Clear Full Forecast

Roadside Breathalyzers Being Recalibrated

By Michelle Cyr-Whiting

Friday, November 19, 2010 03:42 PM

Prince George, B.C. -  One-half of the roadside breathalyzers in use in Prince George have already been sent away to be re-calibrated in light of today's announcement by the B.C. Association of  Chiefs of Police that the warn level will be changed to eliminate the 'error factor' in readings.

The association has announced the Approved Screening Devices are being re-set to give a warning reading for a blood alcohol level of 0.06, instead of 0.05.  Although that 0.05 is still the limit set in legislation for a warn, Sergeant Pat McTiernan with Fraser-Fort George Traffic Services, says re-calibrating the devices to give a warn at 60 milligrams-percent will remove the argument that a person may actually be below the warn limit due to a faulty reading.

He says, "We've realized that every instrument -- whether it's radar or breathalyzer instruments or roadside screening devices -- they all have an error factor, so if we set the calibration of the roadside screening device at 50 milligrams-percent, there may be a couple of milligrams-percent there and someone may be able to say, 'You know, there was a possibility I was actually a little bit under.'"

McTiernan says the re-calibration will put police on a firmer footing, "Absolutely, at the end of the day, we were teetering with an error factor on the bounds of the legislation."   The sergeant says while that level has always been there, given the severity of the new sanctions -- which include three-, seven- and 30-day licence suspensions and vehicle impoundment -- the police want to instill public confidence.

"This will reinforce the fact that we're satisfied that we're not having to worry about error factors and the public can be satisfied that we've gone above and beyond what it takes to ensure that they're definitely over 50 milligrams-percent."

McTiernan says the manufacturer is changing a sensor in the screening devices for a minimal cost.  He says the first batch will be back to Prince George by next Wednesday.  The RCMP is staggering the send out because the devices can still be used for a fail.  And McTiernan emphasizes officers will still be issuing 24-hour driving prohibitions using the methods they`ve always used -- they just won`t be enacting the impound component while the devices are being re-calibrated.  He expects all devices in the province will be re-set in two to three weeks.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Zero tolerance would be much easier. Done successfully in many countries - who still manage to have successful restaurant and bar industries.

Not often one feels sympathy for the RCMP these days, but Coleman has really done a number on them with this one.

Finally give them a tool with teeth, instead of tons of paperwork so a judge can let the drunk walk, and then Coleman start backing away from it, telling police "they don't have to impound the vehicle".

Now when then enforce the law they look lik a-holes for doing it.

I don't know why people have such a hard time planning ahead when going out for an evening. Arrange a ride beforehand, one in the group stay sober, take a cab..... it isn't rocket science but most people act like their rights have been trampled on by new drinking driving laws.
DUH!!!???

Why do they not just show the actual reading? As has been reported on several occasions, the test is actually not a test of the blood alcohol, but of an indicator level in someone's breath which can be affected in several other ways.

Anyone recall the formaldehyde likely false positive reading? That is scientific instrumentation error and operating technician error. At a much finer detail, the frequency of such errors increase.

This whole mess is actually a human error happening right in front of us.

It would be interesting to see one of these cases go through court to see whether a judge may just dismiss a "warning" reading since it shows nothing of substance relative to alcohol content of blood.

Why do radar speed detectors not just show "warning" or some other word of the day?

These are not toys. These are intruments which should tell the whole story that they can tell. "Warning" dumbs the whole system down to where a judge will no longer be able to make a rational decision on a case by case situation.
I hope they mailed them with insufficient postage on some of them.
Like everything else they do this is a Liberal screw up. They should have left well enough alone.

As far as Im concerned .08 was sufficient. The problem is that they do not want to enforce the laws on the books because they will fill their jails. Much better to fine the driver, and impound the cars. This allows them to make some money while enforcing the law. I use the term *law* loosely.

They have always had stiff penalties for impaired driving or driving with a blood alcohol reading in excess of .08

1. Impaired driving
2. Dangerous driving
3. Driving without due care and attention.
4. Criminal Negligence
5. Second offence for impaired driving automatic 14 days in jail.

This whole mess reflects the amount of time and thought that the Liberals put into legislation. Same problem with the tax reduction, hst, carbon tax, gambling, etc etc;

These guys need to go, sooner rather than later.
Nice to let let everybody know they are gone for awhile.
Now the alcoholics can go back driving drunk for a short time.
i gotta figure a new name for my province ..man this is getting really hilerious first the taxes the hst this thing ,then he leaves maybee campbell will come back ? wow.... who knows whats next !
Jale4: Of all the people I know who have received an impaired charge, not one of them has 'walked' except for a lawyers son. I have been driving since 1958 and I have seen many people charged so I really don't understand your statement about drunks 'walking'. I know a lot of people who drove while suspended as well and when they were caught, the judge was never lenient. I am against drunk driving; I'm also against murder and have seen more murderers 'walk' than I have drunks.
I wish my experience was the same as yours Supertech - and "walked" was an unfortunate choice of words - most don't even lose their licenses.

If you can afford a good lawyer you can beat nearly every DD charge. And if you can tie your livelyhood (and a hungry family) to the ability to drive, judges will give you a kiss goodbye with your keys.
Campbell walked after a drunk driving charge. Did he ever do any time; did he even lose his license. Live and learn by example.
Would be nice if my stupid neighbour would drink and drive and then be thrown in jail.
hammmy - Campbell was caught in another country and faced the laws of that country, let it go.
My problem with the new law is making the officer judge jury and executioner. Its still Canada and we still deserve our day in court do we not? If you are guilty then you get the punishment - but unreliable technology on the side of the road with the punishment dished out by a human (meaning mood, perception, et al) is not what anybody wants. I know drinking and driving is a popular band wagon, thats the only reason that the general public is not screaming about this abuse of rights.