Clear Full Forecast

Special Health Protection Bylaw Falls Flat

By 250 News

Monday, March 29, 2010 10:00 PM

Prince George, B.C. – Councillor Deborah Munoz was counting on her   Prince George colleagues to support  two motions she believes would help reduce fine particulate in the City’s Airshed. 
 
First, she called for Council, to call on the Provincial Ministry of the Environment to declare Prince George a “sensitive Airshed” and commit the necessary resources to help alleviate the air quality problems in Prince George.
 
Councillor Stolz  says he is not able to support the motions because there is not enough information. He asked if Councilor Munoz had spoken with Ministry of the Environment  about about  the  costs involved with the management of a  "sensitive airshed"  or if  she had held discussions with staff  as they were developing the latest clean air bylaw.  The answer to both questions was no.
 
Councillor Brian Skakun says  he worries about the politics involved in the motion"No one wants to say they don't support  clean air, but there isn't enough information, there's nothing about the costs involved or the implications."
 
Councillor Garth Frizzell  says he too supports having clean air,  but  says  he is of the understanding the Mininstry ofthe Environme3nt already considers  Prince George as having a sensitive airshed,  "Everyyone wants clean air, we have a bowl that won't flush, but this motion  may be asking  for something that  has already been done."
 
Councillors Sheri Green and Murry Krause  both agree that while everyone cares about clean air,  there are no specifiics about what it means to be  a sensitive airshed or  what costs or resources are needed.
 
Mayor Dan Rogers says he thinks it is  valuable to ask if  being declared a sensitive airshed would help or hinder the community.  That being said,  Councillors  voted to defer the matter to staff for more information on the possible benefits or  costs.
 
Part two of Councillor Munoz's  motion called on her colleagues to support the development of a  “Health Protection Air Quality Bylaw” to “specifically assess and control the health effects of major emissions of fine particulate matter”. She points to the City of Oakville Ontario as an example of the type of bylaw that could be developed.
 
In her presentation to Council, Munoz says she understands municipalities  may adopt additional, or more stringent standards in its laws to control pollution.
 
Councillor Stolz says there is a huge  financial liability connected with this kind of  move " If we take this on, there is a huge  financial cost to us, plus there is litigation."  Stolz says  the City of Vancouver spends millions of dollars on their  bylaw and  in court costs fighting  industry "This costs millions of dollars and  not one dollar comes from the  Province. 
We could take the money being proposed for this and replace every wood stove in the City of Prince George."
 
Councillor Brian Skakun says once again,  voting against this  motion could be  misconstrued as not supporting an effort to have cleaner air "That is not  the case, but we have no information, and it's unfair to ask Council to make a decision when there is no report from staff and no  clear information  on  what this would mean."
 
Council Dave Wilbur  says he supports working for cleaner air, but  supporting this motion would be "A self inflicted  wound of downloading".  Wilbur says there are constant complaints about  the Province downloading responsibilities to the municipal governments,  "We don't need to help them by doing it ourselves."
 
Councilor Garth Frizzell says he applauds Councillor Munoz for trying to make a difference, but doesn't believe this is the way to go.
 
The Mayor says  there needs to be more respect in the way  such matters  are handled " We need to engage our staff  much earlier in the process."   He says  he was surprised to see  the  matter on the agenda, "It wasn't clear in my mind what would be the outcome if we were supportive of this?  There was such uncertainty in what would be the outcome, how could I in all good conscience allow this to get to the floor?"  
 
 
 
 
 

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Councillor Garth Frizzell:"Everyone wants clean air, we have a bowl that won't flush...but..."

HAHAHAHA OHHEEEHEEHEE HAHAHAHAHA

Made my night! That has to be the best darned quote IN AGES!!!

Thanks :)
clean air and fine particulate eh, what about the city bylaws for parking lot sweeping. i see acme sweeping away for hours the past 4 days in a huge cloud of dust and yet the city wont do nothing about it. and its not just acme, i've watched giscome cont. on a few site just giving her all he can to dust out our neighborhood!
where is the enforment of the "Clean Air Bylaw129) requires anyone sweeping roads or parking lots to use appropriate dust suppressing liquids.
I see a few companies using them but yet i have not seen acme, giscome and rockcreek or something like that but yet this particular company is owned by a city worker but dont follow our bylaws. (yes i know this because they showed up to my business and offered to do my lot while driving a city of prince george truck) favortism or payoffs?
I guess Munoz is the only one willing to at least try to do something about the PG airshed. The balance of the councillors are happy with the status quo and pay lip service to improving the air quality of PG.
"There was such uncertainty in what would be the outcome, how could I in all good conscience allow this to get to the floor?"

Hmmmmm ......

So Council meetings are rehearsed performances?
So Council meetings are rehearsed performances?

Mr Bates is the main actor and council just cheers him on.
Cheers