Clear Full Forecast

Crime, The Environment, Tax Cuts, and Sovereignty Highlights of the Throne Speech

By 250 News

Tuesday, October 16, 2007 04:44 PM

The Speech from the Throne has been delivered and  the NDP and the Bloc Quebecois have indicated they will oppose it, leaving it  up to the Liberals to  decide if there will be a federal election. Gilles Duceppe says he will not support the Throne Speech based  on the  continued committment  to Armed Forces in Afghanistan  "We will have to see if the Liberals make an ammendment and  we may make an  ammendment to that, so we have to see what the Liberals will do."

The Liberal's, Stephane Dion, has been keeping quiet.  Experts say his party is not ready to fight an election, but Dion is said to be ready to make moves to defeat the Government on the basis of the Throne speech if it doesn’t contain what the Liberals want.  While some of the Liberal flock may be willing to share their thoughts on the Speech from the Throne this evening, Liberal Leader Stephane Dion is not expected to make his thoughts known until tomorrow.  Michael  Ignatieff says  the "Liberals are looking at a disppointing speech, a vague speech,  we need to spend the evening calmly, soberly reflecting."   He says  the government is walking away  from Kyoto, and there is no strategy to give Canadian  industry an advantage as the dollar  continues to climb.  Ignatieff says Stephane Dion will reply tomorrow in the House of Commons.

There are  political pundits who say the Prime Minister is ready to head to the polls and may  have put  a “poison pill” into the  Throne Speech to ensure the Liberals  have no choice  but to defeat the  government and force an election which Stephen  Harper is confident  he can win.

If an election is forced, it would most likely take place on Monday December 3rd, or Monday December 10th.

Here are the highlights of the speech:

Starting the speech were words for the Canadian forces, pledging respect for their work.

"The economy is strong, the government is clean the country is united.  Now is the time to continue building a better Canada"

Five   key areas will be the focus of the government

1. Sovereignty:   The north needs new attention, and new challenges from other shores.  The government will  forward a new strategy to  strengthen sovereignty,  protecting  environment,  new opportunities and  improve living  conditions for  First Nations and  Inuit, and will build a world class  Arctic research  station .  There will be arctic floor mapping, and new arctic patrol ships to defend our sovereignty.   This includes increased commitment to the Armed Forces and continued support for Veterans.  Canada is back as a credible player on the world stage.  While committed to being in Afghanistan until February of 2009, Parliament will be asked to approve having the Armed Forces stay in  Afghanistan  to train Afghan army and police  until 2011.

2. Legislation to limit federal spending power  for new shared cost programs in areas of provincial jurisdiction.  Remove barriers that slow trade between provinces.  Reintroduce important pieces of legislation including senate reform.

3. Economic leadership including a long term plan for long term tax relief including a one percent cut to the GST.   Key sectors, forestry, fisheries, manufacturing and tourism, are facing challenges.   The government will work towards assisting these sectors as they adjust.

4. Crime:  protect the right to safety and security.  Reintroduce legislation that tackles violent crime with measures on impaired driving age sexual consent, stricter bail conditions and mandatory prison terms for gun crimes.  Strengthen the youth criminal justice act, so youth are held accountable to their victims and communities.  Repeal the long gun registry.  More  police officers to  patrol the streets.

5.Environment:  Canada admits  it cannot  meet the Kyoto  commitment,  but will help lead the effort to  reduce  greenhouse gasses with a new environmental agreement that will reduce Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions by  60 -70% by 2050, and a 20% reduction by 2020.  The Government plans tougher environmental enforcement which will make polluters “accountable”.  This would include enforcement measures, to ensure food and toys  are  safe for  all Canadians.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Really, what would you expect from Stephane Dion? He is in a desperate situation. He doesn't really have too many options. He's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't support this budget. So, whatever?

The Block and the NDP are against everything the Conservatives are doing, so who really cares what they think anyway?

I say, carry on to Prime Minister Harper. Take your chances, push the envelope, make people make a decision. Things have never been better in 20 years. At least we are moving ahead and in a direction this government wants to go. Oh, by the way, they do have the support of a good percentage of the voters, why do you think they got elected in the first place? Time to put up or shut up. Chester
I agree Chester...I say force an election.
Voters in the West should still remember the the decade we were ignored. The West still wants in!!!
"Decade" more like decades
I think they need to call the damn election and end all the political manuvering and wasted time spent on each party beating the other one up!
What a bunch of crap!
Whether you support Stevie Harper and his gang or not,it would at least settle some issues!
Those overpaid do-nothings in Ottawa need a tune up to help them remember who they work for.
Every damn one of them!
An election would more than likely leave us in exactly the same Conservative minority sitution we're in. Complete waste of money + the irritation of Jack Layton spewing inane nonsense on the tube every night.
Jack Layton...hmmmm...good point!
Couldn't stand much of that!
There ARE some good ideas in the package and one of the best is repealling the long gun registry!
Long over due and a gross amount of money that could be better spent on actually fighting crime and related issues!
Just listening to some of the measures the government is wanting to enact re. crime.

Longer sentences, etc.

My question is "Wouldn't it be better to find the causes of crime?"

Longer sentences just produce more criminals, particularly if there are young children left without a parent.

I am not against punishment but I wonder about a dialogue on how crime comes about in the first place?

Poverty? Families that are without good family support?

Just wondering.