Clear Full Forecast

Report from Parliament's Hill - May 7th, 2010

By Prince George - Peace River M.P. Jay Hill

Friday, May 07, 2010 03:44 AM

“Conservative Government Continues to Push Justice Reforms”

As many constituents may recall, I have been fighting to end “House Arrest” for violent offenders since the former Liberal Government introduced the legal loophole in 1995.

In fact, it was 11 years ago this month that I introduced for the first time a Private Member’s Bill to address the frequent misuse of conditional sentencing by proposing to restrict the use of Section 742.1 of the Criminal Code so that violent criminals could not serve their sentences in the comfort of their homes.

I continued to re-introduce this legislation in subsequent Parliaments until our Conservative Government, when we took power in 2006, introduced legislation to restrict conditional sentencing.  However, the opposition parties gutted that Bill as it wound through the Parliamentary process so that many violent offenders, including those convicted of aggravated assault, human trafficking, luring a child and arson, among other offences, remain eligible for conditional sentencing.

Now, our Government has re-introduced legislation to end the use of house arrest for these crimes. If passed, Bill C-16 would give clear instructions to the courts that those who commit serious violent and property offences will go to jail!

And in our ongoing efforts to utilize the time and resources available in both Houses of Parliament, our Government has also introduced legislation in the Senate to ensure “serious time for the most serious crime”.  Bill S-6 would repeal the ‘faint-hope clause’ that allows murderers to obtain early parole.

This Bill would ensure that criminals who commit first-degree murder would not be eligible for parole until they serve the full 25 years of their sentence.  Similarly, second-degree murder convicts serving life sentences wouldn’t get parole until their parole eligibility period is served.

Not only will this legislation keep killers off our streets longer and make them fully serve their punishment, the families of murder victims will no longer have to suffer the anguish of attending repeated early parole eligibility hearings.

In another step to protect Canadians, their property and their communities, our Government has also introduced in the Senate our proposals to tackle auto theft and property crime.

Auto theft is highly lucrative for organized crime and costs Canadians approximately $1-Billion each year.  Bill S-9 proposes to give law enforcement and the courts better tools to tackle auto theft, as well as the trafficking of all types of stolen or fraudulently obtained property.

And most recently this week, our Government introduced legislation to crack down on organized drug crime.  Bill S-10 proposes mandatory jail time for drug trafficking carried out for organized crime purposes or when a weapon or violence is involved.  Prison time will also be mandatory if drugs are sold to youth or the trafficking takes place near a school or an area normally frequented by youth (a measure contained in another Private Members’ Bill I repeatedly introduced in Parliaments past).

We have also introduced legislation to strengthen the sex offender registry and to strengthen measures against online child predators.

For more information on our Conservative Government’s justice reform agenda and all of our legislation, go to www.parl.gc.ca.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Bill S-10 is as backwards as we can possibly get. Mandatory minimums will do absolutely nothing to curtail drug use and only place more power in the hands of organized criminals. Emulating the utter failure that is the U.S. style war on drugs is beyond ludicrous. This bill will do nothing to make Canada a better or safer place for anyone.

9 months in prison for growing as little as 6 marijuana plants is absurd by any measure. 25000 people smoked marijuana at Ontario's legislature last week, nobody blinked an eye. Thousands more did the same at the nations capitol and other houses of governance across the land. If it were such an evil, they should all be in jail.

To pretend there is such a vast disconnect between those who grow and those who use marijuana is incredibly naive and ignorant in the extreme. Marijuana is one of the easiest plants on the planet to grow, anyone with a little sunshine and dirt or a closet and a light bulb can do it. Marc Emery sold millions of seeds across this country over the years, do you really want us to believe that the Hell's Angels were the only ones buying them? Push this bill through and it will be.

When there is no victim, there is no crime. Stop jailing people for violating nothing more than your sense of morality.
One piece of legislation is missing. That is a bill to delay collecting the hst until after any referendum. It is what the voters want in BC, obviously, so why do the Conservatives not carry out the wishes of the people?
At the present time a referendum is not a sure thing. First it has to be seen if the sign-up campaign succeeds in ALL the ridings. Ottawa is not going to pass legislation for something that may never happen.

Let's wait and see.
Well said Meltedtime. Bill C-10 does nothing to protect society and everything to victimize it. By criminalizing small gardens they enable the opportunist criminals and create an underground market that enables further criminal organization. The laws would be so much more effective if they differentiated between hard drugs (drugs that enable violence), over the counter drugs (pharmaceutical abuse), and the garden variety (weed, tobacco, alcohol). Each requires its own strategy... a broad brush just enlarges the criminal enterprise.
I think the conservatives are clear on their position for the middle class HST tax hike. I think it does great damage to their integrity come election time, and that they will be identified as the prime actors in this unprecedented tax transfer from corporations to individuals.
If our Conservative government keeps squandering the legacy of the Liberals (seven consecutive years of surplus) we may end up with an HST of 23% instead of 12%. That's what they have in Greece where it is called VAT. Canada should not pile on new debts every year. It is reminiscent of the Mulroney spend, spend, spend years.

Jay Hill does not represent us. He comes to us and tells us what his Fearless Leader dictates for our fate. It would be nice to have an MP who comes to us to see what WE want in legislation.

As crime rates fall, Harper wants to build new prisons and hire guards as he cuts social programmes that benefit citizens on the streets.

Where are we headed here? More people in prisons, more fear generated as we are suspicious of one another. When people live in fear they tend to appeal to Big Brother for protection.

I fear for our collective future.

I'm SummerSoul and this is just SummerSoul's opinion.
The Liberals "seven consecutive years of surplus" simply downloaded the debt of the Federal government onto the Provinces, who in turn downloaded much of it onto Municipalities, and eventually it was all downloaded onto US.

What was reduced in debt held 'collectively' through the National Debt was increased in that borne 'individually' through a rise in corporate and personal debt.

The OVERALL rate of indebtedness GREW in Canada throughout all the years of the Chretien/Martin regimes, just as it has grown under Harper. And HSTs or VATs, no matter what level they're at, will only make the situation worse, not better.

Under the current system, a 'Balanced Budget' of governments can only come at the expense of unbalancing everyone else's budget. Harper can be criticised for many failings, but one positive thing he has done was to lower the GST from 7% to 5%, and also cut some other taxes. It would be extremely fooolish to reverse any of those moves now.

What would make much more sense, though I don't expect to see it from ANY of the current mainstream Parties, would be to implement a proper accounting system for the nation as a whole. One similar in nature to that used in every private business, where we the "shareholders", can see the growth of our ASSETS, (and "our" stake in them ~ our CAPITAL), instead of just the LIABILITIES, in the form of an increased National Debt. In all likelihood, we should be getting 'dividends' FROM the government, rather than continually paying more and more in taxes TO the government.