Clear Full Forecast

Now Let's See What Canfor Is All About:One Man's Opinion

By Ben Meisner

Thursday, July 12, 2007 03:45 AM

        

The freeing up of a huge tract of timber in the Mackenzie area with Canfor having the same opportunity as other forest companies working the area, will finally put to rest the question of whether Canfor really has the future of Mackenzie in mind.

A recent gab fest with a bunch of truckers who work the area around Mackenzie didn’t suggest to me that there is any appetite for cutting their hauling costs. As one trucker said, when they were making all sorts of money, and my fuel bill was going up month after month they weren’t there for me.

That attitude seems to be what you find from suppliers and truckers in the region, of course there also is a handful that would buckle under fearing that Canfor will take their business elsewhere if they don’t belly up to the bar.

That speaks volumes about how the company is viewed by the rank and file, those people who have toiled, as one person said, for the past 20 years , "Without so much as a thank you, and they now come calling asking for some of my pay check back?"

Under the terms of the release of the new wood, everyone ,including Abitibi, Dunkley and others will also get a crack at the bid. The result of releasing this wood is that the cost of getting the fibre to the mill will drop greatly and we now will see just how loyal Canfor is to the community of Mackenzie

I’m Meisner and that’s one man’s opinion.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Surprise everyone! Canfor is a large corporation with the scruples to match. Anyone who ever thought differently was fooling themselves and bathing in a sea of delusion.

Canfor is loyal only to money. It is the way of things in this world.
CANFOR SHOULD TAKE THEIR SAW AND GO HOME. LEAVE IT TO DUNKLEY , CARRIER , LAKELAND , AND OTHER MEDIUM/SMALL PRODUCERS IN THE AREA. THEY TRULY HAVE THEIR ROOTS IN THE COMMUNITY. CANFOR IS TRYING TO BREAK THE COMMUNITY IN TWO WAYS....
1. CLOSE SAWMILLS , REDUCE COSTS .

2. GRIND AND CHISSEL THE SUPPLIERS TO THE
POINT WHERE THERE IS NO PROFIT

I CHOOSE # 1 AND LET THE MEDIUM/SMALL PRODUCERS TAKE OVER..THINGS WOULD BE MUCH MORE STABLE.
The workers in Mackenzie have been asked not to take the 2% increase as of July 01, 2007 as part of the 5 year collective agreement in 2004.
The voting takes place Friday - July 13,I wonder if all the other CanFor mills (Steelworkers Union)were also asked?

What's going to be next? CanFor expects the workers to pay for medical, dental and Weekly indemnity etc....out on their own pockets?
I guess Canada is really becoming a nanny state. Now we expect our companies to keep us employed even if they lose money doing it.
RE: PROFIT

TO MOST OF US A LOSS IS IN THE NEGATIVE COLUMN..TO CANFOR IT IS NOT MEETING PROJECTED PROFIT. IE. MAKING $300.M INSTEAD OF PROJECTED $400.M.... THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE IN THE TWO SYSTEMS. CANFOR IS NOT IN THE NEGATIVE COLUMN.
Giterdun. You should take Lakeland off your list. I beleive that Canfor has a 1/3 interest in Lakeland.
It is all about moving raw logs for centralized milling with the sole focus on cost reduction efficiencies and has nothing to due with diversification, job growth, or building sustainable communities.

It's a policy driven by hedge funds and the money gamblers that use fake ill gotten security instruments to strip our country of our companies and then use these companies to strip our communities of our economic independence.

If raw logs from Vanderhoof were shipped all winter through Prince George to Mackenzie, than I see no reason why Canfor wouldn't turn around and do the reverse. Both locations are the same distance from their end user markets (Chicago), so shipping is really a none issue for the money crunchers.

Welcome to globalization and the money traders that globalization is designed to empower.
Profits = you mean the money they couldn't hide with write-offs and write downs ect...