Justice, Making It Fast and Affordable
By 250 News
(from left to right) Deputy Attorney General Allan Seckel, Chief Justice Donald Brenner and Prince George Chamber President Micheal Kerr chat following a luncheon presentation
So your neighbour has trimmed off a limb of one of your trees. You want to have the matter resolved and you decide to go to court.
In B.C. 98 % of civil cases are resolved before they actually get to court, but are the cases wrapping up because the two sides are able to reach a suitable agreement, or is it because the litigants simply cannot afford to take the matter to court? "That is a very good question and that is a question that troubles me" says Chief Justice Donald Brenner
He says cases settle for three reasons: "The first two are positive, the last one is the one that concerns me" . The Chief Justice says more cases are being resolved through increasing use of alternate dispute resolution methods, and efforts by the Court to assist the parties and resolve the dispute. "The third one, the one that troubles me, is cost, and I worry that people are not able to proceed through to a final formal decision in their case because it is just too expensive, and that is what we are trying to address.'
In B.C. there have been 6 words used to describe the civil court process "Too expensive, too complex, too slow" The proposed changes to the process are designed to reduce costs and speed up the process.
One change would see limits on the time spent on examinations for discovery, a process that can go take a great deal of time when the meter is running for all involved in that process with the litigants paying the bill.
There is also a suggestion for something called the "Hub". Consider it a one stop spot for those entering the system to find out how their particular dispute could be resolved. It would be a multi-disciplinary assessment service, a legal "triage" if you like that will diagnose the legal problem and provide a referral.
The changes also call for limits to be placed on the length of trials and the addition of case planning which means lawyers for both sides will have to open lines of communication to see how a case would proceed rather than, as Deputy Attorney General Allan Seckel remarked, lawyers saying "lets get out the spitballs and have some fun".
There will be a draft of the new rules ready by June of this year. The Deputy Attorney General Allan Seckel says that will give the legal profession time to look over the changes "kick the tires and provide feed back". Then more consultation and feedback through the fall, legislation likely in the spring of 2008, and implementation by 2009 - 2010.
Chief Justice Brenner says it will never be inexpensive to litigate a case in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, "Our Court deals with serious issues and issues that are very serious to the parties. Of course we always like to see them retain trained professionals to advance their case, but what we hope to do is make it more affordable and more efficient."
Feedback is critical says Deputy Attorney General Allan Seckel, "Standing silent is not helpful to us".
The complete recommendations can be viewed at www.bcjusticereview.org or suggestions for change can be e-mailed to civiljustice@bcjusticereview.org
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home
Mentioning the word "JUSTICE" to the boys who love the use of "spitballs."
Spoil their fun-lessen their pocketbooks-I think not.
I just bet if a survey were taken, there would be a lot of "lawyer haters" in the city. Someone ought to start up a site whereby the public can give their opinion on these, in my opinion, parasites.
Those "tire kickers" will kick the wheels off of any new rules affecting their billing procedures.
Give the public a chance to offer some "feedback."
There is no reasonable reason why the average person cannot have access to the courts at an affordable figure.
Just what kind of protection system is enjoyed by these lawyers and judges?
And to boot, they consider themselves above the law.
I have to agree, as they have a bond-and after all, the judge is also a lawyer.
Seems like they have it all wrapped up-and as they are spewing out spitballs, you better believe the litigants in the case are paying-and plenty.
The best liars get the $300.00 plus an hour.
There are lawyers who do not get involved with litigation. They cannot lie good enough, and honesty destroys their chances of a win.
As long as they can keep a case open they are filling their pockets. There are 2 poor suckers paying, while the lawyers are making deals.
Watch that crown prosecutor get off in that Vancouver traffic case, causing a death.
Justice will not be served in that courtroom either.