Clear Full Forecast

Taxation Priorities :One Man's Opinion

By Ben Meisner

Wednesday, January 24, 2007 03:45 AM

   The importance in dealing with taxation with any form of government is first to determine the priorities of the taxpayers and then, as best you can, play out their wishes.

The federal and provincial government have both heard from the people that they feel they would prefer a reduction in services and with it a reduction of taxes.

Taxpayers have generally said we no longer wish to be slaves to the government of all levels.

Now having said all that, we are constantly told that the municipal level of government has found itself a victim of down loading by the senior levels.
That argument might have made a great deal of sense in years gone by. But it simply will not fly today and taxpayers in most cities now agree that they also would like their respective municipality to get back to the basics.

What was the purpose for the forming of a municipality, water, sewer, roads, police and fire protection? 

Somewhere, however along the road, we have lost those priorities and now find ourselves faced with a possible 4% increase in local taxes just to try and bring back up to standard a road structure that should have been maintained all along.

We have spent taxpayer money in many instances in recent years serving a small segment of our society.

Small lobby groups have been able to get the ear of Council and with it, make their way into the public purse. Suddenly the game has caught up with us, there is no guarantee that the 4% will be the total increase in taxes, bearing in mind there are other requirements that will likely see taxes increase.

For example, the new sports center at UNBC will cost the city, on average $300,000 a year. Coupled with this growing demand on the municipal purse has been the fact that municipalities have become hooked on gambling revenue, police fine revenue, gas tax revenue and the revenue from Terasen gas. All of which come with a price tag on society.

Instead of holding public meetings in the city to follow the lead of the federal and provincial government in finding ways to cut the municipal costs, we are about to hold meetings to sell us on the idea of a tax increase.

As we have seen in the past, regardless of what may be said at these get togethers, the die in most cases has already been cast.

I’m Meisner and that’s one man’s opinion.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

I notice by the poll on this web site 20% approve of the proposed 4% tax levy and 79% say no. I hope 20% will not be the only people showing up at the input seminars the City is having.

Cheers
I agree with Ben, doesn't matter what the public thinks. When the City makes a proposal like this, you may as well take it as that is what they are going to do.
10-4
Its not over till the *F* lady sings. If enough pressure is put on the City they will back away from this endeavour. They do not have a good case for going to a 4% tax levy, especially when they have been doing the opposite for the last 10 or so years.

Once again this looks like a proposal put forward by the Mayor and a few of his co-horts who will now hide in the bushes until the dust settles.

I certainly expect to hear something about this proposal from the other Councillors, and from the City Manager, City Clerk.

There are a number of questions that have to be answered on this proposal and I would hope that as many people as possible turn out to the meetings.

I suggest that the 20% of the people in favour of the 4% levy probably live in the Regional District. They enjoy all the facilities of the City, including the roads, however they would be exempt from the 4% levy, or maybe they are renters, or apartment dwellers and feel that they will not have to pay the levy. In any event time will tell.