First Nations Divided on Proposed Legislation
By 250 News
Thursday, June 18, 2009 03:58 AM
Prince George, B.C. - There are signs of growing opposition among First Nations towards the proposed Recognition and Reconciliation Act.
In an open letter to First Nations members, the Chief of the Carrier Sekani Tribal Council called the proposed legislation “a dead end” and has withdrawn all support for the current context of the proposed Recognition and Reconciliation Act. “There is no possibility of achieving a just reconciliation with the existing Discussion Paper” says the letter from David Luggi.
He is already on the record as saying the plan to hold 7 regional meetings with First Nations to discuss the act, is no where near enough. He also says there has been no consideration of any of the 6 recommendations the Carrier Sekani had presented. Those recommendations include requests for funding to help communities examine the impact of the legislation and to further develop the indigenous nations concept, and that the ratification process be one vote per band member. “The Carrier Sekani says that revenue and shared decision making should be negotiated first; business modeling and a business case developed” says Luggi. “ Currently we are experiencing massive on going infringements due to developments and alienation of lands in our territory. It’s a fair question for every community in Carrier Sekani. What is the proposed compensation package of the existing massive on-going infringements in our territory? Neither the First Nations Leadership Council, nor B.C. has an answer to that very basic and simple question.”
David Luggi is not alone in his opposition of the current Recognition and Reconciliation act, he says the Squamish, Wet'suwet'en, and Shuswap are on his side. “I just think the current discussion paper is trying to smoke some fast balls by us” says Luggi.
One of the first problems is that many First Nations don’t believe the Provincial Government has any jurisdiction to negotiate. “We have always asserted our right to self determination and to engage with the federal Crown on a Nation to Nation basis” reads part of a draft resolution from the St’at’imc Chief`s Council. With that in mind, the draft says there will be a test of the constitutional validity of the legislation and there will be pressure put on the Federal and Provincial Governments during the lead up time to the Olympics to ensure full recognition of Aboriginal Title and rights.
There are some signs of division among First Nations.
Chief Luggi alleges that during the most recent First Nations Summit in Vancouver, the First Nations Summit chairs and Task Group members refused the Carrier Sekani proposal and the First Nations Summit Chiefs in assembly were denied the opportunity to vote.
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home