Clear Full Forecast

HST Bill Underway

By 250 News

Tuesday, March 30, 2010 02:38 PM

 
Victoria - The introduction of the Consumption Tax Rebate and Transition
Act proposes to eliminate the Provincial Sales Tax (PST) and the Hotel
Room Tax, streamlining the regulatory burden on business and supporting
the transition to the HST, announced Finance Minister Colin Hansen today.
 
"Our current provincial sales tax is a substantial and complex statute
that costs B.C. businesses millions of dollars a year in administration
and compliance," said Hansen. "By reforming our tax system and introducing
the HST, businesses will be more competitive and our province will see an
increase in investment, productivity and economic growth."
 
Fulfilling the Province's commitment under the Comprehensive Integrated
Tax Coordination Agreement with the federal government to wind down PST by
July 1, 2010, the new Consumption Tax Rebate and Transition Act eliminates
the seven-per cent PST and introduces HST-related measures designed to
mitigate the impacts of the HST on British Columbians.
 
Mitigation measures include:
 
* A B.C. HST credit to help low- and modest-income families.
* A point-of-sale rebate for the seven-per cent provincial portion of the
HST on motor fuels, books, children's-sized clothing and footwear,
children's car seats and booster seats, children's diapers and feminine
hygiene products.
* A provincially administered rebate and credit for the provincial portion
of HST payable on energy purchased for residential use.
 
Consistent with the tax treatment of the private sale of vehicles, boats
and aircraft in other HST provinces, the act includes the continuance of
the tax, but at a rate of 12 per cent. The act also includes amendments to
repeal the Innovative Clean Energy (ICE) Fund Levy on residential and
commercial energy, the $5 battery levy, the passenger vehicle rental tax,
the surtax on motor vehicles and multijurisdictional vehicle tax.
 
The act also eliminates the provincial portion of the hotel room tax, but
continues the two per cent additional hotel room tax levied on behalf of
local governments, regional districts and destination marketing
organizations to raise revenue for local tourism marketing.
 
To illustrate the importance of the high and growing cost of health care
for British Columbians, the act includes a requirement to annually table a
health-care funding plan and report to show health-care expenditures and
revenues from the HST, tobacco taxes, Medical Service Plan (MSP) premiums,
federal health-care transfers and lottery revenues from the Health Special
Account.
 
Consumption Tax Rebate and Transition Act - Supporting the Transition to
HST
 
The amendments:
 
* Eliminate the PST and various levies, such as the ICE levy on
residential and commercial energy.
* Provide transitional provisions to coordinate the elimination of the PST
with the implementation of the HST.
* Eliminate the provincial portion of the hotel room tax and provide
transitional provisions to co-ordinate the elimination of the provincial
tax with the implementation of the HST. The amendments will not affect the
additional hotel room tax levied on behalf of local governments, regional
districts and destination marketing organizations to raise revenue for
local tourism marketing.
* Introduce a provincial credit for the provincial portion of the HST
payable on residential energy.
* Establish point-of-sale rebates for the provincial portion of the HST
payable on motor fuels and certain other items.
* Continue the provincial tax on private sales of vehicles, boats and
aircraft, but at a rate of 12 per cent.
* Introduce a refundable B.C. HST Credit of $230 per person targeted to
low- and modest-income individuals and families. The new credit will be
provided together with the GST and climate action credits effective July
1, 2010.

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Never mind the spin, just tell us what is going to be taxed that isn't now so I can figure if my pension will allow a meal out now and then. Or if I will have to go an extra month or two before a haircut. Thanks for thinking of me Gordo. By the way, how much is gasoline going up on July 1st to acommadate the new gas tax, (carbon tax)?.
Once the GST is effectively buried, there is no hope of eliminating it, is there?

Don't think for one second that somehow this is better for us and not better for government. They will be receiving more taxes, not less. And we will be paying more taxes, not less. I don't care how they spin it. It's less money in my pocket to spend as I see fit. I have a major problem with that.

Notice how the governments are blowing their budgets in March, knowing that there is a freeze on them in the coming year. Disgusting, irresponsible behavior and it's allowed to continue. Spend it or you lose it attitude. Government is still out of control and it continually keeps expanding with every new program, every new tax, every new regulation. Convince me I am wrong.
So we who wish to buy a vehicle privately instead of from a dealer will have to pay more tax? VOTE NO!
Chester - convince me you are right. Can you show some proof of people blowing thier budget so they dont lose it? Im not arguaing with you, I just think the Federation of taxpayers might be interested in proof of a department buying items they dont need just so they dont lose thier budget.
Arogant SOB's
That's known to be a common practice not only in government but also in large corporations which set budgets for various divisions, or departments, interceptor.

The division or department managers are generally quite careful by how much they come in under budget. They want to show a surplus as a sign of their good management, but they're also conscious that too much of a surplus will result in head office's greater expectations of them in the next budget than they may be able to deliver.

The whole process of a government depending solely on a Budget is patently riduculous.

A Balanced Budget nationally, or provincially, if the figures within it are to have any real meaning, is another way of saying that everything that has been 'produced' in the relevant fiscal period has totally been 'consumed' in the SAME fiscal period. This is never the case.

Much of a government budget goes to produce things, infrastructure, public works, etc., which are not 'consumed' in the same time period in which they've been 'produced'. They last for years, and should be 'depreciated' over their anticipated life-span, same as they would be in any business. No business recovers all its CAPITAL COSTS in the same year they've been incurred in. They might like to, but the price of their products would have to be so high no one could ever afford to buy them.

A proper set of Government accounts, along the same lines as the books kept by any limited company, would show there is an annual increase in ASSETS that normally EXCEEDS, by quite a considerable amount, the annual increase in LIABILITIES.

The excess amount is an accretion to CAPITAL, from which in a limited company 'dividends' can be periodically paid. If the Government kept its books the same way, and was anywhere near as efficient as the fiscally prudent 'managers' they make out to be, we'd all be getting money back from them rather than annual tax increases.