Clear Full Forecast

Gaming Centre - BINGO!

By 250 News

Monday, September 11, 2006 11:28 PM

    

This is the block the City of Prince George has  approved  as the site for the new Gaming Centre.

The change of location for the Good Time Bingo Hall has been approved.  As long as the BC Lotteries Corporation gives the green light  the Good Time Bingo Hall will be allowed to move from  the current location at 4th and Victoria, to  the site you see above which will encompass the block from  6th to 7th Avenues along Quebec Street.  The City  has sold the site to Otter Properties for $1.209 million. 

The "Deal"

The deal has Otter Properties paying for the demolition of existing buildings and picking up half the tab ($70,000) for environmental remediation of the lot.  Otter Properties would also build an underground parkade, although the City would pick up the tab which has been revised to $3 million dollars.  The funding to come from  the off street parking reserve fund ($1.50 million) and the balance to come from the Downtown Development fund which will be topped up with proceeds from the  sale of Recreation Place.  City Manager George Paul says the sale of the Recreation Place lands has resulted in $2 million dollars being held in trust for the City. 

The Gaming Centre project is pegged to have a value of $12 to $15 million dollars, and  if construction started tomorrow it would take one year to  complete.  It calls for 26 thousand square feet for the gaming centre, 6 townhomes and 600 square feet of retail that will be designated for National Tilden car rentals.

Engineer David McWalter of L&M Engineering says the parking  lot would be constructed for the benefit of the City of Prince George, and will not be for the benefit of the gaming centre.  The Gaming centre will have 57 parking stalls on the street level.

McWalter says he thinks it will be a major catalyst for the regeneration of Downtown Prince George.

The building will carry a "Northern Wilderness" theme  which will showcase  Native and naturalist art.

Opposition

The approval didn’t come without lots of discussion. Opposing the move was the Community Planning Council.  Alex Michelos , the Chair of the Community Planning Council made the presentation:

  • no evidence to support the claim from the B.C. Lotteries Corporation that a Gaming Centre will revitalize Bingo. The Planning Council says the BC Lotteries Corp noted bingo was still healthy in Prince George so they question the need to "revitalize"
  • the location is inappropriate. The Planning Council says while Council may think the location is the "heart of the City’s Cultural Centre" The CPC doesn’t see  a gaming centre as a natural fit with an art gallery,  Public Library, Civic and Convention Centre.
  • Presence of Security Guards.  They worry the presence of security guards will send a negative image of the safety in the downtown core.
  • need for social impact assessments and a public consultation on the gaming facility policy

The Days Inn opposes the centre on two major counts,  first, there are worries their parking will be lost to gaming centre patrons especially when the Spruce Kings are playing.  There is also a concern about noise.  The Day’s Inn owner said "Imagine this; its 1:30 in the morning, and 600 people spill out from the gaming centre, 600 people are making noise, 600 people are starting their cars. I don’t think this will be acceptable to patrons who are trying to sleep."

Peter Thompson, the Managing Director of the Art Gallery says he realizes the facility could bring more people into the downtown, but parking is a major concern as there are already parking challenges in the area when there is a major event underway at the Civic Centre.  Still, he anticipates being a "good neighbour" to the development.

Another hotelier said while he wasn't speaking on behalf of his company he doesn't think the facility would have any benefit to downtown.  He suggested the project be moved to outside of town.

Investigation:

Once again Councilor Brian Skakun withdrew from the discussion.  As in the past when the gaming centre has been brought before Council,  Councillor Skakun reiterated that he believed he was offered an inappropriate campaign contribution which he perceived was linked to the gaming centre.  Steve Wilment took to the centre table and asked that Council not make any decision on gambling based on questions about election donation impropriety.  "I think it is deplorable that we are even thinking about it" he told Council. Mayor Kinsley said campaign contribution disclosure documents are available for viewing on the 5th floor, and he assured Mr. Wilment that no one on Council is under any kind of police investigation  concerning campaign contributions.

Gaming Details

The new gaming centre will offer 660 bingo gaming seats and 100 slot machines.  That will bring to 500 the number of slot machines in Prince George.  Owner John Major says they would like to start with 75 slot machines, but would like to have the flexibility to  expand to 100.

