Clear Full Forecast

Final Flood Mitigation Report Recommends $44 Million in Projects

By 250 News

Monday, October 05, 2009 10:08 PM

 
Prince George, B.C.- City Council has received the final report from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants on flood mitigation, and the recommendations carry a very heft price tag.
 
In all, the work that would need to be done is estimated at nearly $44 million dollars.
 
The first three actions that will be taken are, selection of a freeboard allowance (giving a water level “cushion”) revising the floodplain and the preparation of erosion hazard mapping.  Combined, the three projects carry a price tag of about $45 thousand dollars.
 
The freeboard allowance would be  the construction level over and above the new floodplain  marks.  The floodplain  will change and Councilor Garth Frizzell  is  concerned  about what a .6 metre freeboard would mean financially to property owners when it comes to things like  insurance rates.
 
Other recommended “investigative” projects carry a price tag of about $170 thousand dollars:
• Install pump-test well/level gauges for Area AN to assess groundwater ($42,500)
• Install water-level gauges & develop winter flow monitoring program ($70,000)
• Develop ice-related flood forecast procedures and public notification policy ($20,000)
• Develop freshet forecasting procedures ($25,000)
• Monitor river bed at confluence ($15,000)
• Monitor future impacts on flood flows (minimal cost)
 
It is the "area specific" work that carries the big price tag, much of which is related to “land use changes” namely purchasing  the land from the current owners:
 
1. Area AN – Nechako South Bank at Confluence:
Setback dike ($300,000 engineering; $15.5 M Class D)
2. Area CF – Fraser West Bank at Hudson’s Bay Slough West of Queensway:
Check adequacy of existing protection ($10,000 engineering)
3. Area CN – Nechako North Bank near Confluence:
Land-use change and local floodproofing ($50,000 engineering; $9.3 M Class D)
4. Area DN – Nechako North Bank West of John Hart Bridge:
Raise Preston Road (if supported by further investigations) and/or local
floodproofing/land-use change ($100,000 engineering; $4 M Class D – assuming road
is raised)
5. Area BF – Fraser West Bank at South Fort George:
Local floodproofing/land-use change ($20,000 engineering; $2.9 M Class D)
6. Area BN – Nechako North Bank East of John Hart Bridge
Building/infrastructure inventory and wet floodproofing ($25,000 engineering)
7. Area EN – Nechako North Bank at Morning Place:
Local floodproofing/land-use change ($15,000 engineering; $1.4 M Class D)
8. Area DF – Fraser West Bank at Lansdowne South End:
Local floodproofing/land-use change ($5,000 engineering; $0.8 M Class D)
9. Area GN – Nechako South Bank between John Hart and Foothills Bridges
Infrastructure inventory ($5,000 engineering)
10. Area FN – Nechako South Bank at Foot Hills Bridge
Infrastructure inventory ($5,000 engineering)
11. Area FF – Fraser West Bank at Northwood Pulpmill Road
Inventory and raising of Landooz Road ($5,000 engineering & predesign; $5.8 M
Class D)
12. Area GF – Fraser West Bank across from Shelley
Water Survey Canada gauge check ($0)
13. Area AF – Fraser West Bank at Yellowhead Highway
Infrastructure inventory ($5,000-engineering)
14. Area EF – Fraser West Bank at Island upstream of Confluence
Confirm extent of revised floodplain relative to housing ($0)
 
A further project which the City would like to see done is the enlarging of the Cottonwood Island side-channel.   That project is estimated to be just under $4 million dollars.
 
As for funding, the Staff report suggests some projects can start immediately as operational funds for infrastructure planning in the current fiscal year allow.
 
If Council gives its approval, the big ticket items for specific areas will be included in the City’s Capital Expenditure Plan, but the source for those dollars has yet to be determined. There may be some money available through the Province’s Emergency Management Flood Protection Program, but the Province has already stated, on more than one occasion, that it will not provide money for the expropriation of properties.
 
