Clear Full Forecast

BC Rail sale: Absolute power corrupts absolutely

By Peter Ewart

Wednesday, May 16, 2007 03:45 AM

 It has not been a pretty sight. 

Statements from a top RCMP official that corruption at the highest levels of government in the province threaten the very democratic process itself.

Allegations that the BC Rail bidding process four years ago was “tainted” and “fixed” from the very beginning, that the two government aides charged were simply following orders, that the criminal investigation was compromised, allowing higher officials in government and key federal and provincial Liberal Party operatives to escape scrutiny. 

Most recently, it has been alleged that secret bidding information was found in a private home and in the office of a political lobbying firm (Bill Tieleman, “24 Hours,” May 8 / 07). 

Lawyers for the government aides also claim that hecklers and phony protesters were hired by government officials to throw mud at those opposed to the Campbell government’s policies.  In addition, government officials set up phony calls to radio talk shows.  And so on. 

Locally, at least one phony call is said to have been made to a talk show that was moderated by Ben Meisner, a prominent opponent of the BC Rail sale.  Government and Liberal party officials are also alleged to have had conversations about how to discredit MLA Paul Nettleton who was a privatization opponent (for which he was kicked out of the Liberal Caucus). 

Even the entire rationale for the sale - that certain Interior mayors and community leaders had requested that BC Rail be sold and that the provincial government was simply responding to this request - is more and more looking like it was orchestrated by the Premier’s office.  Indeed, as one layer of this political onion is peeled away, yet another reveals itself.

Drugs, bribing of public officials, breach of trust, media manipulation, political orchestration – it sounds like something out of the television show “The Sopranos.”  Citizens of this province could be excused for thinking that they have elected a kind of political “mafia” whose main purpose is to manipulate, bamboozle and swindle the electorate in the interests of certain powerful multinational corporate backers. 

Unfortunately, it may be that this entire scandal has erupted to the extent it has for one simple reason: While one section of big business profited from the sale of BC Rail, another section felt that it had been “screwed” and has got its nose out of joint.  For example, consider the statements by losing bidder CP Rail criticizing the bid process, and, more recently, the comments by corporate suppliers that CN is squeezing them because of its monopoly position. 

But the problems that the BC political process are facing are not just the case of a few “bad apples” – the problem is also a systemic one.  Under the current political process, when a government gets elected to power, it takes on dictatorial or semi-dictatorial powers for the four years until the next election. 

For example, Dave Barrett, former NDP Premier quipped to the press when his government was elected back in the 1970’s, “the Queen gave us the whole bag”, meaning that the Premier’s office has great powers, and that “once power has been bestowed … it is the government’s prerogative to use it.”  In effect, when the Premier gets elected, he or she controls the party apparatus, the party whip, the cabinet, the government ministries, and the legislature – and there is little or any check on this power. 

The province, as a result, ends up being run out of the Premier’s office, and the electorate be damned.  Election promises, like the one the Premier made not to sell BC Rail, end up being as worthless as a burned out flare by a railway track.

As Lord Acton wrote in 1887:  “Where you have a concentration of power in a few hands, all too frequently men with the mentality of gangsters get control.  History has proven that.  All power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely.”

It is a strange fact of modern political life that these entities we call political parties have such enormous power, even though they have at best only 1 or 2% of the population as members.  Indeed, they continually seek to expand and increase their power at the expense of the electorate, rather than vice versa.  In that respect, political parties have become like monopolies and cartels, and, as such, in their current form, are blocking rather than advancing the democratic process.

The BC Rail scandal is giving us a brief glimpse as to how the political party process works in this province.  If there is one lesson that comes out of this scandal, it is that we, as British Columbians, need to talk more about how we can develop new forms of democracy that empower, rather than disempower the electorate, that put into practice the principle that all power must flow from the people, rather than being concentrated in the hands of political parties of one stripe or another, and the special interests that back them.

Note:  A public meeting is scheduled for 7pm, Wednesday, May 16 at Prince George’s CNC campus in room 1-306.  The meeting will give an update on the trial of the government aides charged with breach of trust in the BC Rail scandal.  Speakers include: Ron East, Ben Meisner and Bill Tieleman.