Here is how Prince George will compare with other cities where there are both casinos and gaming centres:

CITYCasino Slots Gaming Centre slotsTotal Slots
Prince George

 400 

100

500

Kamloops

 300 

50

350

Kelowna

342

75

417

Dollars turned over to Communities  through Gaming,  1st Quarter Fiscal Year 2006/2007

CITYCasino Share Gaming Centre ShareTotal
Prince George$633,447.50not yet active$633,447.50
Kamloops$476,644.60$50,281.76$526,926.42
Kelowna$672,179.77$141,395.18$813,574.95

In support of the facility, the presentations to Council included letters and presentations from various community groups and charities, all of whom stand to benefit financially from a successful  gaming centre.  The charities are guaranteed $50 thousand a year from the slot profits in addition to the share of the Bingo revenue.

Moving:

Otter Properties’  John Major says he has reached an agreement with the United Way and would be able to wait 6 months until United Way could find a new building before demolishing, although Major says the United Way has a line on some sites and might be able to move as early as the end of October.  Major also indicated Otter Properties would help with moving costs for the United Way and other charities in that facility.  He also told Council his company will cover some of the costs  for the Crisis Intervention centre so  the burden of re-establishing phone lines will be minimized.  Major made it clear that while his construction team would build the underground parkade,  if there are any cost overruns, he would cover those costs.

Security

On matters of security, Major says  panhandling has not been an issue, Goodtime Bingo has not allowed that kind of activity at the existing site and will continue with that.  In fact, Director of Operations at Treasure Cove Casino Steve Leach (former Prince George RCMP Detachment Superintendant) produced a report which said the RCMP Detachment in Prince George responded to an average of 7.7 service calls per month relating to criminal matters reported by Casino Hollywood. That casino no longer exists, but Leach says it was in the downtown.  The majority of calls related to counterfeit bills but also included criminal disturbances, assaults, theft and impaired drivers. According to Leach a large number of the calls were actually about things going on at businesses near Casino Hollywood.

Problem Gambling:

B.C. Lotteries Corporation says problem gambling is significantly higher in Northern B.C. than in the rest of the province.  The provincial average for those with "problems" is 4.6% while in the North, the rate is 10.2%   There is a gaming centre in Dawson Creek, and similar projects underway in Prince Rupert and Fort St John.  There is also one more northern community that has a bingo hall and is exploring the possibiity of changing to a gaming centre.    B.C. Lotteries Corp says the Province has made a committment that if the current funds set aside to pay for counsellors for treatment is used, more dollars will be made available. City Councilor Debora Munoz says the funds amount to about $23 dollars per family.

Downtown Benefit

Centre City Ventures, the downtown development arm of Initiatives Prince George stands behind the project saying it will bring people back to the downtown core especially in the evening. That will have spill off for restaurants and businesses. That feeling was echoed by Brent Stone.  He used to work in the  downtown area and noted if parking was a concern, "Take the bus, use the new public transit,  if there are so many people spilling on to the streets, then they will get a room and the rooms will be full, I would rather turn people away from my establishment than be standing there at the door trying to find a customer".

How They Voted:

Brian Skakun:  Excused  himself because of concerns over campaign contributions

Murry Krause:  Absent

Don BassermannYES    Thinks the project is forward looking. "This proposal will likely attract considerable further development in the downtown core"

Don Zurowski:    YES   From my point of view, is there any indication slots are more problematic than bingo?  I don't hear anything that would  suggest that.  He thinks the design is sensitive to the area, and supports the land use. "This is entertainment and what would our attitude be if this were a performing arts centre?"

Sherry Sethen:   YES     "It gives me comfort to know the proponent has a proven track record, he has been very generous in adressing the concerns of the community.  The concerns and doubts I had entering into this discussion have been minimized by the care and concern that have been demonstrated tonight"

Shirley Gratton:  YES    "I'm very excited about this presentation that will bring a brand new building to downtown, to capture the planters and the river rock and hopefully the beetle wood columns would have carving on them."

