Clear Full Forecast

Province Gets Tough On Drunk Driving

By 250 News

Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:13 AM


Victoria  - The Province is introducing Canada's most immediate and severe impaired driving penalties to save lives, curb repeat offenders and give police more enforcement tools, Solicitor General Michael de Jong, QC, announced today.

"Despite increased enforcement and significant efforts to promote awareness, we've begun to see a rise in impaired driving across British Columbia," said de Jong. "That trend is unacceptable and that's why we're bringing in these new
laws: to get impaired drivers off the road with clear, swift and severe penalties."

In memory of Alexa Middelaer, de Jong also announced a provincial goal: to reduce alcohol-impaired driving fatalities by 35 per cent by the end of 2013. Middelaer was four when she was killed by an alleged drunk driver in Delta two
years ago.

Under changes to the Motor Vehicle Act (MVA), drivers who provide a failing breath sample above 0.08 per cent BAC or refuse to provide a breath sample at the roadside will face an immediate, 90-day driving ban and a $500 fine. As
well, they will have their vehicle impounded for 30 days. They may also face criminal charges.

Drivers caught once in the "warn" range (between 0.05 and 0.08 per cent BAC) in a five-year period will face an immediate, three-day driving ban and a $200 fine; a second time, a seven-day ban and a $300 fine; and a third, a 30-day ban
and a $400 fine. Research shows that driving with a BAC in that range means a driver is seven times more likely to be in a fatal crash than if they have no alcohol in their body.

In addition, drivers who blow once in the "fail" range, or three times within five years in the "warn" range, will be required to participate in the rehabilitative Responsible Driver Program. They must also use an ignition
interlock device, which tests a driver's breath for alcohol every time they operate their vehicle, for one year.

"B.C.'s measures target impaired drivers more effectively than any Canadian jurisdiction has to date," said Andrew Murie, CEO of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Canada. "We believe these major, escalating penalties will better
support both deterrence and enforcement, save lives and prevent hundreds of injuries each year on B.C.'s roads. We encourage other provinces to study what B.C. is doing and follow its example."

The new, roadside-issued, 90-day bans mean officers will no longer need to take drivers to the station for a full breath analysis in order to impose a driving ban longer than 24 hours.

"We believe that this new initiative will help all law enforcement officers to apprehend and reduce the number of impaired drivers in our province," said Insp. Mike Diack of the RCMP's B.C. Traffic Services. "There are people killed
on B.C. highways each year as a direct result of impaired drivers. With additional enforcement powers, our police officers will be better equipped to reduce those casualties. Harm reduction is our number-one priority."

The changes to B.C.'s impaired driving laws are expected to come into effect in fall 2010.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

So, what this means is if you go to your neighborhood pub and have two pints of beer, depending on your physiology, you may very well be impaired within the meaning of the new regulations.
Gotta hand it to the law makers, they're making it more difficult for people to kill others with their vehicles.
You may be feeling completely sober or have that false bravado that booze brings on but the thing to ask yourself is "How much do I value my privelege to drive?"
If this saves one childs life, its worth it, don't you think?
DRIVE BY ANY PUB IN PRINCE GEORGE ANY NITE OF THE WEEK AROUND 8:PM AND NOTICE HOW FULL THE PARKING LOT IS. NOW DRIVE BY AT CLOSING TIME...EMPTY?! I GUESS EVERYONE JUSTIFIES DRIVING HOME WITH VARIOUS EXCUSES...EXCUSES CANNOT HEAL THE PAIN.
ON THE OTHER HAND DOES ANYONE KNOW HOW MUCH TAX THE GOVT GETS FROM LIQOUR SALES IN BC PER YEAR...WHERE WILL THEY GET THE MONEY TO PAY THE POLICE IF WE ALL QUIT DRINKING???
TOFC: Right on. And the pain never goes away when you've lost someone.
Think about it people. If you have to go drinking, for gods sake take a cab, it's cheaper than the consequences and nobody suffers.
TOFC, first of all, why are you yelling? Secondly, not everyone who drinks gets into a car and drives afterward.
good start...
long ways to go...
I like Turkey and South America's solution for impaired driving...
they get shot.....
I'm not yelling but somebody should.I know people affected by drunk driving and they all need a voice that rises above...If they didn't drive then where did the vehicles go, dont kid yourself, its worse than most people realise.Having said that, my hats off to all those who do the right thing.
So, it's basically a conviction without the right to a trial, right? Blow a .05 into a roadside screening device and you've got a suspension, fine, and a smear on your driving record. You won't be able to challenge its accuracy, refute the test methodology or call into question the RCMP member's ability or qualifications to properly administer the test. Lots of inept RCMP members out there, and it's their word against, wait, nothing!

