Clear Full Forecast

Report From Parliament's Hill - September 15th

By Prince George - Peace River M.P. Jay Hill

Friday, September 15, 2006 03:40 AM

    
Finally: A Good Deal For Canada’s Softwood Lumber Industry

The new softwood lumber deal between Canada and the United States was signed this week in Ottawa.  The agreement is expected to pass a vote in the House of Commons later this fall, meaning that before the end of this year, Canadian softwood producers will see roughly $5-billion CDN returned to them, money the U.S. withheld as duties since 2002. 

The agreement ensures stable and predictable access for Canadian softwood producers to the lucrative U.S. market for a full seven years.  It also takes into account the varying needs of our softwood-producing provinces and regions.  Most importantly, this deal is endorsed by an overwhelming majority of Canadian softwood lumber producers and the governments of our major softwood-producing provinces of British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec.

Here in B.C., Premier Gordon Campbell has called upon federal opposition MPs to support the deal.  As one national newspaper editorial pointed out, the Liberal premiers of those provinces have set aside partisan politics in favour of a good deal for the Canadian softwood lumber industry and now it’s time for the federal Liberals and NDP to end their “political theatre”. 

Instead, only the Bloc Quebecois appears to be heeding the softwood producers in Quebec and their provincial government. 

The Liberals didn’t “decide” they would vote against the softwood deal until they were assured that the Bloc would support it, thereby avoiding an election the Liberals know they can’t win.  Whoever ends up winning the leadership of the Liberal Party of Canada in December owes Bloc Leader Gilles Duceppe a generous Christmas present.

Our Conservative government sealed this deal just seven months after taking office.  Since the collapse of the previous Canada–U.S. Softwood agreement in 2001, the former Liberal government first ignored the plight of the softwood industry, then dithered on the file, then focussed on lobbing cheap anti-American insults across the border rather than working in the best interests of Canadian mill owners and workers.

By the time voters booted them out of office in January, the federal Liberals still had no deal and were only asking the U.S. to return $3.5-billion to Canadian softwood producers.

Not surprisingly, NDP leader Jack Layton opposes the deal.  Then again, this is the party that has some members who compare our Canadian troops to terrorists.  The NDP’s solution to the softwood dispute is an all-out trade war with the U.S.  That would leave Canadian producers with no access to U.S. customers and they would never see their tariff money returned to them.

Truly, the only ‘winners’ if this deal were to be defeated in the House of Commons would be the lawyers and lobbyists hired by big U.S. lumber companies to prolong the lumber war. 

The Canadian softwood industry has incurred enough costly litigation and lost U.S. sales.  Now that they can put those troubles behind them, many mills are already turning their focus towards strengthening their presence in the U.S. market.  Thanks to this deal, Canada’s softwood lumber industry faces several years of renewed optimism. 


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Hill:"Not surprisingly, NDP leader Jack Layton opposes the deal. Then again, this is the party that has some members who compare our Canadian troops to terrorists. "

Wow! I this an "actionable" statement or not?

Hill:"The NDP’s solution to the softwood dispute is an all-out trade war with the U.S. "

Nonsense, of course!

I know dozens, if not hundreds, of NDP members and I am aquainted with several MLAs and MPs, but I do not know of a single one who would ever liken the members of our armed forces to terrorists.

Jay Hill is a liar, and he owes the NDP and its members a cringing apology. Being an elected representative does not give him the right to spew malicious filth like this. Partisan opinions are one thing. This is sheer pig ignorance and goes well beyond any degree of Parliamentary latitude.

To Elaine and Ben, I apologise for expressing myself like this, but I do think that in this case my comments are justified.
Don't sit up waiting for an apology, it will never come except if someone takes him to task on it.

Perhaps his report from Parliament Hill enjoys some kind of parliamentary immunity?

Some politicians like to raise their own stature by pushing others down, with undeserved and untrue remarks.

Deplorable, to say the least. Let's hope that Rafe Mair's prognostication on Harper comes to fruition.
Jay Hill is sounding more and more like an extremist. I used to like him and vote for him, but I now think he just told people what they wanted to hear, road a popular movement, and never had any responsibility as opposition. Lately he sounds like the neo-cons have gotten ahold of his speach writting and give him freedom to to use missleading partisan spin for petty political lazy minded gains.
Jay Hill attempts to infer the Conservatives worked in the best interests of the Canadian lumber companies and workers.
It was a "sell out."
Thanks for nothing!