Clear Full Forecast

The Problem With Handguns

By Jack deWit

Friday, December 09, 2005 03:45 AM

by Jack deWit

Prime Minister Martin declared on December 7 that he would attempt to introduce legislation to place a ban on all handguns. Sounds nice in a campaign speech to urbanites, but is it realistic or just another pipe dream by a desperate politician?

It is another example of how a few hardcore criminals are giving our politicians an excuse to legislate another costly ineffective law. It is time that our governments attempted to govern Canada with laws that will benefit the majority of Canadians. The banning of handguns would effectively make thousands of lawful gun owners criminals by the stroke of a pen as it did with the recent firearm registration program. The law already requires all handguns be registered. So the police will simply use this registry of legal handguns to collect and destroy lawfully owned firearms. Will this get handguns off the street?

How many lawful handgun owners are walking our streets with their firearms strapped under their shoulder or tucked in their belts? How many registered handgun owners are going to commit a robbery? So who is really going to be effected by a total ban on handguns? I sure don’t think the criminal element will be dramatically concerned with such a ban.

Let’s look at some bona fide facts.
• The majority of handguns used in crime are smuggled or stolen firearms. These firearms would not be registered to the user in any case. So how would the police be able to collect these guns should such a ban be legislated?
• Is it reasonable for thousands of legal owners to give up a hobby and their expensive guns if such a ban is not effective? Moreover, would there be any reimbursement to the owners by the government.
• Most guns used in crimes are of the rapid firing semi-automatic type that expels the spent cartridges out of the gun and to the ground. This effectively leaves crucial evidence as the projectile can be traced to the firearm it was shot out of. A revolver retains the spent cartridges in the cylinder. It seems that with most criminal acts the perpetrator either doesn’t know this or they simply don’t give a care.
• Like it or not, most criminal acts involving handguns are committed by Asian, East Indian, and other crime related groups. It seems that these cultures have made handgun use very popular in recent years.

So why should a Canadian citizen who has legally owned a handgun for many years be subjected to an ineffective legislation banning the ownership of such a firearm? The simple answer is, he shouldn’t. It is time that our politicians realized where the problems arise. The time has come where our government must get tough with those who use guns in the commission a crime.

Here are some of my solutions to the present gun problem;
• Have a national referendum attached to the ballot to allow Canadians the right to decide if the death penalty should be reinstated.
• All crimes (where there is no injury to victims) committed by non-Canadians shall lead to an automatic deportation order with no appeals.
• All convicted criminals using firearms receive a minimum penalty of 10 years if no victims are injured.
• If a victim is injured the penalty would be a minimum of 20 years.
• In the case of a death, where the court finds the subject guilty of manslaughter, the convicted criminal would serve a true-life sentence. For a convicted 1st or 2nd degree murder, the suspect would be sentenced to death.
• The preferred jail time punishment would be served by doing hard labour for the duration of their sentence.
• All jail terms would be served for the full sentence given.

It is time to get tough. The above punishments would create results! Crime, and especially those committed with illegal guns, is a direct result of our federal government failing to take appropriate action when necessary. This is not a new problem. It has been brewing for years while the government ignores the ramifications of its own inaction.

Let’s re-establish a prison system that will aid in creating employment for our hardworking Canadians and get our criminals off the streets. Leave legal gun owners alone. The responsibility of public safety is at stake. The government must act now with a manageable public safety strategy. Banning of handguns does not fit into this category!

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Right punish most law abiding citizens and ban all hand guns. The saying goes...."Guns don't kill, people do" That is where the root cause is, crooks and illegal handguns.
I have carried a gun,a rifle for 25 years while in the Infantry then Airborne Infantry.I have had a Firearm licence since they came out, I have owned Pistols and revolvers for 40 years...NEVER HURT ANY ON WITH THEM, SO TAKING MY FIRARMS IS GOING TO STOP LOWLIFES FROM SHOOTING ONE ANOTHER WITH ILLEGAL PISTOLS.....BULL.....Now I HAVE become a bad Guy, because I obey the law, and because THEY ARE LOW LIFES GANG MEMBERS can be Armed with ILLEGAL PISTOLS,BUT DON MACKENZIE AFTER 40 YEARS IS UNTRUST WORTHY...BULL AGAIN..
The author proposed:

"Have a national referendum attached to the ballot to allow Canadians the right to decide if the death penalty should be reinstated."

