Clear Full Forecast

Koester Took Time to Make Statement on Shooting of Ian Bush

By 250 News

Wednesday, July 04, 2007 05:56 PM

             

RCMP Corporal Rich Murray, the lead investigator in the shooting death of Ian Bush at the RCMP detachment  in  Houston, told a Coroner’s inquest today that Constable Paul Koester refused to re-enact the fight and the subsequent shooting of Bush because he could not remember all of the events correctly.

Koester also refused to have his statement to police either recorded or video taped on instructions from his lawyer.

Despite repeated attempts to get him to give a statement to police, on the instructions of his lawyer, no statement was immediately forthcoming. The reasons varied from his mother telling the investigators that Paul was not up to it, or Koester was unable to put proper words together much less statements as he rested at his family’s home in Kamloops.

Under questioning by Howard Rubin, the Bush family’s lawyer,  Corporal Murray told the jury that his department, (Major Crimes) submitted the questions to Koester’s lawyer and from those questions the draft statement was built.

Promises where made that Koester would be available to make a statement and then when police did arrive at the lawyer’s office they did not examine the statement written up by Koester. They said they wanted to take their own,"pure" statement on the matter. That draft statement was later destroyed and what it contained is not known.

Koester’s lawyer advised the police that he would not allow his client to give a “pure “statement and the matter dragged on. The lawyer, Brian Gilson of Prince George, also said he would not allow Koester to take part in a reconstruction of events.

Rubin asked, "Do you always give a list of questions to the person you are getting a statement from, did you negotiate what questions would be asked?". Murray told the jury that ten police officers and numerous others had investigated Ian Bush’s death

While Constable Paul Koester did not make an immediate statement to police, the young people who were with Bush at the arena said that was not the case with them.

In at least two instances, police took statements from them the day following the shooting. Others in the group were asked and gave statements in the following few days.

At the same time, Coroner Shane DeMeyer said he would not allow the security officer at the Houston arena to appear and give her testimony as to the demeanor of Constable Darren Woroshelo the night of the shooting.

Woroshelo was Koester’s senior officer.

The security chief of the Houston arena has said that Woroshelo came into the arena the night of the shooting all red, with his neck bulging at the collar .She says that he yelled at her to a point where she found it necessary to take the next morning off from work.

The Coroner said that he believed her evidence would be of little value to the jury.

The picture that has emerged at the inquest is that several of Bush’s friends had gathered at an apartment near the arena, had a few drinks and went over to the game. They went back to the apartment during the second period and removed the beer they had there moving it to their vehicles after the land lady had complained of the noise they were making going up and down the stairs.

Bush had about three to four beers they say, he didn’t want to drink more because he said he had heart burn.

Robert Tobin, who resided at the apartment in question, told the jury that Bush was not drunk. "He was not sober," as Tobin puts it, "but he was in no way drunk."

On October 29th, 2005 Ian Bush was  found to have an open beer outside the arena, and was arrested for failing to give his proper name.  He was  handcuffed, taken to the detachment, and  within half  an hour, he had been shot in the back of the head, and lay dead in the interview room of the Houston detachment.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

not drunk, but not sober????
What has not come out yet is that he drinks the 0.5% alcohol stuff. I suspect the Coroner will not find that to be important for the jury and will not admit it as information.

;-)
mummy said I can't talk to you right now. Try that at a real inquest and see what it brings. This from a grown man and R.C.M.P. officer? Only would the R.C.M.P use this as an excuse.
This is sickening,I am at a loss for words.
IMO,this is beyond a doubt, one of the most disturbing and bizarre cases I have ever heard.
This is not a coroners inquest,it is a horror story, and it's not over yet.
No true justice will come from this inquest.
It cannot be allowed to end here if we are ever to feel safe again.
The very foundations of our justice system is being shaken to it's core and there is little we can do to prevent it.
My condolences to the Bush family and to all of us!
He's exercising the rights of an accused person, without having been accused of anything.
The real story here is that in Canada the RCMP no longer respect the rule of applying the law equally to all in the country no matter what that individual or organizations position in society is.

The rule of law used to be part of the lore of the RCMP that gave the force the respect they had in going about their business....



Let me correct some falsehoods. BC cops (as in New Brunswick and Quebec) cannot register a criminal charge; they may submit a Report to Crown Counsel, but police services are only recommending bodies. Koester was well aware that prosecutors could NOT proceed on an Obstruction charge against Ian Bush. To sustain that charge there must be an intent to either delay or defeat justice, and a present ability to carry it out. Although Bush gave false names to Koester as a goof, the fact that he carried Identification that was both available to police and was presented, negates Obstruction.

Duty prosecutors are available to cops, 24-7. Koester had NO intention of contacting them, let alone submitting a report. And he knows that he can't legitimately peddle the arrest as an investigative detention, given exculpatory evidence, as presented by Bush. During the first Inquiry, Koester said that he didn't ticket Bush for a Provincial offence, because he "forgot" to bring his ticket book. Had he ticketed Bush, he would have been empowered to settle the ID issue.

So why was Ian Bush arrested? In 1992, Judge James Kolts produced a study of excessive force in the Los Angeles Sherrif's Dept. He found that cops enforce an ersatz offence: CONTEMPT OF COP. Anyone who either humiliates a cop or questions cop authority is targeted for abuse. Koester was 6 inches taller than Bush; Koester was trained in the absolute ease in breaking a choke hold (lift elbows against attacker's arms); Koester saw to it that he was alone with Bush in the Department; Koester knew that the arrest was unlawful. Do the math.

What happens when cops are allowed to control a Coroner's process? Send me an e-mail at S102457@hotmail.com and I will send a copy of official Report into the shooting of a man by a Vancouver cop. The man stabbed (?) a cop with a dry wall saw, and then backed off. He was angry because the police vehicle was blocking a bus stop while he waited for transit. When he approached the car to protest, the cop slammed the door into him. An angry cop shot him to death "from a distance" after the danger passed. The Coroner' report includes a police scripted motivational framework to explain the dead man's conduct, while questioning nothing of police conduct. It was both a whitewash and a smear of a dead man.

Be aware: because Justice Institute training modules for Coroner service, overlap with police training, a cop can train as a Coroner in a paltry 80 days. Former Vancouver Mayor, Larry Campbell, trained in less time, as a city cop. Now a Senator, he consulted with the BS programme, "Da Vinci's Inquest." It requires over 800 days of schooling to become a doctor; Coroner's aren't medical professionals. Coroner's are cop slaves.