Clear Full Forecast

Coleman Optimistic on Softwood

By 250 News

Wednesday, August 02, 2006 03:58 AM

There may be a  need for minor tweaks, but Minister of Forests and Range, Rich Coleman, thinks the softwood deal would be supported across the country.

He is aware  the industry is still  talking it over, but says  the lumber industry has to start  looking at the what "makes" the deal, he says it's time to focus "Quite coming up with something every week  that you think you would like to add into this thing, focus on the real fundamentals of the trade deal" says the Minister.

He says a lot of things the industry expresses concerns over, can be managed within our country and don't really belong  in the trade deal.

Coleman says comments by Trade Minister David Emerson  that the softwood deal may not go to Parliament were unfortunate.  "I think that  may have been a statement out of frustration in front of a committee 'cause the reality is, it is very close to fundamentally being the deal we want."

Coleman  says  there were four main issues B.C. wanted covered, but he beleives two  can be managed  internally.  The remaining concerns are:  logs from private lands at the Coast.  That's an issue Coleman says has created a  rift in the  U.S. Lumber Coalition because producers in the Southeast don't want to discuss it while their partners in Washington and Oregon States want it dealt with.  The final point is  a "standstill" at the end of the agreement  which Coleman says is very important. He says at the end of 7 years,  he would like to see a standstill "Where nobody does any litigation and nobody puts any  anti-dumping duties in place, so you have free trade for a year.  That will develop the fundamentals of pricing so you can negotiate the next deal."

Coleman  still thinks  the deal is the best we will see "I've been in this thing since the beginning,and I look at the history  of softwood in Canada and fundamentally, this is the best deal this country has ever seen."


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Coleman is a hard worker.
Coleman is another of Cambells puppets.
My opinion.
So of course he is going to parrot what Mr Campbell has been saying and he is going a wonderful job of it too.
Coleman now tells us the deal is OK. Thats not what Campbell told us a while back. He told us that BC would nor accept the deal.

Coleman is probably just flying a kite to soften the nay sayers. He might just as well as it looks like a done deal as Harper will have the last word.
I just wish the B.C. Government would make uo its mind. One day they oppose the next day they support. Which is it? I guess that it is a difficult deal. Then again it might take the government time to figure out who they actually support. Do they represent the people? (Losing over one billion dollars in our revenue is not acceptable). Do they support industry? (Deal is good for big producers but not for smaller guys). Do they support Ottawa's Shrub? (who seems to bend over every time the Americans approach him). What or whom should they support? If history has taught us nothing else it reveals the current B.C. Governments support for big business above all else. Guess which way their final support will be thrown and win a quewpie doll!!
The fact that the deal is still progressing is a miracle in itself. Even all of the negative comments and criticisms aren't having much effect on the outcome of this deal. I am thankful for all those who are responsible, who have continued working on this and haven't given up.

There are easier roads to travel when the heat is on. I would like to thank all those responsible for not quitting. Chester
I assume no taxes have been paid to the governments on these billions of dollars, and companies have written the tariff off as an expense?
So now the money comes rolling in!
Now the governments can tax it to the hilt.
I wonder if they are giving this any consideration.
Why would I even give that a thought?
What percentage will be the governments take?
Federally and provincially?
Is it possible it will amount to billions?
That issue surely has no bearing on both governments desire to settle?
Am I assuming? or is this a possibility?
Never assume anything....
Possibility...no doubt here...