Clear Full Forecast

Pothole Patch Request Denied

By 250 News

Monday, April 30, 2007 10:15 PM

Car dodges pothole on a  Prince George street (photo opinion250 staff)

Councilor Brian Skakun wanted his  Prince George Council Colleagues to take a second look at  a service enhancement that was  rejected during the budget discussions this year. His Council colleagues disagreed.

"Enhanced Pothole Patching"  was a request for $213 thousand dollars, to add a third- two person crew for day or afternoon shifts throughout the spring, summer and fall.  The initiative also required the purchase of an additional Thermolay  Hot Box and truck chassis.

Development Services said the enhancement was needed because " existing crews have difficulty meeting the current service level objectives of a response to complaints within two working days of receipt of a pothole complaint."

Skakun says the condition of the roads is not only an eyesore which has a negative impact on tourism or  potential new business, he  is also concerned  the City may be held responsible for  safety issues or damage to vehicles caused by the  potholes.  "I have never seen  potholes so bad" says Skakun.  He says although he knows the City has only paid out about $3,000 in the past  for pothole claims  he says  "Frankly  any amount being paid out over claims is too much" says Skakun.

He wants the money to come from the accumulated surplus. There is $7.9 million in surplus, and  using the surplus for this item and  the other  half million dollars in projects approved would leave about $7.2 million.

Development Services Bob Radloff says the addition would  mean more potholes could be filled faster.

The final vote was:  Councilors Munoz and Skakun in favour

Councillors Bassermann, Sethen Zurowski, Krause, Scott and Bassermann opposed.

Mayor Colin Kinsley and Councilor Shirley Gratton were absent.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Privatize the pot hole crew. Must be a way to get better performance.
why would any of the counsellors be opposed to this? Hopefully moose's car will get swallowed up.....or damaged...then he'll bitch!
This is such a no-brainer! Why wouldn't council finally actually do something that would keep the public happy at such a small price. Time has long past to get rid of some of the deadbeats that have been holding this city back for years!
I will never vote for that ass again Glen ....... amen ..... this city is going down hill
Glen does seem to have a difficult time grasping what is going on at most council meetings. Doesn't seem to bother him though! HeeHee!
"Councillors Bassermann, Sethen, Zurowski, Krause, Scott and Bassermann opposed."

Bassermann got to vote twice? This is what happens when the Mayor is away...

:-)



Moose actually could not figure out how come increasing crews from 2 crews to 3 crews is a 50% improvement.

Of course, I expect several on here to have problems with that too ......

;-)

Why would we want more pothole filled faster? ... what an assinine idea? Administration basically siad they need some addtional funds in order to meet the minimum service standard they have set. Council is not giving it to them because 6 weeks ago they said no.

Guess what guys and gals, 6 weeks ago we still had winter and the full extent of the new crop of potholes was not known .... things change in the world of potholes ..... but oh no .... we have to stay with what we decided yesterday because we have to stick to principles .... we care about principles, we do not care about people's safety and their property.

Heard ya, loud and clear!!!!!!

He forgot to vote on another issue ... so he was owed one....
If everyone in PG sent in a claim at the same time they might do something. I am sure there is a requirement to proccess claims which would take some serious time to do. They would get turned down but the backlog would be overwhelming much like it is for drivers dodging the potholes.
Why was there was no explanation by the councillors as to why they turned this down?
Once upon a time I read that some guy down in the United States got arrested for filling in a pothole himself. The arrest was based on the guy messing around with city property or sumthin'. I never did find out what happened to the guy. Food fer thought, maybe? Plant a tree? Fill in a pothole? Possible.
We have plenty of campaign promises to fill empty potholes with. Or was it empty campaign promises ?....I can't remember.
http://flickr.com/photos/thomasnguyencom/37098450

Look at this for a pothole.

If someone had the time, they could just take a day and go on pothole patrol, take pictures, and post them to a web site.
Maybe someone could start a contest. Biggest in area, deepest, most in a series.... etc.

http://flickr.com/photos/eloisemason/462931173
http://flickr.com/photos/66816733@N00/385681742

Of course we could just start a sign program to place these around town ... much cheaper than fixing them.

;-)
We could also take advantage of them and develop a pothole tourism program. Give Philadelphia a run for their money.


http://flickr.com/photos/criminalintent/12691323
http://flickr.com/photos/planetmike/399867975

If we are not careful, DFO will get involved and we wont be able to fill them anymore since they have become salmon bearing.
we know we are doing well if we can't find one this size yet ...

http://flickr.com/photos/ticotexan/198468792
That last one wasn't down town was it!...lol