Clear Full Forecast

New Orleans: Beignets and broken infrastructure

By Peter Ewart

Saturday, September 03, 2005 04:00 AM


By Peter Ewart

My wife and I were in New Orleans just a couple of months ago, and, as part of our daily tramp through the colourful, humming, noisy downtown, we would stop at a restaurant that served strong, black coffee and mounds of that sinfully delicious New Orleans version of the doughnut – the beignet. These beignets come dusted with powdered white sugar that ends up all over your hands, chin and cheeks no matter how delicately you try to eat them.

While we chewed on our beignets and listened to the old black jazz trumpeter on the sidewalk wailing out a song, we couldn’t help notice the high levee that loomed up just a few feet away. On the other side of the levee, is the great, lumbering Mississippi river as it approaches the Gulf of Mexico. After our coffee and beignets, we climbed the stairs to the top of the levee. And it is only then that it became clear to us that the river was higher than the ground on the other side. Indeed, much of New Orleans is below the level of the river and of Lake Ponchartrain.

The only thing that stands in the way of all this vast expanse of water is the levees that surround New Orleans. And it is this infrastructure, the levees, that gave way to the enormous destructive power of Hurricane Katrina. As a result, a tragedy has enveloped the great city of New Orleans. The city could do without its sugared beignets and still survive, but it cannot do without its levees and other infrastructure as the flooded streets, destroyed homes, and upended lives so tragically reveal.

How could this happen? How could this city be devastated in one fell swoop by a tropical storm system? After all, New Orleans is part of “hurricane alley”. Every year, hurricanes come barreling up the Gulf of Mexico, and one part or another of the Gulf Coast is hit. And this has been going on since the time New Orleans was born in the midst of tobacco, bales of cotton, and slave markets, hundreds of years ago. Hurricane Katrina was a Level 4 hurricane. But it turns out that the levee infrastructure around New Orleans was designed to protect against only a Level 3 hurricane. Why? No one seems to know, although prominent scientists and engineers have warned the federal government repeatedly over the past few years that a disastrous storm was inevitable.

Furthermore, reports are coming out that funding that had been promised to repair and upgrade the levees had been slashed by the Bush administration and diverted to help pay for the invasion of Iraq. Clearly, the evacuation plan was seriously flawed, with spectacular and appalling levels of incompetence shown at the federal and state government levels, leaving many people, especially the poor, elderly, and disabled behind to face the hurricane. It is fine to say that they should have left, but it is becoming apparent that many did not leave because they had no place to go, no means to get there, and no money to pay for accommodation. In other words, little, if any, planning was done to deal with the problems facing the tens of thousands of residents with no money; and New Orleans, despite all its skyscrapers and gleaming tourist attractions, has many who are desperately poor.

Thus the people of that once lively and beautiful city are finding out just how, in modern society, everyone and everything is so vitally dependent on infrastructure, whether it be roads, rail, electricity, heat, fuel, or communications.

We look with sympathy upon the plight of the people of New Orleans and with shock at how fast the infrastructure that glued the city and state together utterly collapsed. Yet how far away are we, in Northern BC, from a similar plight? What would happen if natural gas and / or electricity flows were interrupted in the middle of winter when it is minus 40 degrees below zero? What would happen if a train derailed in the bowl area of Prince George city and released clouds of a toxic gas such as chlorine? These events are not science fiction, but very real possibilities.

One would think then, that our infrastructure must have the highest priority, not only to maintain our quality of life, but also to prevent New Orleans types of disasters. Yet, we allow foreign companies, often with dubious track records and based thousands of miles away, to run our infrastructure, the lifeblood of our society.

Take for example our railways. CN Rail was privatized by the Federal Government in the early 1990s, and the same thing happened to BC Rail only a couple of years ago. Today, CN Rail (which now owns BC Rail) is an American based company with a questionable safety record (seven derailments in BC and Alberta in the last month alone). Sooner or later, if things proceed as they have, one of these derailments is going to unleash a disaster of unprecedented proportions for our city and region.

Then we have our natural gas, which is absolutely vital for homeowners, businesses, and institutions all year round, but especially in the frigid depths of our northern winters. Yet, we are cavalierly allowing another American monopoly, Kinder Morgan, to take over our vital natural gas infrastructure, and, most bizarrely, some of our politicians and media are hailing this as some great thing for us.

Kinder Morgan has made no secret that its main aim in buying Terasen Gas was to get control of the pipelines that ship oil and gas to the U.S. and other countries. The gas infrastructure for home and business in BC appears to be only of sideline interest. What kind of priority will this infrastructure way up here in the North have if Kinder Morgan gets into financial trouble? Do alarm bells get raised when we learn that the CEO of Kinder Morgan was a former executive in the disgraced and bankrupt company Enron?

The American government and corporate elite does not even prioritize the infrastructure of its own cities like New Orleans. And we have seen their appalling lack of competence regarding that unfortunate city. Why should British Columbians expect to be treated any better if some catastrophe is inflicted on us?