I do nto quite understand what this would solve. You know as well as I do that the USA has the death penalty in many states. Thus, based on what I think you are suggesting, the rate of murders, especially using handguns (that is the issue here) should be less in the US than in Canada which, of course, it is not by a considerable margin.

"All crimes (where there is no injury to victims) committed by non-Canadians shall lead to an automatic deportation order with no appeals."

Do you mean all crimes involving hand guns ... or do you also include crimes such as fraud? If so, what does that have to do with the topic of handguns?

"All convicted criminals using firearms receive a minimum penalty of 10 years if no victims are injured."

Sounds good to me. Those who are savvy but can't kick the crime habit will start to use knives.

"If a victim is injured the penalty would be a minimum of 20 years."

Again, sounds good, and criminals will begin to use other weapons.

"In the case of a death, where the court finds the subject guilty of manslaughter, the convicted criminal would serve a true-life sentence."

Manslaughter?

"For a convicted 1st or 2nd degree murder, the suspect would be sentenced to death."

You forgot that we do nothave the death penalty. I think we first have to do the voting thing and I suspect that the country will not go for it, realizing fully that if Canada were loike the US and the criminal law was in the hands of the provinces, that Alberta would most certainly have the death penalty.

"The preferred jail time punishment would be served by doing hard labour for the duration of their sentence"

Hard labour? Trying to figure out what that would be these days.

"All jail terms would be served for the full sentence given."

In handgun cases or all others as well? ...
Like, gee Martin, just ban handguns from the criminals, to make sure you got em all, check the billion dollar registry. They should all be there, right??!!
By the way Jack, you're on the right track IMO.
As we know the Gun Registry did not work. It cost over a billion dollars and was recently funded another 70 million to continue through 2005.

They would have you believe that over 7 million guns have been registered, however this number is suspect. In any event I think that it is reasonable to assume that at least 2 to 3 million guns (Rifles) have not been registered, and will not be registered. Some people in Alberta including an M.L.A. flatly refused to register their guns and of course no action was taken against them.

This is a failed policy that was inacted by the Liberals after the tragic shootings in Montreal and was for political gain only. The same thing now applies to the hand gun issue. Hand guns are legally required to be registered in Canada since the `1960's and as far as I know most law abiding citizens have registered their handguns. This is strictly a political ploy by Paul Martin to give the impression to voters in large metropolitian areas like, Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver that he is doing something about the killings that have been going on in these cities. He actually hasnt done a thing.

We all know that this is B.S. and law abiding citizens will be the only ones affected by the B.S. legislation, the same as the Gun Registry.

Now the question is; Will the Liberal Candidate in this riding(If they come up with one) run on the issues of confiscating handguns, being in favour of stealing tax payers money, sending Canadians to war in Afghanistan without public debate, or any legal reason for being their, fighting under USA command, transferring money from the EU fund to general revenues (40 Billion dollars over the last 10/15 years so that they can show a surplus and pass it along to their friends, get rid of the GST, or will he come up with a bunch of new baloney for us to listen to.

Anyone who is thinking of voting for Paul Martin and his league of turncoats and unsavoury characters, should give it some serious thought, as it should now be pretty obvious that these guys are losers of the highest order. If they are representative of Canada then we are in serious trouble.

Its time for a change.
Jack you have my vote.

Owl, you raised the issue of knives. I say bring it on. Anyone who has a simple carpenters hammer under their seat has nothing to worry about. Are they going to outlaw the carpenters hammer next?

IMO Paul Martin's policy empowers the criminals and makes criminals out of law abiding Canadian citizens.
>Anyone who is thinking of voting for Paul Martin and his league of turncoats and unsavoury characters, should give it some serious thought, as it should now be pretty obvious that these guys are losers of the highest order. If they are representative of Canada then we are in serious trouble. <

Now what? Vote for the other leagues of turncoats and unsavoury characters? Shucks.

" The strife of politics tends to unsettle the calmest understanding, and ulcerate the most benevolent heart. There are no bigotries or absurdities too gross for parties to create or adopt under the stimulus of political passions."
Edwin Percy Whipple (1819-18860.

It's been going on for a long, long time.