Clear Full Forecast

Council Paved This Path: One Man's Opinion

By Ben Meisner

Tuesday, July 25, 2006 03:59 AM

    
In 1974, the people along the North Nechako appeared before the Prince George City Council of the day to complain about the pollution, the noise and the smell of the asphalt plant across the river from their homes.

That was 32 years ago.

The company in question was operating on a two year permit, that mining plant was to cease operations. They received an extension from the City Council and the plant was granted further years without ever considering the problems.

In Prince George, you cannot idle your vehicle on city streets, put on a fire for a marshmallow roast in your backyard, and in the winter there are concerns if you burn wood for warmth. 

Yet, industry has been allowed to produce asphalt on the Ottway bench for the past 32 years.

Listening to the City Council debate the issue last night  sounded exactly like the same song that was delivered to the residents in 1974, 1979, 1983, 1987 and so on.

There even was a study undertaken by residents along the Bench which pointed out that in most other centers in Western Canada, asphalt plants are located a number of miles away frompopulated areas.  But the City Council of the day extended the permit to produce asphalt.

Now let’s use some basic common sense.  The dust flows along the river into the city because any grade two student will tell you heat rises and the dust will follow the river into the bowl.

Noise travels over water, enough there.

Finally, take a look at who supported the extension of the permits.  You will be surprised. 

To suggest that when a new player came to the city asking for a permit to mine gravel on Ottway that the flag didn’t go up is just nonsense.

So let’s wait and see what’s in the works this time, and please don’t hold your breath.   Many have already been waiting 32 years.

I’m Meisner and that is one man’s opinion.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

COUGH !
It's time for some change. Do the citizens of this city not have enough influence to have an impact on our city council? If not, who does? Someone does.

If these folks will not listen and make some changes to improve the living conditions for those who live hear, then it's time to change the guard.

Isn't it time to elect a new team of leaders? Let's face it, if we continue with the same old faces, same old decisions and their same old supporters, nothing is going to change. Chester
I second Chester.
Has anyone listened to the news (day before yesterday) about the mayor and a couple of city councilors in Hamilton, Ontario?

CBC had a story about a former Hamilton city councilor following up on illegal campaign contributions, and boy, did she ever hit paydirt!

She took her evidence to the Council but of course it refused to launch an investigation that would have meant investigating itself.

Not only that, but she was stonewalled all the way by the City Council and even the province. She ended up hiring a lawyer and spending 30 grand of her own money, refusing to give up her investigation.

Result: over $ 29,000 bucks had to be returned to the contributors and the whole matter is now in the hands of the law.

Apparently the big thing is "rezoning" and the big bucks that developers stand to make when they can get low value land rezoned for high value development.

This is a tempting matter in virtually all cities right across Canada, according to the commentary of the CBC story.

It showed how much of a difference the dogged determination of a "little ol' lady" can make to uncover potentially unethical conduct at any goverment levels.



Wasn't it our last civic election where Sherry Sethen was supported by a big developer in this city as her campaign chair, who himself was ingaged in smear campaigns through stealth to disrupt and discredit any opposition to their development plans....

Obviously PG is a prime example of elites who hand pick city council through funding campaings of candidates that create zoning oportunities (Wal-mart, casino ect) for their small circle at the expense of the community as a whole. I am shocked that the law has not yet cought up with them.

It is of great concern for me that our democracy is not protected by our law enforcement and judiciary. Worse yet that people seem to feel their is nothing they can do to strengthen our democracy.
Hey Chester: I'll nominate ya to run fer city council next time. Then you can show 'em how to run a "gritty little mill town" properly. How about it?
Chadermando

Your comments are the biggest pile of B.S. I have ever read.

A bit of fact and a whole lot of fiction.

Diplomat,

I heard the story on CBC myself.....it was a great news story, and i liked how the reporter let her talk for so long, did not just give her 60 seconds of airtime and cut her off.

That lady ROCKS in my opinion !!!

Maybe we here in PG could start a pool, and gather some funds to hire a lawyer and auditor and have them take a look at the funding of the council....it sure seemed weird to me that kinsley beat out rogers.
and i think the way kinsley blows tax bucks on his fancy trips to places needs looking at as well.
He went to some darn place ( i forget what country) to look at snow removal, yet here in PG we get more snow than most places so are used to it already.
The olympic watching trip for him and his pals really pissed me off.
And on and on it goes...............

I will personally donate $1,000 to a legal fund if people want to do this.
I agree Diplomat,
I can say I didn't vote for the @%$^%&%...you pick your choice of words.
I even sent him an email telling him I wasn't going to vote for him.
I beleive he is milking this city for all he can "legally","????" get.
I notice that the city council memebers seem to conveniently be away when a vote comes up that they either really want or really don't want, but don't want to come right out and say do.
They must think us stupid???
The decisions to rezone is sometimes a complex task, trying to boost economic activity while at the same time respecting concern for the environment, noice and air pollution,etc.

Nevertheless, these issues need to be discussed and weighed by city council. This is what we pay them for. When they don't address the issues at hand, it always leads us to suspect conflict of interest taking place. Who's paying who off or who is getting a kick-back (Mulroney bucks)?

Our city councillors are quiet on rezoning issues, our MP's are quiet on the softwood lumber agreement. It makes us wonder what is going on. There has to be much more transparency to government and the decisions they make for us. However, it seems that, like others say, there is a "cone of silence" surrounding our political lives.

People like David Emerson, suspect in many conflict of interest issues, former CEO of Canfor, turncoat Liberal, Phd in economics, doesn't instill any confidence in my belief that deomocracy is working. He is a carpet bagger of a large group of leaders and influencials that are leading us down the garden path. Gordon Campbell is another who appears like a misguided youth hanging out with the rich crowd who doesn't give a damned about society, assuming he even understands the concept.

Economics, corporatism; we are left dealing with such complexity that nobody seems to understand. Our governments are held hostage to their machinations and we are the victims. I don't see how we can solve the problems if we don't get back to some basics. Perhaps we could start with knowing and believing that the most important person in a democratic society is the 'citizen', that government is the voice and arm of the people, that government is accountable to the people, and when the governments don't listen, we hold them accountable through elections, through the courts, through our opinions and voices.

We must prevail or else all is lost!