Clear Full Forecast

Report From Parliament's Hill- Sept 18th, 2009

By Prince George - Peace River M.P. Jay Hill

Friday, September 18, 2009 03:45 AM

“Conservative Government Extends EI Benefits for Long-tenured Workers”
 
The global economic recession has brought about job losses around the world.  Some industries have been hit harder than others. 
 
Here in Prince George-Peace River for example we’ve seen how especially difficult it has been for many forestry workers who’ve been employed in the same industry or company or even the same mill, over many years, without ever needing Employment Insurance (EI). Now, as the forest sector struggles to recover, they face the challenge of transitioning to a completely different industry before their EI benefits run out.
 
Our Conservative Government knows that these long-tenured workers need even more time to weather the economic downturn and find suitable employment.  Throughout the summer we were busy listening to Canadians’ ideas about how to help long-tenured workers with the intent to table a bill as soon as Parliament resumed sitting.
 
And so this week, Bill C-50 was tabled to help long-tenured workers who have lost their jobs because of the global economic downturn, by temporarily providing an additional 5 to 20 weeks of EI regular benefits, depending upon how long they have been working and paying EI premiums.
 
This measure will go a long way towards helping local forestry workers but it’s not exclusive to their industry.  A long-tenured worker is someone who has contributed to the EI program (paid at least 30% of the annual maximum EI premiums) for at least seven out of ten calendar years AND has received regular EI benefits for no more than 35 weeks in the last five years. 
 
It’s estimated that approximately 190,000 long-tenured workers in Canada will benefit from this temporary measure, which will be phased out gradually as the economy improves.
This initiative builds upon the creation by our Conservative Government earlier this year of the Career Transition Assistance program to provide earlier or extended EI regular benefits to long-tenured workers participating in training so that they can transition to a new industry or occupation.
 
Also as part of Canada’s Economic Action Plan, we further responded to the needs of long-tenured workers in vulnerable sectors by extending and increasing access to EI Work-sharing agreements (WSA’s) so that more employees can continue to work while companies experience a temporary shut-down.  These extended WSA’s have been particularly helpful to local mills and workers.
 
We have made many other reforms to the EI system, some permanent and some temporary in light of the current global economic downturn.  Out-of-work Canadians now have easier access to EI, they’re receiving EI benefits sooner and they’re eligible for EI benefits for a longer period of time.  We are doing all of this without increasing the payroll tax burden on workers and businesses through a two-year temporary freeze on EI premiums.
 
To ensure the long-term prosperity of unemployed workers, our additional investments to expand the training available to EI recipients totals more than $1-Billion over the next two years.
 
While there has recently been a “light at the end of the tunnel” for Canada’s economic recovery, our Conservative Government wants to ensure that when we finally do emerge from this challenge that our industries, businesses AND our workers are prepared “better-than-ever” to compete and succeed!
 

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

With headlines like the following one in the news lately, I think people should be saving every cent they possibly can. It looks to me like the debt fueled party we have been enjoying for the last several decades is finally over and the hangover (the deleveraging process) is starting.

US credit shrinks at Great Depression rate prompting fears of double-dip recession

Both bank credit and the M3 money supply in the United States have been contracting at rates comparable to the onset of the Great Depression since early summer, raising fears of a double-dip recession in 2010 and a slide into debt-deflation.

If anyone wishes to read this entire article the following is the link to it.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/recession/6190818/US-credit-shrinks-at-Great-Depression-rate-prompting-fears-of-double-dip-recession.html
Good advice charles!
It does seem there is a concerted effort being made to convince people in general that all is well once again,or at least getting better fast,so hey...relax and spend money!
I don't believe a word of it.
I'll hang on to my cash.
This is not over!
Thank you to you all for the good information that you have shared. I also think that we are told the oposite to what is really happening and that it WILL get a lot worse. I feel sorry for the regular average American people. Their government has let them down with all the greed and coruption there. I also believe that all levels of our own government is filled with coruption, greed and over spending. The tax payer group is getting smaller and the poor and government workers living off of our dime is increasing. They can only tax us so much....then what?
Also, has anyone heard of Bill C6 that is being pushed through our government? If not look it up because it is not in the main stream news and IT WILL take away some of our rights.
Have a nice weekend all. :}
CaringSoul. How can the Government **Push** through any legislation, when they have a minority. Wouldnt the Grand Coalition of Liberals, NDP, and Bloc stop this legislation if it was bad??? Maybe they are all working together behind the scenes to put it through???? or maybe it is not as bad as some would have you think.

