Clear Full Forecast

U.S. Says No To Older Beef, Bell Disappointed

By 250 News

Friday, July 28, 2006 10:59 AM

    

B.C.’s Minister of Agriculture, Pat Bell says he is very disappointed with the U.S. Agriculture Department’s decision to skuttle plans to resume imports of older cattle and beef from older animals.

The U.S. says its backing off because of recent discoveries of cows with BSE ( mad cow disease ) in Canada. There have been seven such cows discovered in Canada, four of the cases were discovered this year.

Pat Bell says this is all about protectionism, not about quality of the beef “Whether its softwood lumber, beef or grain, the United States has become more protectionist. They have to understand that kind of stance will hurt their economy long before it will hurt ours. We will look for other trading partners who are offering truly free and open markets.”

Bell says the decision will impact on two smaller sectors of the beef industry, namely the replacement heifer sector (animals raised in Canada for milking in the U.S.) and cull animals, which are older cows that would have been shipped to the States for hamburger.

Bell says the Ministry of Agriculture will continue to co-operate with the U.S. on testing to show we are committed to resolving the BSE issue. “The fact is, we have been increasing the number of animals being tested, while the Americans have been decreasing their testing, so that should tell you the Americans are not serious about solving the BSE problem.”

Bell says this decision has increased his resolve to develop increased trading with the Asian and European markets. “Either the Americans want to be our trading partner, or they don’t want to be our trading partner, and this decision demonstrates they do not want to be our trading partner.”


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

The Americans signed international agreements like NAFTA, which has an agreed-upon dispute mechanism.

Of course, if they do not have any intention to honour what they signed then one wonders if it is not all simply about blatant exploitation of trading partners who do not get any respect but the eternal run-around.

"...and this decision demonstrates they do not want to be our trading partner.”

So, what are you going to do about it?

They are going to do nothing diplomat,
absoluely nothing....ok...make a lot of noise....maybe
He said what he is going to do about it. "Bell says this decision has increased his resolve to develop increased trading with the Asian and European markets."

I agree. We need to diversify not only our local economy in PG, but we also have to diversify our trading partners locally as well as provincially and internationally.

I wish him luck selling our beef to other countreis though, since I believe many have stricter standards than either the USA or Canada and therein lies the rub when the USA is trying to sell its beef to other countries.

I do not know whether Canada imports any beef form the USA. If we do, we should probably be a bit stricter as well.
How about giving the beef fake I.D? Works at the local bars in town.
If someone doesn't want to be a trading partner there is little if anything one can do!

That is why I asked the rhetorical question:

"So, what are you going to do about it?"

Meaning: "Forget it!"

Good Luck Pat Bell in your efforts to find other more reliable trading partners! Mexico buys beef from Canada, so does Japan.

It shouldn't be too difficult to diversify!

China has a population of 1,300 million and they have to eat every day, so get them hooked on Alberta and B.C. beef burgers and steaks!

Half the world's population goes to bed hungry every night!

Cut the US market right off, like the Russians did a few years ago with US chicken imports which proved to be improperly inspected before shipment (salmonella).

"We will look for other trading partners who are offering truly free and open markets.”

Do it, by golly!




I do not for one minute believe anything Pat Bell has to say is given any serious consideration.
Much like a flea bothering an elephant!
He made a lot of waves over the Sofwood lumber issue, now didn't he?
Have the Americans apples hit our stores yet? They have a bumper crop, and they will be shipping to our stores.
Pat is really a big waste of time, as I do not know of one issue he has been successful at.
Does anybody?
I agree Trusted...
he is Campbells mouth piece...He says nothing unless Campbell says so...
At lest that is my opionion, others may disagree and you are entitled to that opinion
I for one am going to do my level best to purchase goods from anywhere but the USA unless I absolutely have to have the item and it is not available from another souce.
Actually I have for the last 3 years and have been quite sucessful actually and I have learned to substitute quite well.....
>I for one am going to do my level best to purchase goods from anywhere but the USA <

Consumers have a lot more power than they think:

Walmart-Germany just sold all its stores to a chain named Real (which is owned by Metro). The 11,000 employees hope that their jobs are safe now, but only time will tell.

Walmart-Germany was a bust, a money losing proposition from the start. I don't know if the Iraq war and AfGhanistan had anything to do with it, but Europeans (on the continent) "fell out of love" with America AT just about the same time the "shock and awe" was perpetrated.

I drive a Japanese vehicle (totally built in Japan) after decades of domestic ones, which usually started to fall apart after the warranty expired.

This one is trouble free (zero problems!) from day one.

Consumers have a lot more power than they think.

Bell disappointed? Big deal! And that's all he'll do about it....be disappointed. Thanks for the heads up Bell. I still think he had his bell rung one too many times by Campbell.
I think you need a clapper to ring a bell....