Glen Scott:  YES  "I've made some notes,  15 million dollar project, 60 -70 jobs and the one thing I really think we have to look at,  this is oneof the most exciting times we have seen in a long time,  we have a leading engineering firm moves downtown, 7th and Victoria, that's another positive step for downtown, the old Vienna Shnitzel house is being renovated, the Food Teller has been bought and something will go in there,  so the urban reviatalization has started."

Deborah Munoz  NO  "I consider myself a forward thinker but not at any cost."  "Placing a gaming facility next door to a residential property is not a wise decision."  "The short term economic gains willbe far outweighed by the long term social  impact." 

Mayor Colin Kinsley   YES  "Everything about this project fits into the vision of the City and that is to grow the tax base."  "This is a catlayst for further development, there will be developers looking at the decision today to see what the political will is."


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments



This is a 3rd avenue kind of project if anything. The location is wrong and it does not seem anyone had consideration for this other than the rookie.

Brian and Murry are wimps on this important matter.

Don is wrong in the kind of cliental a gaming center attracts verse a performing arts center as well as the frequency of local disturbance.

Sherry made a great pitch for an even bigger campaign donation next year.

Shirley just might if she is lucky get the trim that would make it have some class. Doesn't seem to see the bigger picture.

Glen is being a promoter. Not a strong urban planner though.

Deborah makes some sense here. Why is she the only new councillor?

Colin can't get his eyes off the pot of gold. Doesn't seem to have any long term plan with any sequence to it other than hypothetical what ifs.

The more things change the more they stay the same. I think the downtown will continue to attract the cliental they always have, and if I had a business down there I would question the shell game going on spreading the social ills to all corners. Obviously any new clean dollar developments in this town will now for sure want to locate along highway 16.

I predict it will become a monument to the destitute. An anchor for downtown Prince George.
"The provincial average for those with "problems" is 4.6% while in the North, the rate is 10.2%"

A statistic which anyone who was to invest in a gambling facility would would like to see.

People speak about hotels associated with gaming centres. That is true for casinos. Gaming Centres are different, at least at this time. This gaming centre will still be dominated by bingo. The slots are there supposedly to attract a younger crowd who it is hoped will migrate to bingo eventually.

If tht does not happen, and the slots are more popular than the bingo, how many reading this believe that BC Lotteries and the Ciyt will not switch the numbers around at the stroke of a pen?

The same goes for drinking. How many here believe that should the time come when the gaming centre is not producing as expected, that a liquor license will be sought for the premises? Drinks are free in Vagas and Reno if you are gambling.

Bingo can be had in virtually all communities. I even played bingo when I was holed up in a community of 300 or so for a week. There is no need to travel to PG for bingo. A gaming centre will generate very little in the way of hotel space need. The two hoteliers who were opposed to the proposal know that.

Casinos in BC are rarer and thus need the support of handy hotel rooms.
"The provincial average for those with "problems" is 4.6% while in the North, the rate is 10.2%"

A statistic which anyone who was to invest in a gambling facility would would like to see.

People speak about hotels associated with gaming centres. That is true for casinos. Gaming Centres are different, at least at this time. This gaming centre will still be dominated by bingo. The slots are there supposedly to attract a younger crowd who it is hoped will migrate to bingo eventually.

If tht does not happen, and the slots are more popular than the bingo, how many reading this believe that BC Lotteries and the Ciyt will not switch the numbers around at the stroke of a pen?

The same goes for drinking. How many here believe that should the time come when the gaming centre is not producing as expected, that a liquor license will be sought for the premises? Drinks are free in Vagas and Reno if you are gambling.

Bingo can be had in virtually all communities. I even played bingo when I was holed up in a community of 300 or so for a week. There is no need to travel to PG for bingo. A gaming centre will generate very little in the way of hotel space need. The two hoteliers who were opposed to the proposal know that.

Casinos in BC are rarer and thus need the support of handy hotel rooms.
Some history. The following were statements by the successful Councillors published in the newspaper during the elections. Have fun figuring out who they are.

There are three I thought made statements in opposition of a downtown gaming centre (the question asked whether they were in favour of such a centre.