Notice that the illustrious Mr. Hill failed to mention that the Liberal Government stole 40 Billion dollars from the EI fund, and the Conservatives took an additional 12 Billion before they brought in new legislation to stop Government from skimming the EI Fund into General Revenues.

Hill is trying to convince us that by giving the workers better EI Benefits from the money that they and business paid into the fund, he is somehow doing us a favour. What a bunch of crap. Its our money coming back to us plain and simple.

I do not agree that people should be able to access EI after 360 hours of work, like the Libs, Ndp, and Bloc would like, however on the other hand I support giving boni fide workers good benefits in time of need.

Mr Hill should give us some credit for having a brain.
Here are the links: Make up your own mind.
I just wanted to share the information. I do not know how to answer any of your questions.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7_0HlCwb8A

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ud4bYJXIrAE

http://www.farrow.com/new-pdfs4/bill_c-6_canada_consumer_product_safety_act_feb_09.pdf

http://nhppa.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/discussion_paper_on_bill_c-61.pdf

http://people.mcgill.ca/files/stamatia.piper/TechSocietyPipeda.pdf
I think we really need all the "bad" news we can get. The more of that we get, the longer it will take to get out of the doldrums and the happier the naysayers will be because they get to say "we told you so".

Has anyone ever considered the notion of a self fulfilling prohecy in all of this?

http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=1889793

So who is right and why? Come on Charles, Andyfrreeze and Caring Soul. Give us your opinion as to who is right and why?
"I also believe that all levels of our own government is filled with coruption, greed and over spending"

I see that every day. I also see it every day in private industry. And then there are all those people I know. Bunch of cheats, all of them. It has become the only way our population can get along. Dog eat Dog world out there!! I'm buying a gun!!

I wish I could live in Afghanistan!!
Thanks for the a propos cartoon Wolfie. :-)
"Notice that the illustrious Mr. Hill failed to mention that the Liberal Government stole 40 Billion dollars from the EI fund, and the Conservatives took an additional 12 Billion before they brought in new legislation to stop Government from skimming the EI Fund into General Revenues."

Palopu. Talkin' out of both sides of your mouth again? Did you not suggest that the Provincial government should do the same with ICBC funds?
Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People.

RBC announced 1.56 Billion Profit for the 3rd quarter. 5 Major banks shared in 4.4 Billion in PROFITS for the 3rd quarter.

And now our government has to borrow more from from the banks. All of our money is going to government or the banks.

Gus. Better to talk out of both sides of your mouth rather than from the top of your head.

If you read my post correctly (obviously you didnt) you would see that I questioned why ICBC would have 7 to 9 billion in investments, and if they did then it could be transferred to the Government to pay down the deficit.

This money was accumulated from people who have been paying more than necessary for Insurance. The alternative would be to return the money to those who paid it, however that is not likely to happen

The real point I was trying to make is that I suspect that ICBC has invested most of this money in Government Bonds, and therefore the Provincial Government already has it, and they may or may not ever pay back ICBC. So in effect it is an investment on paper only.

This is merely speculation on my part, maybe those who are more learned, or connected could figure out exactly where this $7 billion dollars is, and maybe they could also find out how many other Billions of dollars in investments from WCB, BCHydro, BC Ferries, etc; are out there.
I tend to agree with Gus when he writes about the "naysayers" and the creation of a "self-fulfilling prophecy".

Tell me, but please think about it first, carefully, in regards to "money" is a country "richer" by what it "saves", or by what it "spends"?

If we all started "saving" every dollar we could spare over and above obtaining the most meagre standard of living possible, would we really be "richer"?

Now maybe I've got it all wrong, but it was always my impression that the only thing "money" was any good for was for what it would "buy".

This presumes, I think, that there is always going to be something TO "buy" with it on the market. But if no one is spending any more than they absolutely have to, how long do any of you think there WILL be anything to "buy"?
I don't believe all the ICBC 'surplus' would be invested in BC government bonds. When the NDP was in office, I seem to recall it was revealed that ICBC had invested heavily in financing a major shopping centre in the lower mainland. Metrotown, perhaps?

And if they're like most insurers likely their portfolio of investments would be quite diversified.

I don't really see why, except for possibly some detrimental liability for Federal income taxes, that ICBC couldn't be converted to a "mutual" insurance company instead of being a Crown corporation.

Where the policyholders are also the shareholders, and receive dividends directly from funds that accumulate over and above the actuarial necessities of sound coverage.

Why should the "government" get the benefits from ICBC's investment of the excess of premiums it removes from us, and the revenues from these investments?

Such a move might provide a very sound incentive towards 'safe driving', since it would be we who would reap the direct benefits as individual policy/shareholders.