   
Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

WOW!
And to think old Glen clarke scandal was that he had a deck built!
Not so. He suggested by his initial comments that he knew the fellow who built his deck *just barely* because the man lived down the street from him and the children just happened to be going to the same school.

Further investigation revealed that the man actually lived with the person who he built the deck for - in the same cottage for at least a couple of weeks while doing the work.

This was revealed in the media shortly afterwards.

When one makes statements that turn out to be false suspicions are aroused that something is not quite on the up and up.

Often public figures make statements that are meant to be a initial attempt to discourage further scrutiny - but they rarely ever get away with it.

I remember the story quite well and followed it with a lot of interest as politics in B.C. can be very entertaining indeed.

I also track the (broken) election promises of the present government - it doesn't look as if much has changed.

They make them - they break them. And, Mr. Ewart, it is not a question of how many members each party has - what matters is how many votes each party gets at election time.





Since diplomat has raised the subject of "the deck" it is appropriate to compare the actions of the Attorney General in that case compared to the Attorney General in this case. Dosanjh relatively quickly gave the go ahead for charges to be laid so that the courts could decide whether there was any impropriety.

The Judge in that case (the same person as in this case) made it clear that there was no impropriety and was very critical of the accusations and the way they had been politically driven, by Gordon Campbell's office assistants as I recall and without his knowledge if he is to be believed (yeah, right).

What has Wally Oppal done about the accusations that senior Liberal politicians used public money for partisan political purposes. Nothing. He refuses to comment and is shielding his political buddy boys from investigation. Why? Obviously, for self serving political reasons. He displays contempt for the principles of law on which our legal and political systems rest.
I agree 100% with what Peter had to say. I think the BCSTV proposal would go a lot of the way to taking the power of the premier out of the check and balance process of our legislature.
Ammonra, if you go back a bit you will be able to see that it was *jonnypg* who raised the issue of the deck, not I.

The building of the deck really was not the issue at all. When a person in a position of trust (like a Premier) engaged in a public exercise of fuzzification, the RCMP was naturally impelled to investigate further and it looked absolutely awful to Joe Public at large.

You are outlining a scenario where the Attorney General of B.C. in your opinion "...displays contempt for the principles of law on which our legal and political systems rest."

That's pretty heady stuff and a very serious allegation.

Since this matter is indeed being legally dealt with at this point in time perhaps the Attorney General is using the proper caution and we will all have to wait until the final verdict is in.



You are right, diplomat, I overlooked the second post. Change my reference to you to him.

The accusations against the politicians are **NOT** being dealt with at this time. The accusations are being raised in the context of a defence against criminal charges by Basi, Basi and Virk. The accusations those three have made in court through their lawyer should, by now, have stimulated SOME action by the Attorney General, the RCMP, the Liberal Caucus or the Liberal Party executive. None of them have done a thing.

Note that those accusations include using taxpayer's money for partisan political purposes by paying people to heckle and goad at call in shows and demonstrations, and paying money to people who had publicly approved of the CN deal, and who in Cabinet approved of that. As well, there are serious questions as to why bribery charges have not been laid against some people whose only excuse seems to be their connection to the Liberal party and, let us not forget, whether a senior Liberal Cabinet member improperly interfered in an RCMP investigation.

You are correct on one point, it is not about the deck. It is about the different standards used by the two Attorney Generals and the trust put in them to uphold our legal system. Ujjal Dosanjh chose to facilitate charges when he thought their *MIGHT* be a possibility of wrongdoing. His approach was the proper one, even though he turned out to be wrong when the case was concluded and Clarke was exonerated.

Compare that with Wally Oppal. All he has done is stick his head in the Liberal sewer and close his eyes. That way he can't see what's going on! Where are his ethics? Where is the trust in him?
Lets also take note of the fact almost total domination of the media by government friendly big business. How do you think Meisner was sent packing. With control of the media by government by proxy, and the fact the power base is in the lower mainland, the fib libs know they can get away with anything. Does anyone in the lower mainland give two hoots about BC Rail I doubt it considering all the money being thrown around down there.