---------
“I have taken a public stand against allowing expanded gambling in Prince George. The BCLC’s new concept of community gaming centres is intended to draw a newer and younger demographic of gaming consumer to its highly profitable business. Our young citizens need jobs, more recreational activities and better access to earning, not increased gambling opportunities.

----------
"I have been an outspoken opponent to slot machines. I have supported bingo in the past as it has a social component and a portion of the revenues have gone to local charities. Additional slots could spell the end of bingo and the dollars that charities so desperately need to provide services in our community."

--------
“We have a great casino in a destination location that is able to handle the gaming needs of our community. A new stand alone bingo facility without the additional gaming machines has merit. Funds spent at the gaming machines or on electronic bingo games do not generate dollars for our charities and non-profit organizations. In fact, they may reduce dollars from traditional bingos.
-----------------------

The rest were generally in support of a centre on the assumption that sepcial conditions could be met.

---------------------------
“I have some reservations about giving a stand-alone gaming centre for downtown. It should be left up to the downtown businesses to decide.”

------------------
“A stand-alone community gaming centre is one concept for the revitalization of downtown, but it’s not enough on its own. A gaming centre proposal has its strengths, but must be combined with other amenities, such as more hotel space, residential space and retail opportunities to create a more rounded vision of downtown. Many ideas have been formulated for downtown re-growth, none of which, on its own, is the magic formula.

----------------------------
“We should seriously consider any opportunity to improve our downtown and entertainment services. However, I will not support new development at any cost and must be confident, based on good information and community input that the project (like a gaming center downtown) would be an improved service and positive contribution to our downtown.

--------------------
“As part of the redevelopment of the downtown, elements of entertainment need to be an important part of the mix. The concept of a modern gaming center will require broad community consultation and a rezoning application and an attendant public hearing. These two processes will allow the community to express their views on this entertainment option.

----------------
“It’s clear the lottery corporation wants this as part of their expanded gaming plan. I will move this to a public hearing. I will not support this at final reading if charities do not get a larger share of the gaming revenue this facility would bring in.

----------------------
So, there never was any public consultation on this.

Also, there was no attempt to get other ammenities with the development such as a hotel, retail space, etc.

I do not call 6 ground floor condos plus one 600 sf retail outlet a serious attempt at providing a mixed use building.

The real question becomes, why do we have elections based on issues? Why do we not just have a popularity contest?

Hey ... wait a minute ..... that is what we have ....

;-)
For those who may be interested, here are the salient portions of the statements by those who were not elected ......

Opposed .....

1.“No”

2.“No”

3.“I do not believe it to be in the best interest of our community to expand further in the area of gambling”

4.“Prince George already has adequate gambling facilities”

5.“Not at this time. Locating the community gaming centre in the heart of Prince George would not be moving the city towards the goal of revitalizing downtown.”

6.“I would say no to more (gambling)”

7.“We don’t need any more gaming facilities in Prince George”

8.“Absolutely not because it’s a detriment to our already addiction-laden downtown.

9.“A gaming centre should be supported at Powder King ski hill to support winter sports now that we have an international airport.

Conditional support ......

1.“I fail to see what benefit the city will receive from a government sponsored gaming centre …. The only exception would be if this centre somehow brought more money back to charitable organizations.”

2.“I would only agree to a stand-alone community gaming centre if it was owned and operated by a group consisting of local non-profit organizations.”

3.“Look at this as an opportunity to attract other businesses to join with the gaming centre and build a complex of hotel space, retail and other consumer outlets.”

4.“The proposed stand alone gaming centre requires community consultation and weighing the business case against human costs”.

Supportive .....

1.“I am personally opposed to gambling. However, I will not let my personal beliefs interfere with the freedom of choice of others.”

2.“Any new business development downtown is worthy of consideration.”