Council has directed Administration to move ahead on three projects, (freeboard allowance, revision of floodplain mapping, preparation of erosion hazard mapping) and has directed Staff  to :
A)   Apply for applicable funding for erosion hazard mapping, and
B)   Include in the capital expenditure Plan the area specific projects in order of priority and available funding
 
With winter  coming on, Mayor  Dan Rogers wanted some sort of  comfort  as to what has been learned so some concerns could be  alleviated.  Monika Mannerstrom of Northwest Hydraulics says she doesn't have a crystal ball, but they do know you have to have flows  in the Nechako of more than 200 cubic meters per second and minus 5 temperatures for 10 to 20 days.  "The cold temperatures, your guess is as good as mine.  The flows  have been quite low, the reserevoir is  quite low, I would be quite surprised if the  flows were high this year."

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Manitoba built a huge by-pass canal in order to contain flood waters. BC tax payers would want dual use structures - preferably with power generation capacity - before they would finance same.

We have to think of mega-projects here because the problem will only get worse with global warming, which involves increased evaporation/rain falls.

I would like to see more extravagent engineering reports. Solutions posed are noble, but seem piecemeal.
@swami99 - Duff's Ditch? Duff Roblin was chastised mercilessly for years for building the floodway.

I was there in 1997 during the Flood of the Century - I'm sure glad he had the vision in the 1960s or there would be no Winnipeg today.
"We have to think of mega-projects here because the problem will only get worse with global warming,"

I agree. I like thinking.

I think we should seriously look at creating a navigation canal using the Fraser. That would open up this area with a true inland port. Just look at the use of waterways in other parts of the world and the economic growth they have created along their shores. A few lift locks in the right places and we can overcome the 600 or so metre drop to the coast easily.
Yah, I might bite a mega-project solution. They don't always work:

http://www.weirdasianews.com/2009/02/09/north-koreas-ryugyong-hotel-ugliest-earth/
The pyramids were not built in a day, neither were the cathedrals of the world.

What's the hurry?

The Sagrada Familia Cathedral has been under construction for over 125 years.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/shadowcaster57/2226067358

The Koreans have a long way to go to catch up to the Spanish.

Which one is ugglier is a matter of opinion.
44 mil for flood mitigation;
100 mil for a cancer facility;
40 mil for RCMP building;
Boundry Road??$

Soon we will be talking big Money
Raise Preston Road? How totally asinine.
There is absolutely no need to raise Preston Road. Residents that had flooded basements on Preston had the water come in from the ground due to ice backed up and jammed on the river and therefore the water took the path of least resistance and pushed its way through the water table and up. Preston Road has never had water compromising it because of flooding. This is a blatant waste of taxpayers money and just solidifies to me that the City is totally out to lunch on flood mitigation with Preston Road for just starters.

Who gets the contracts for all of this?
Who prospers from all the needless, useless,counter measures that are being proposed? We've had two bad flood situations in the last 30 years, due to...
a Corporation who likes to liken the situation to an act of God. Yes, we have experienced minor flooding in years gone by, but it doesn't call for all this money being thrown at a problem that can be easily solved by dredging the mouth of the Fraser and getting an ongoing dialogue going with said Corporation to make sure their practices can't negatively impact the citizens down river and to ensure we won't have to endure another "act of God" or at least getting some lawyers to have a look at culpability,if any and then to set some guidelines and ensure compliance. Yes, there are acts of God like ice jams and high flow due to weather and its good to be prepared, however some of this stuff is simply over the top and will be costing the taxpayer needlessly.
Out to lunch as usual. If the drain for you bathtub is partially blocked,so that the water does not flow out quickly (like the confluence of the Nechako & Fraser ) and your taps are leaking say 10% more water in than is flowing out ( such as we would see when the confluence begins to freeze and water starts to back up ) What would you do? How about calling in a troop of consultants and engineers who, for a fee, decide the best mitigation for the situation is to raise the height of the top of your bath tub. Then you have your relatives ( no consultants or engineers or politicians, just plain folk who somehow manage to go through life without much advice from experts ) They say "hey, stupid, why don't you fix the drainage problem"? and if you don't understand, they show you, let the water flow out faster than it is running in and you won't have a flooding problem, bozo!

The moral of the diatribe is "DREDGE THE CONFLUENCE"
metalman.