Clear Full Forecast

What You Want, What You Get

By 250 News

Monday, December 19, 2005 08:45 PM

City  Staff have been busy matching up results of surveys with the activities of  their various departments.  Here are some of the highlights of the report:

Survey says  residents (55%) support  increasing taxes to maintain services at current levels or to enhance or expand services.
Corporate Services is developing a  draft budget for 2006 that would  call for a 2.4% increase in general and snow taxes.  City Manager George Paul noted the 2.4% suggested hike will no doubt be under intense debate during budget  discussion, but that figure was chosen because it represents the rate of inflation in B.C.

Survey says  you like user fees and getting money from corporate sponsorships and gaming.
The Finance and Audit committee will  be asked to consider a number of user fee increases.

Survey says transportation, road repairs, and a dangerous goods route are your priorities.
City says "department has developed an excellent pavement management system and extra effort will be made to address  growth and transportation of dangerous goods."

Survey says air quality is a major concern for 66%.
City  is  continuing its work with  air quality stakeholders through the air quality management planning process.

Survey says public appetite for recycling is growing
City will continue working with Regional District of Fraser Fort George to develop overall  waste management plan.

Survey says public supports public Transit
City says  it is currently monitoring service performance

Survey says most  are satisfied with the parks and trails.
City says it will pursue resources for enhanced trails and parks maintenance, and will set up a trails task force.

Survey says there are issues  about seniors mobility and pedestrian infrastructure
City says it recognizes the challenges.

Survey says most residents are happy with Leisure Services
City says there is a clear sensitivity to costs, and Leisure Services needs to be  aware of that.

The survey results were based on survey phone calls to 300 residents.





Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

You have to wonder how the questions were put, and how much coaching was given to those answering the questions.
Im sure that 55% would support no increase in taxes to maintain services at current levels.

The actual increase in general and snow taxes of 2.4% is unwarranted, however because of this **spend it all** Council they need more money.

User fees are only good to a point after that they become detrimental. Would they dare attach a user fee to the hockey fans at CN Centre. This Centre presently costs $300,000.00 per year to operate. With attendence falling and heating costs rising it can only go up.

Gaming should be a non-starter, in the end it causes more problems that it will ever solve.

Corporate sponsorship is thinly disguised corporate prostitution. It gives Corporations a venue to pretend they are good Corporate Citizens. Its interesting to note that Kamloops Arena got a Corporate Sponsor for 10 years at $1.2 Million ($120,000.00 per year) with an option for another 5 years, while we got one for the CN Centre for $1.3 Million ($86,000.00 per year) over 15 years with an option for a further 10 years. Looks like we need new negotiators.

We all know that road repairs are priorities, we have been telling this to City Hall for years. The Dangerous Goods thing will never happen, because most people in this town couldnt even tell you where or what the Dangerous Good are.
Air Quality Duh?? Recycling Duh??

Public transit is a necessary evil, however it is very expensive, and they should be working hard to find a way to reduce costs.

Is it possible for Opinion 250 to take a survey of 300 people and ascertain what their positions are on these issues when the questions are given by someone other than those associated with the City.

There has to be a better way to get public opinion on some of these issues.
Bottom line is this .... if one reads waht the survey says, and what the city's reaction to each one is ... how many do you count where the survey point of view is met by the city action ....???

not too many by my count ...

example:
"Survey says there are issues about seniors mobility and pedestrian infrastructure."

response: "City says it recognizes the challenges." .... and will be doing what about it?????

example two:
"Survey says most are satisfied with the parks and trails."

response is: "City says it will pursue resources for enhanced trails and parks maintenance, and will set up a trails task force."

So, if the public is happy, then why is the city pursuing resources for better maintenance?

I mean, I would like to see better maintenance, but that is not waht thesurvey says according to the information providfed here .....

so, when do we listen to the survey, and when do we not? .... is this a coin toss decision? .... or does the City do these surveys because they feel they have to? ....

I mean, I hope the Russians were here to watch this bit of futile democracy at work .....
I'd like to see a map with red dots on it for the locations of residents they called. Bet the calls didn't get any further than the city limits that existed in 1942.
Here we go again!!!
Yes-we all want our taxes to go up, so the city can waste more money.
Hope whoever released this garbage kissed the "blarney stone" while doing so!!!
Sure we are happy with Leisure Services, and especially Milburn-cause after all, did he not cover the Mayor's butt with all those extra signs, which convinced the brilliant voters in Prince George to vote him back in.
Joke of the week---no new Cameron Street Bridge in the foreseeable future.
Hart residents in joyful mood-maybe wishing they could recast ballot????
Whatever priorities this Mayor and Council set yesterday, have become history as of today!!!!
After the snow tax, comes the rain tax, then we must get into a sunshine and moon tax!!!
Or is that "snow tax" just an example as to how well they can "snow" us once again????
it seems to that for the city to even manage a survey has failed. i guess it depends on who you survey. i guess the old saying is true, figures lie and liars figure
Palopu, you are absolutely correct about the public transit thing. We need it, but we do not need the large buses they have at this time. We could use smaller ones that carry 20 to 30 people much like shuttle buses that carry people from the Vancouver Airport to various hotels throughout the lower mainland. Rarely have I seen more than 10 people on one of our city buses at one time. These huge buses of ours must have a capacity of at least 60. Imagine the fuel savings alone.
Oh my gosh, did I not read they passed the million rider mark??? And I bet they only went $400,000.00 in the RED.
Smaller vehicles have been discussed numerous times, and they must realize the absolute waste in running those large buses with so few people aboard, but I can only assume they have not allotted a couple hundred grand for a "STUDY."
Take heart-it will be forthcoming.
Please do not expect any changes after the study tho'.
Ignorance is bliss, so we are blessed with a happy lot at city hall.
I do so wish you posters would stop being so logical and sensible.
You are forcing me to think, and it does become rather taxing mentally this time of year!!!
Damn-I hate that word-taxing!!!