3.“yes”

4.“… so why wouldn’t council approve such an initiative?”
Oh yes..... the other thing is this nonsense of a totem pole in the entrance foyer .....

what an aberration of social and cultural history .... the local First Nations did not have totem poles ....... Why is the city suddenly being inundated with this false history??? It is an embarrasment when showing vistors from Europe around who know that such artifacts belong on the Coast.
Developement at any cost is not good for the city.
As the mayor said in council; that this is our direction, to grow the tax base, $12-15M
I can see people avoiding this area of town; I for one will be one of them.
This should increase the enrollment in john school.
I believe elected leadership has a responsibility and when they do not act responsible this should be reflected on voting day. Thank you for the ONE NO VOTE.
This is a relocation of an existing facility which is on the periphery of the Central Business District closer to what could be the heart of the business district.

It will be a newer building, which means the $/square foot of the facility will be considerably more than the existing. That means more money will go just for the operation's overhead. That money will flow out of the community to lending institutes.

According to the BCLC bingo attendance is lagging in the province. The thinking is that it may be possible to bring younger people into the fold by providing electronic gaming for them. To me that looks like a money grab, not an effort to keep the social aspect of traditional bingo.

So, we are assisting in an effort to promote the continuation of gambling in a part of the province which has problem gamblers at a ratio of twice that of the entire province, and in a part of the province which I believe has the highest or one of the highest money intakes through bingo.

To appease the masses, or those on council, six ground level housing units with questionable amenities are proposed to be built on the periphery of the building and a tilden storefront of 600 square feet.

The rule is that buildings which serve the heart of downtown bring as much many diverse people to the downtown as possible. That is typically done by providing other than blank walls of a single purpose building adjacent to sidewalks. There is absolutely no socio-economic justification of taking up space for ground floor residential space. That does not bring business downtown to that part of the building.

The casino has a pub accessible from the outside as well as an internal restaurant where one can also drink. The proposed gaming centre does not even have a fast food restaurant with an outside face so that it can be accessed both from inside the centre and from the sidewalk. That would at least provide some shared-use amenity to others using the downtown.

We know from the existing bingo location that it does not generate the need for hotel spaces, otherwise hotels would have been built there rather than going up on Hwy 16 and 97. Besides, a quick survey of the patrons would have gotten the response to that.

The way the planning for this should have happened is this:

1 - Public meeting to see whether the community would support of gaming centre. The BCLC requires the support of Council for a purpose. They know a community gaming centre is different than a Canadian Tire store. A community gaming centre is not just another commercial enterprise.

2 - If the community supports such a centre, do they support it downtown or in suburbia?

3- Once that is established, and the word is “go”, then the City should have entertained proposals based on some overall criteria provided by such public input. Several of those elected stated as much, differentiating between a public hearing after the deal is virtually sealed and lot of time and money has been spent by the proponent and public input prior to the project being put together. There is a considerable difference.

This Council and this City Administration do not want real public input. The public input in this city is neither promoted nor nurtured. That is why it is virtually non existent.

Another good case in point regarding input from citizens was when the poor fellow who lives on Domano came to council last night to wonder how Administration could say that the proposed development next to his property would not impact anyone, when they did not ask him. On what basis does the planner make that statement? He has absolutely no direct data on which to make that statement. Yet it is commonly made and Council commonly eats it up.

The Official Community Plan is a reasonably well thought out document. It is a document which provides policy statements which have been approved by Council. This development, as proposed, shows once again that Councillors either do not know what is written in the OCP, or do not care what is written in the OCP. Here are some things the OCP states, none of which the proposal addresses.

The OCP shows the general location of an entertainment centre being between first and second (page 54) between Quebec and Dominion. This development does not meet with OCP requirements.

The OCP proposes higher density housing. 6 units on the ground is not higher density housing. Again, the development does not meet with the OCP.

Page 60 – Commercial buildings shall, where practical, be sited directly along property lines to encourage a pedestrian friendly shopping environment and streetscape. The implication is that CBD buildings provide shopping environments and be pedestrian friendly in not providing blank walls, thus breaking up active “walking” streets. We already have enough of this type of development. In fact, many have switched from the desired type of building to the undesirable – Oxford block, CIBC parking, BoM parking, the Brick … none promote lively downtown pedestrian oriented activities.

Entrances to commercial buildings with several retail businesses preferably closely to encourage vitality, with windows occupying the bulk of wall space facing building sidewalks.