(And yes, I know this falls under the "driving is a privilege" catch-all. I'm not defending impaired drivers, it just bothers me that "guilty until proven innocent" exists within our system).

Funny how these laws get tougher every time a Liberal MLA (or premier) gets busted for driving drunk.

squirrel: "Funny how these laws get tougher every time a Liberal MLA (or premier) gets busted for driving drunk."

Would you prefer that the laws got weaker? What would the interpretation of that be?
What I meant was that it seems like deflection rather than doing the right thing because it's the right thing to do. "Ignore the fact that another MLA got busted, look at how tough we are on drinking drivers".

But hey, that's just me being a cynic.
Might as well close all the pubs then!

Get a cab you say, What!after one beer I need to phone a taxi!

Its nothing to do with drunk driving, just more money for this drunk Government!

Notice its the toughest drinking law in Canada right now, BC Government is broke there trying to get money from everywhere

gotta read between the lines people!
I am applauding that the rules just got tougher. It doesn't matter to me the reason behind it; all that matters is that they are getting tougher. I am sure it is fresh in most peoples minds the death of an innocent Prince George man, who was plowed over by a drunk woman who decided she was sober enough to drive home. This poor man was killed in the prime of his life. TOFC you are so right about the parking lots of the pubs being empty at the end of the night and yes, obviously decisions were made to drive home. I am so behind any rule that will make it harder for a drunk to get behind the wheel.
I am applauding that the rules just got tougher. It doesn't matter to me the reason behind it; all that matters is that they are getting tougher. I am sure it is fresh in most peoples minds the death of an innocent Prince George man, who was plowed over by a drunk woman who decided she was sober enough to drive home. This poor man was killed in the prime of his life. TOFC you are so right about the parking lots of the pubs being empty at the end of the night and yes, obviously decisions were made to drive home. I am so behind any rule that will make it harder for a drunk to get behind the wheel.
the whole idea of neighborhood pubs was that you could walk there and stagger home..still trying to figure out why they need parking lots then.
Well apparently, I am so passionate about this topic, that I posted it twice. Sorry about that, but yes I am very passionate about this topic.
This is a good step...but need to impress on the courts (judges) that they have had the sentence latitude for about 10 years to put incorrigable drunk drivers (those who dont give a damn that they lost their driving privileges)who just get drunk and drive anyway in jail for a serious amount of time. Problem is, that the judges dont yet consider the seriousness of drunk driving (which I dont understand). The serious penalties are there for serious drunk driver offenders.....LET'S USE THEM JUDGES!!!!
Right on "gimmeabreak". That's why I am so pleased to see this law, because it really is a gong show once it hits the courts. So if they can make the laws tougher, maybe the charges will stick once it gets into the courts. Even if all that happens, is they get their vehicle impounded for 30 days; thats 30 days that they aren't out there on the streets.
put a helmet on them.
So now we have a $200 dollar fine for 0.05 to 0.08.
Now there is a great cash cow for the government!
They should do really well on a weekend!
I have no issue with this. Heck, I'd have no problem with zero tolerance. Of course, along with stuff like this you also need penalties that are severe enough to deter people. How about mandatory jail time of a couple of days for a roadside suspension? Maybe weekend garbage duty while wearing a bright pink costume? Might as well get something useful from the losers who insist on drinking and driving. Kill someone while doing it? Lock them in with the other criminals who kill people.
So I can't have a wine when I go out to dinner, or I will be liable,unreal!

Will this put a stop to the chronic drinker! I think not.
I sure hope this new law applies to cops and politians.

Cash cow Cash cow Cash cow Cash cow Cash cow Cash cow
So in the law, a judge can sentence a drunk driver who kills, to life in prison, where there are aggravating factors (i.e. someone who has multi DWI offences and is once again driving drunk while licence is suspended). So what is the longest sentence given out since this penalty was available to judges.....wait for it...

12 FLIPPIN YEARS....go figger????

AND IT GETS WORSE...most sentences for killing someone while drunk driving are still in the 0-4 year range. Life is sure cheap to most judges.
I am also wondering who will be checking the cops?
Or the politicians?
Considering we have a Premier who's first order of business in his new job was to get himself busted in Hawaii for drunk driving,this does lose something.
And it wasn't for 0.05 either!
I know that in many European countries, the acceptable limit is .02, so no one drives even after one drink. I also know that anyone in the vehicle, except the driver, can have an open container. A DD over there is a good friend indeed.

And the pot dealers are laughing all the way to the bank!
You are so right "gimmeabreak", 0 - 4 years is all a life is worth these days. Pretty dam sad. And the worst part of it, is that many times prior offences can't be brought up in a court case. Imagine that.