Dangerous Goods Route Official
By 250 News
Tuesday, July 14, 2009 04:00 AM
Prince George, B.C. – The City of Prince George has given final reading to the Dangerous Goods Route Bylaw. The new rules will come into effect September 1st.
The bylaw which establishes the routes was given fourth and final reading last evening by Prince George City Council.
The bylaw sets aside the following roads (correlate with map) as dangerous goods routes:
A - Noranda Road,
B - Northwood Pulpmill Road,
C - P.G. Pulpmill Road,
D - Old Cariboo Highway,
E - First Avenue west of Victoria Street,
F - Cameron Street Bridge and
G - a section of North Nechako Road ( between the Cameron Street bridge and the Highway 97 interchange)
The provincial highways , 16 and 97 are already clear for dangerous goods transport, which means dangerous goods could be legally carried along Victoria Street in the heart of the city.
The new bylaw also sets fines:
"Every person who violates any provision of this Bylaw, or who permits, suffers of allows any act to be done in violation of any provisions of this Bylaw, or who neglects to do anything required to be done by any provisions of this Bylaw, commits an offence punishable upon summary conviction and is subject to a fine not less than $2,000 and not more than $10,000, or a term of imprisonment not exceeding six months, or both. "
1.Fail to transport dangerous goods on a designated dangerous goods route $200.00
2.Transporting dangerous goods in oversize/overweight vehicle on residential street $200.00
3.Stopping within the City $200.00
The bylaw takes effect September first to allow for signage and to advise user groups of the changes.
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home
If I have no dangerous goods to transport, do I "fail to transport dangerous goods on a designated dangerous goods route"? When it comes to the precise meaning of the words, of course I do!
Then it says this: "Every person who violates any provision of this Bylaw, or who permits, suffers of allows any act to be done in violation of any provisions of this Bylaw, or who neglects to do anything required to be done by any provisions of this Bylaw, commits an offence punishable upon summary conviction and is SUBJECT OT A FINE OF NOT LESS THAN $2,000 ....
That is then followed by 3 infractions which have a fine of less than the minimum $2,000.
It looks from the report (not having the actual by-law in front of me) that the bylaw is inernally inconsistent.