We, too, like the residents of New Orleans, can do without our sugared doughnuts, whether they are beignets or Tim Horton’s. But we can’t do without our infrastructure. We should make sure that it always stays in our hands and that it always has the highest priority. But we need elected representatives and governments who will fight for this, not fawn before every foreign monopoly, which in the words of a spokesperson for Kinder Morgan, want to establish their “footprint” in our province. The last thing we want is to become, like New Orleans, another disaster story on CNN.

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Thanks for enlightening us about new orleans and your take on infrastructure....i agree. What is Happening to us? As canadians we can be our own self sufficient country why are we letting the American government run canada too? It truly is sad that one day we will have to answer to the president, that is what George bush wants isn't it!
Makes me feel ill when reality slaps me in the face when reading an article such as this, and knowing the legacy we will probably leave to our grandchildren.
Canada is no longer a "free" country.
Why are we selling ourselves so short????
Bush thought fighting a war in Iraq was more important than protection of his own people in the States.
Would those same people vote for him now???
Probably.
Took him days to even view this major catastrophe. Does he really care??? I think not.
Does our Provincial government care??? Does our Federal Government care? Does our Civic Government care???
Why do we not ponder an answer to those questions??
Or do We really care???
Thank you Peter for writing what I was thinking of writing. However, it was suggested that I do not since it might cause concern.

What I will be doing, and what others should be doing, is to find out exactly what the emergency plans for this region are.

It is exactly the scenario of a chlorine tanker in the "bowl" involved in an accident on a cold winter day with an inversion which I would be concerned about. That could easily involve a quick evacuation of 30,000+ people to higher ground for a week or more.

People in the bowl tend to be older, infirm in old age homes and the hospital, possibly without their own means of transportation. Do we, for instance, have an inventory of such individuals so that public assistance can be provided to them? Can we mark the houses so that they are immediately "visible" by emergency agencies responsible for evacuating them?

We also have people in hotels who may not have cars.

It goes on and on ....

Why this topic gets obfuscated with the USA versus Canadian ownership of resources and resource tranporting infrastructure is beyond me. We are responsible for our safety, no matter who "owns" the infrastructure.

This municipality, regional district, province and country are responsible for such emergency measures plans. Let's not pass the buck such as the mayor of New Orleans is partially doing.

So, ask those responsible for public safety what the plan is in case of emergency. Where are our shelters? Are they adequately stocked with water, food, clothes, bedding, meds, etc? Are there people assigned to take control of them who understand how to handle people under stress?

What are we doing to reduce the likelyhood of such a disaser? Can we remove the source of the potential disaster? Can we move the rail tracks out of the bowl over time? Can we move industry which uses such chemicals out of the bowl over time?

Bottom line ... we put our governments in place and we deserve to have some level of assurance that actions will click properly in disaster situations, that mitigative planning is taking place and that we are made aware of what these plans are.

We are supposed to have fire drills in office and public buildings and I know that some if not all have them on an annual basis. There are escape routes marked on the back of hotel room doors directing people to exit stairs. When participating in major meetings and conferences, those facilitators who are safety minded begin the session by explaining where the exit doors are and where they lead to.

In my opinion, the New Orleans situation should be a wake up call for other cities and its inhabitants, including our own.

Lets all make a point of calling City Hall and start the process of getting a public education on what our situation is. Take control of your own safety and the safety of your fellow citizens. Don't just be gawkers.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/01/07/train.wreck/
Peter I agree especially your take on essential public infrastructure that is monopolized like railbed, hiways, water, sewer, and energy grids.

Privatization of these essential infrastructure should be viewed as treason, and is ussually motivated by the personal greed of elected officials. Its this lack of fiduciary duty and a system that facilitates a fiduciary atmosphere that is the greatest threat to our public preperation for disasters of all types. In short paid politicians ussually focus on where the money is comming from and not who they are in name representing.
Usually should have been always.
Also of problem is the politicians who represent their constituents in a parochial view that takes advantage of a minority. IE Vancouver in relation to Northern BC, or Ontario in relation to the West and the Maritimes.
The difference between the flooding aftermath of New Orleans and the surge of water (tsunami-like) aftermath in Biloxi.

New Orleans analysis
http://digitalglobe.com/images/katrina/Hurricane_Katrina-New_Orleans.pdf

Biloxi Analysis
http://digitalglobe.com/images/katrina/Hurricane_Katrina-Biloxi.pdf

Mississippi Coastline Analysis
http://digitalglobe.com/images/katrina/Hurricane_Katrina-Mississippi_Coastline.pdf

High resolution digital images
http://digitalglobe.com/katrina_gallery.html
Well put dude,
You have however impressed some sad individuals posting above me. They however probably missed the key point. George W.'s hack and slash policies are the same style as are man Gordie's from Victoria and Creeep Stevie Harper would be worse than ol George W. and I know some poster's above me sup[port ol stevie as well. So shame on all of you for not seeing the point. Pay attention.


later.........