Disciplinary Hearing for Slemko Wrong Move: One Man's Opinion
By Ben Meisner
Wednesday, July 18, 2007 03:45 AM

The most recent event coming out of the Bush inquest is from the Edmonton City Police who will put Const Joe Slemko in front of a disciplinary hearing over his testimony at the inquest.
Slemko, a blood spatter expert, testified the shooting did not take place in the manner that was described by RCMP Constable Paul Koester. Koester says he was on the bottom of a struggle between Bush and himself and, because Bush was choking him to death, feared for his life. Koester says he drew his pistol and somehow was able to reach around and fire a bullet into the back of Ian Bush's head.
Slemko said, No way, it was his belief that in fact the police officer was either on top or to the side of Bush when the fatal shot was fired.
Listening to Slemko on the stand it is plain to see he has a passion for his work. Moreover, he believes in the principal that it is important to tell the truth, regardless of the consequences.
Edmonton Supt Dwayne Gibbs says that since the Crown and Police are, "indivisible" in a prosecution, Slemko was in conflict when he gave evidence that disputed the Crown’s theory.
He also said Slemko must clear all outside work with the Edmonton Police force before undertaking it. No surprise, given the fact that the RCMP wrote a letter of complaint to the Edmonton Police because Slemko had provided evidence in the past that had resulted in murder charges being stayed.
We certainly don’t want testimony that might get at the truth in the issue getting in the way of how some police officers feel the incident went down, especially if it goes against what they believe took place.
Slemko was raked over the coals by the lawyer representing Koester at the inquest. There was more than a concerted effort to try and get Slemko dismissed as an expert witness and why, surely an inquest would want to know what actually took place?
An inquest cannot, I repeat, cannot, establish blame, and Supt Dwayne Gibbs should be aware of that. It is not a matter of a charge or conviction but rather how the event took place. The Crown, that at last breath was supposed to represent all of us, should be more than happy to search for the truth.
Somehow the truth and the ability to tell the truth are becoming lost in our society. It is we who pay for the, "Crown" the Police and those who represent them.
We also pay for the justice system , a system where each of us is supposed to have the right to stand before our accusers and receive a fair hearing . I say "supposed to" in Joe Slemko’s case the very fact that the charges have been made indicates that there is a law for them and a law for us.
By not wanting to hear an alternate version of what might have happened in the interview room that night in October, the police have verified the public's concern about police investigating police, that only aspects and avenues which support their theory will be explored.
That concern has been punctuated with an exclamation mark as Joe Slemko is now being disciplined for telling what he believes to be the truth.
His version may be right, it may be wrong, but it is his duty to share that version.
I’m Meisner and that’s one man’s opinion.
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home