Clear Full Forecast

Canadian Mayors Get Tough Policy- A Good Move

By Ben Meisner

Monday, June 08, 2009 03:44 AM

The community of Halton Hills, Ontario, got the ball rolling which ended up in a call by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities to rap the Yanks on the hands over their protectionist market moves, while leaving their companies free to take what you can from the other markets of the world.

The move could potentially block US companies from bidding on city contracts across Canada. It all started when a Canadian company was outbid by a US firm in a Canadian bid, but a Canadian company was not able to bid in the US for its goods.

The vote may have been close, 189-175 with our Mayor Dan Rogers supporting the no side, it never the less sends a message. The free trade on lumber has been free trade only in name and aims to protect US producers. We are seeing American pulp mills being subsidized, while Canadian companies who dare do the same would be hit hard with duties.

Yes we do have a trade component going on with the USA, but we should keep in mind that the bulk of this trade is made up of natural resources, gas, oil, hydro electric power and minerals required for the production of finished goods. The US needs our products, and we, with a secure supply and a friendly border, are able to deliver it to them.

What we don’t need is a US government that says we will do what we want when it comes to trade and you will gladly follow us. The move by Canada’s Mayors sends a message that we are not all Yes men, we are prepared to stand up and be counted, and that time came long ago .

We did not cause the fall of the US economy, that came from within. If anything, it has cost the Canadian economy deeply and so if we feel the need to stand up and say treat us the same or face the consequences, then why not?

I’m Meisner and that’s one man’s opinion.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

I agree. Good move by the municipalities. Its the kind of grass roots politics I like to see in that the junior levels of government are setting their own agenda as to who does and does not get free trade access to our public dollars (better if it was local markets too). The federal government are globalists with no credibility on trade.

IMO the lower levels of government should have a greater say in what foreign jurisdictions can sell into the local market or procure government contracts from the local market.

Ideally I would like to see a new trade body set up with jurisdictions from the provincial/state level of government as its members. Members get free trade and non members get what federal governments allow for trade. Membership would require minimum standards in production, environment, safety, employment standards, and democratic rights. Ideally this body would shove aside the IMF (banksters) and the UN (tin pot dictator talk shop)in global legitimacy as the voice of the free people and the organization with the legitimacy to set international standards from the grass roots level. One vote per member prov/state in setting the policy standards. Canada would have 13 members.

What a joke.
Just a question here, but when the Canfor's of the world can buy crown lumber for less than FMV, would that not indirectly be a type of subsidy? Just curious.

Oh and regarding the policy noted above, I suppose it's a nice "rah rah" type of initiative. At the end of the day though, I doubt it will have any impact. Heck, I'd be surprised if the folks in the US even notice. They are too busy trying to stop their country from unwravelling at the seams, than to be worried about what some small town in Ontario, Saskatchewan or BC thinks about their domestic economic policy . . .
"The move could potentially block US companies from bidding on city contracts across Canada."

Totally illegal under NAFTA. And the USA knows it. So is their move to specify *American Only.*

Who has more clout? We rolled over when we signed the SLA with terms dictated by the USA.

It's like a mosquito trying to sting an elephant.
Eagleone, I think you missed the point of the mayor's actions. They arent trying to fight globalization or take control of who can sell into the local market. They are trying to fight a trade war in order to get MORE FREE TRADE. Not what you are wanting i dont think.
It isnt likely to do anything but it is hard to fault them.