Report From Parliament's Hill - Nov.25th
By Prince George - Peace River M.P. Jay Hill

Editor’s note: These two columns got lost in cyber-space this past week, and since they are so closely connected to each other, must run back to back...
Liberals Threaten Canadian Unity Once Again (Part 1)
The Liberal Party of Canada seems determined to find new ways to break up this country.
Last Spring, when there was much speculation about who would run for the Liberal leadership, I wrote that I almost felt sympathy for my Liberal Party opponents.
The bizarre slate of potential contenders included, among others, Belinda Stronach, who had run for the Conservative Party less than a year before; Ashley MacIsaac, the self-admitted cocaine-using fiddler; Bob Rae, a man whose term as Premier of Ontario is widely acknowledged as an economic disaster; and Michael Ignatieff, an academic who hadn’t lived in Canada for 30 years.
Liberal members must have felt fortunate when MacIsaac and Stronach bowed out and Rae and Ignatieff did not. They should not feel fortunate today. In fact all Canadians should be feeling decidedly uneasy.
My previously light-hearted and rather mocking comments on the Liberal leadership woes have turned to grave concern. In the final stages of their leadership race the Liberal Party has a serious problem that threatens to plunge Canada into constitutional crisis once again.
It began when the Quebec wing of the Liberal Party voted to recognize Quebec as a nation. In an attempt to gain support in the province, Michael Ignatieff announced, "I will speak for all those Quebecers who say ‘Quebec is my nation’." And suddenly, the contentious question of Quebec’s status in our confederation has re-emerged.
The Liberal policy resolution declaring Quebec as a nation will be subject to debate and a vote at the party’s national leadership and policy convention at the end of November.
Separatists haven’t enjoyed such good fortune since the last time the Liberal Party of Canada started meddling in Quebec. Thanks to Jean Chrétien’s mismanagement of the Quebec referendum in 1995, our country barely survived intact. The Liberals followed that dismal performance by attempting to buy Quebecers’ loyalty, resulting in the sponsorship scandal.
Unfortunately, the Liberal Party’s hopeless incompetence in Quebec is not just their problem. Their actions have consistently undermined the reputation and credibility of the federal government among Quebecers. The Liberals have proven themselves a significant liability in efforts to preserve national unity.
Thanks to this latest Liberal fumble, many Quebecers are now preoccupied with whether the leadership candidates will support or reject the resolution. If Michael Ignatieff is the winner, what will happen if he reneges on his support for Quebec as a nation or if he follows through on his promise? What will Bob Rae do if he becomes Liberal leader?
No matter what the result, it’s a no-win situation with the entire nation once again embroiled in the ‘Quebec question’. This is not good for Quebec and it’s not good for Canada.
We need to focus on our economy, our healthcare system, the environment, our security and on building a healthy and prosperous future for our nation. Instead, the Liberal Party has left us with another mess.
Of course, the only way to tame this brewing constitutional storm is to ensure that Liberal problems remain Liberal problems by continuing to deny them the opportunity to form government.
----Part 2-----
(Editor’s note:Here is the second column which only made it to Opinion 250 Friday November 24th. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.)
Liberals and Bloc Thrust Canadian Unity in the Spotlight Once Again
My column last week proved to be prophetic … unfortunately.
As you will recall, in last week’s MP Report I lamented that in the heat of their leadership race, the Liberal Party of Canada had resurrected the Quebec sovereignty debate. Thanks to this latest Liberal fumble, primarily by leadership candidate Michael Ignatieff and the Quebec wing of the party, Quebeckers have once again become preoccupied with Quebec’s status in our confederation.
As I predicted, Mr. Ignatieff’s statements and the Liberal policy resolution proposing to declare Quebec as a nation has handed the separatists a golden opportunity … and they simply couldn’t pass it up. This week, the Bloc Quebecois introduced a motion for debate on their allotted ‘opposition supply day’ calling upon the House of Commons to recognize that "the Quebecois form a nation."
In order to counter these continued efforts by the Bloc to split up our country, the Prime Minister introduced a government motion that the House of Commons "recognize that the Quebecois form a nation within a united Canada."
Most importantly, it does not define the province of Quebec geographically as a nation that can separate from Canada. It concerns the "Quebecois" as a people, not "Quebec" as a legal entity. And the motion unequivocally affirms that the Quebecois belong in Canada.
The Liberals opened up this contentious issue, at a time when no one in Canada wanted to revisit constitutional strife. The Bloc saw their opening and jumped in.
This is not something the Conservative Government wanted on the federal agenda. We are focussed upon our economy, our healthcare system, the environment, our security and on building a healthy and prosperous future for Canada. Yet once again, the Liberals have created a mess that the rest of us are left to try and clean up.
I believe the Prime Minister said it best in his address to Parliament:
"The leader of the Bloc and his separatist friends are not concerned with defining who Quebeckers are, but rather, what they want them to become – a separate country.
The separatists don’t need the parliament of Canada to define what is meant by the sociological term "nation", but the Bloc has now asked us to define the Quebecois, so we must take a position.
Our position is clear – do the Quebecois form a nation within Canada? The answer is yes.
Do the Quebecois form an independent nation? The answer is no. And the answer will always be no.
Because Quebeckers from Cartier and Laurier to Mulroney and Trudeau have led this country and millions like them have helped build it.
And with their English and French speaking fellow citizens, and with the people drawn from all the nationalities in the world, they have been part of making this country what it is – the greatest country on earth – a shining example in a dangerous and divided world, of the harmony and unity of which all peoples are capable.
And we will do what we must, what our forefathers always have, to preserve this country – a Canada, strong, united, independent and free."
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home
I have no problem with British Columbians being considered a nationality. I think it recognizes that we are not mere pawn provinces of a dominion, but rather independent peoples of a true confederation.
I support Ignatieff on this one.