.

Then there is the still existing disobedience in respect to wearing seatbelts in cars, the use of cell phones while driving, tailgating, speeding, not stopping at stop signs and so forth.

Perhaps some of these poor habits carry over into the work place and then some avoidable accidents can be the result.

Do the companies plump their safety stats? Maybe, but then the union through the shop stewards should take over and report all injuries (no matter how small) to the proper authorities.

If one is injured and unable to work one should not be on the job unless it is on light duty. Even then one must present a statement from a doctor allowing it or a return to the usual job.



Make that goggles, not googles...don't want to get in trouble with Google!