Exit B.C.'s Red Serge Road
Sunday, September 20, 2009 05:21 AM
Justice Wallace Gilby Craig ( retired)
A photograph is worth a thousand words, particularly when viewed subjectively as a prediction of future events.
That’s thought occurred to me when I looked at the front page of the Aug 26 British Columbia section in The Globe and Mail.
I was transfixed by John Lehmann’s eye-catching colour photograph – headlined The Road Into the Red – showing a smiling Premier Gordon Campbell greeting Lieutenant-Governor Steven Point on red-carpeted steps leading into the legislature.
The magnificence of the photograph is not Campbell greeting Point; rather it is the dazzling resplendence of two seasoned RCMP officers exuding pride of place in the unfolding pageantry. They stand at attention on either side of the red carpet, a cavalry officer’s sabre held smartly against their left legs. The scene is one of pomp and camaraderie.
Although the road-into-the-red headline refers to the ballooning provincial debt, yet the symbolism of two officers in red-serge standing protectively on either side of our autocratic Premier is an omen that E Division of the RCMP will soon be awarded another 20-year extension of its contract to serve as British Columbia’s provincial police.
So what, you say?
Well, here’s what: By contracting to assign at least one third of its members to British Columbia to do municipal and provincial policing, the RCMP renders itself incapable of performing its paramount national policing duties.
In 2005, the Auditor General of Canada reported to the House of Commons that “there is a distinct difference in vacancy patterns between federal and contract policing activities. Since 2001, the RCMP has for the most part met its contractual obligations to provide the required number of peace officers to its clients, but has done so to the detriment of staffing its federal policing activities. We found vacancy rates of as much as 25 percent in certain federal policing units – including drug interdiction and organized crime – located in contract provinces.”
In 2007, the federal government released A Matter of Trust, a report by an independent investigator relating to RCMP pension and insurance plans. That report raised serious issues concerning the culture and governance of the RCMP. The feds immediately appointed a five-member task force, chaired by David A Brown Q.C., to look into the issues raised in A Matter of Trust. On Dec.14, 2007, Brown delivered the committee’s report, Rebuilding the Trust, to then minister of public safety Stockwell Day.
The committee emphasized that “the issues demanding the most urgent attention related to the impossible demands being placed on members and employees; demands that are compromising their health and safety. We also heard with remarkable consistency about major problems with the discipline system, recruitment, performance evaluations, promotion and personal development. We also witnessed the dedication and consuming pride members and employees have in their Force. … A new approach to the organization of the Force and its governance structure is essential, and a new independent body is needed for complaints and oversight of the RCMP.”
Then the committee went beyond its terms of reference, commenting that “Much has been said and written about the complexity of the RCMP given the organization’s law enforcement responsibilities in Canada and abroad. It would therefore not be unreasonable to argue that some or all of the solution to issues confronting the Force rest in breaking it up. Such a consideration would require a much broader public policy debate as to the police model which best suits Canada and best serves Canadians. Such a debate is not within the mandate of this Task Force.”
So, folks, maybe it’s time for British Columbia to phase out RCMP contract policing, a move that will force the federal government to restructure the RCMP and make it an independent federal police agency primarily engaged in protecting Canadians against terrorists and international criminal organizations; and management of a national crime lab and identification services and protective security for members of the federal government and judiciary.
Surely, there must be somebody in our provincial cabinet with the courage to explain to Campbell that his government is burdened, exclusively, with a constitutional duty under section 92 of the British North America Act to administer justice. “The administration of justice in the Province” includes policing; and there is not doubt about that whatsoever.
In my opinion it would be constitutional misfeasance if the Campbell government continued to employ E Division of the RCMP as our provincial police for another 20 years. It would be more of the same: no accountability under our Police Act; no accountability to Campbell and our provincial solicitor general.
It is our right to be masters of our own provincial policing.
It is our provincial government’s duty to actualize that right.
Do your duty, Mr. Premier; nothing more, nothing less.
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home
Unfortunately,it may be a tradition that has run it's course.
Somebody in there has screwed it all up.
The fact that none of our elected representatives,provincial or federal, have been unwilling to speak out and insist on an accounting of what is happening within the upper reaches of the RCMP and with the force itself,has only led to even more scepticism and doubt.
Are they still worthy of our trust?
The rank and file membership may be,but not those at the top.
They are the ones who have done the damage and it is the members on street who are paying the price for it.
If this 20 year contract is awarded with no acccounting for what has happened to the RCMP,nothing will change for the better.
They will continue to act as if they have a god given right to police Canada and it's citizens,and they will do it the way THEY want,with no outside accountability.
Given their track record over the last few years,we may regret that.
We already know we have very little protection from anything the RCMP chooses to do.
Go up against them for their actions and we will lose,and we see it continually.
We have no protection from bad policing and we should insist on an accounting of what they plan to do about that before any contract is awarded.
Or do they plan to do anything?