Pedestrian weather protection shall be incorporated in buildings and site design through use of awnings, canopies and similar screening from inclement weather.

Street level facades should emphasize glazed entrances and display windows to provide a feeling of interaction between the building and the street.

This Council continues to promote development in this city which are anti downtown. Why? Why do they hate this city so much? Why do they just not get it?
Hate the city--love the money!
Why do you really care-when you stop and think about it?
If Prince George goes down the tube-I do not think you will go with it!
I know a lot of people who wonder what is really going on have basically not a worry in the world, and can live their lives out financially secure.
If the ones that it should matter to do nothing-then so be it.
The downtown is a lost cause-so let it go!
Trusted:
Because if those who know do not speak up then more and more people will fall into the trap of adictions or whatever the issue. Burying your head in the sand is a temporary fix and in the end you'll get what the employees of Exrta food got. They did nothing until the greed mongers came for them and then they suddenly started to protest in front of the Great Canadian Superstore. If they had joined those of us who have been trying to get the public to wake up, I would have more sympathy for them, but to live with your head in the sand means you are part of the problem.
This Gaming Centre will keep the Downtown people downtown, and the Casino at 16 and 97 will be utilized by the hot shot gamblers and tourists.

In all the time the Casino was downtown I am not aware of any business that was attracted there, and in fact a few went broke or moved out.

Having this facility so close to the Art Centre, Civic Centre, Library, will not be condusive to the education of younger children. In fact the message now from the NDP and Liberals is that Gambling is good, and more Gambling is gooder.

As these people who attend the Gaming Centre go broke, they will not have to walk far to get to City Hall to protest, or ask directions to the food banks.

I am ashamed of the NDP, Liberals, and Regional and Municipal politicians who support gambling. We would be far better off to allow gambling by private enterprise, so that local politicians are not caught up in the whole process because they can make money from the proceeds. This is a sad time indeed for BC and Canada.

On the upside, because you have Casinos and Gaming facilities in other areas of the Province the facilities in Prince George are going to have to get their money from the immediate surrounding area. Ie; Mackenzie, Mcbride, Vanderhoof, Burns Lake, Houston, and Prince George. Dawson Creek, Quesnel, already have Casinos.

The Fraser Ft George Regional District has a population of 101,000 people, this Includes Mackenzie, Mcbride, Valemount, and Prince George, and if you add another 50,000 for other areas the best you can do is `150,000 people. I think we can safely assume that at least 75 percent of the total population does not gamble, so therefore at best you have 37000 people in the area who gamble. This figure could be high, in any event this 37000 people lose in excess of 35 Million dollars a year. Which would be in the area of $1000.00 per year per person, however we know that a large number of people lose a lot more, and some less. The bottom line is that especially low income people cannot continue to lose this kind of money over an extended period of time, so I expect that revenues will fall for this gaming centre, and in the end it will be an unmitigated disaster.

Once again I, and a number of others could be wrong, and we are now in that position where we will just have to wait and see. The sad part is that those people responsibile will probably no longer be at City Hall when the chickens come home to roost.
Some good posts here. I would vote no, but for different reasons.
Looto BC is in the business to maximize the extraction of money out of PG, and is buying off the municipalities with a slice. More money would stay in PG if slots were allowed in pubs, and nothing in Bingo Halls.
Looto BC is a very ruthless organization, in the truest tradition of the business of servicing vise.
A freakin' totem pole - how gauche!
I will go on record as not supporting additional gaming, bingo, gambling or drinking establishments in this city. The social costs far outweigh the benefits to families and our community.

Why don't we involve the people on the other end of this problem to present the consequences of gambling, bingo, drinking and all of the associated problems like drugs, thefts, prostitution. Directly or indirectly, I believe they are inter-related. Chester
"Brian and Murry are wimps on this important matter." (posted by Chadermando)

I agree.

On the lighter side P.G. can become the Los Vegas of the North sans Agassi!
I never realized after reading all this ,is how much I love statistics and rhetoric. It certainly abounds when it comes to gambling. Talk on, dudes!