Clear Full Forecast

Invasion of the Moneylenders – Part 1 - “Debt is good”

By Peter Ewart

Tuesday, October 23, 2007 03:49 AM

     (This is the first in a series of articles on the banking and credit industry).

In 1956, a scary science fiction film was released called “Invasion of the Body Snatchers.”  Set in a fictional American town, the movie is about how individuals in a town are taken over, both mind and body, by alien “pod” creatures.  These creatures look and sound like ordinary human beings, but they are robotic in character and devoid of any emotion whatsoever.

Some interpreted the movie to be a warning about the dangers of communism; others saw it is a protest against the paranoia of the McCarthyite period.  Whatever the case, the movie was a hit and is now considered to be a classic of the science fiction genre.

Flash forward a half a century to 2007.  Have we, indeed, been invaded, not by “body snatchers” but by moneylenders?

Practically every pore of our society is hopelessly clogged with debt.  Governments at the federal, provincial, state and municipal levels in North America and many countries abroad are literally drowning in debt to the billions, and in the case of the U.S., trillions of dollars.

Despite the “booming economy,” many small and medium businesses are only a payment or two away from defaulting on debt payments and having their assets seized.  Even some big companies that are considered to be pillars of the economy are highly leveraged with debt and only a downturn in the economy away from creditor protection or collapse.

Consumer debt in the U.S. and many other industrial countries is off the chart, with many ordinary people juggling two, three or four credit card balances in desperate attempts to stay afloat.

We are swamped with so much debt that it appears as if we have passed over into some kind of alternate universe.  Forget about gold and silver; forget about dollars, euros and yen.  Debt has become the new 21st Century currency, and, at least until the latest “subprime mortgage” crisis in the U.S., has been shoveled off the back of trucks like manure.

In the 1980s, not a few people said that the slogan “Greed is good” best summed up the atmosphere on Wall Street.  Indeed, financier Ivan Boesky (who was later jailed for insider trading) made a famous speech at the University of California claiming as much, and Oliver Stone even made a film called “Wall Street” in which the central character, played by Michael Douglas, echoed Boesky’s speech.

Many would say that “greed is good” still applies today.  Others might argue, in summing up our swimming financial times, that the slogan should be “Debt is good.”  After all, President George W. Bush, on whose watch the U.S. has racked up the largest debt of any country in recorded history, claims - with that odd little smirk of his - that the American economy is “fundamentally strong.”  Dick Cheney, Bush’s vice-president (and some say the real power behind the “throne”) has gone so far as to claim that “deficits don’t matter.” 

Both Bush and Cheney, of course, would make for extremely scary figures in any science fiction film.  Or perhaps a rewrite of “Alice in Wonderland.”  In this alternate universe, negative numbers take on more weight than positive ones; subtraction becomes more important than addition; non-productive turns into productive; and central banks grow dollar bills as plentiful as autumn leaves on some genetically modified tree.

Today, there is no doubt.  The moneylender, that much reviled figure, at least in past centuries and previous civilizations, rules supreme.  “Hedge funds”, “derivatives”, “collateralized debt obligations”, “asset backed commercial paper”, and other recently spawned creatures of the modern financial world roam the economic seas, preying upon the “producing economy.”  

What these creatures don’t catch, banks, credit card companies, and mortgage companies scoop up with their wide drift nets.  As with the foreign factory ships off of the Grand Banks of Newfoundland, practically nothing escapes, whether individual, corporation or government.  If they do, they are looked upon as being odd, like some strange and bizarre species of fish hiding off somewhere in the deepest ocean waters. 

So who is making all the money?  And, even more important, where do we go from here?  Through the magic of compound interest, debt piles up day after day, year after year, decade after decade.  Is that how it works?  Do we just continue marching down the yellow brick road like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz?  Or is there a day of reckoning, like 1929, when it “all falls down”?

In this series of articles, we will look into some of these nagging issues. 

Next: “Invasion of the moneylenders – Part 2 – “Usury by any other name”.

Peter Ewart is a college instructor and writer based in Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.  He can be reached at: peter.ewart@shaw.ca

 


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

This is a subject of huge importance, probably the most important topic of our time... IMO it is so out of control that it could cause a collapse that could take two decades to repair. I think its all part of the zionist banksters plan.

IMO the rise of the banksters coincides with the rise in the privatization of government function. It all translates into a corporate government that is strangling all aspects of the real private economy and this is done by the elites that manage investment funds. We live in an age where 3/4 of our economy (including the banks)is owned by government entities (ie public pension funds, ICBC, BC Hydro, ect) and these funds generate 2/3'rds of government revenue (not through direct taxation) that is all off balance sheet. It's a situation where the banksters manage our government investments and in turn fund our governments representatives through donations from there management portfolio's, which then enables them to maniplulate the economy for their political and financial ends and needs.

Its a case of a hijacked government by bankster elite public servants that are building an empire through the liquidation of collapsed debt bubbles, which then allow the government owned equity funds as well as international banksters to swallow up all that was once freely owned by Canadian citizens directly in days of old.

IMO a partial solution would be self directed pension funds with a better voting rights structure that cuts out the banksters as the voting agent of invested capital. Make employee investments a recognized asset on the corporate balance sheets through depreciation schemes, and limit the inflation of currency to the labor compenent of the country in aggrigate and not the fake GDP numbers used to manipluate lending rates and currency valuations. Most importantly outlaw the use of hedge funds and derivative trading manipulations of the true economy.

Time Will Tell
A common thread in recent Canadian business stories is the banksters lend large sums of capital in the hundreds of millions and even for some companies in the billions through unsecured hyped up (by the secured lender) drive by bond offerings on the bond market bought up in most cases by government sourced capital funds.

The key is that all the funds from the bond sales goes to investments in hard infrastructure, so much goes into investment of infrastructure that the business model is unable to keep up and eventually the company defaults on its huge bond debt forcing Chapter 7 bankruptcy where the banksters acquire all the hard infrastructure for anywhere from 1-10 cents on the dollar via their secured claim on the secured debts. The banksters then use these assets under their own management to predatory price the remaining hold outs in the targeted sector of the economy forcing their eventual Chapter 7 because the hold outs are servicing a debt in the hundreds of millions if not billions and the bankster owned entities are operating with no debt.

In BC for example we had the BC Teachers Pension and ICBC among others that invested tens of millions toward the Vancouver based $7 Billion dollar 360 Networks global mesh fibre optic network, the most advanced in the world. 360 Networks paid for the build out through bond offerings. Chase Manhattan (Rockefellers) the banksters in this case were the secured creditors of $250 million and took full control of the company through Chapter 7 in BC Supreme Court at just the time when the network became operational. The new private company (no reporting obligations) gave the management 17% of the company for guiding it into their hands (nothing for the people that funded the network build out), and then proceeded to acquire the rest of the data transmission sector through predatory pricing as a result of a network they acquired for 5 cents on the dollar. The BC Supreme Court even allowed Chase Manhattan to acquire GT Telecom for $250 million cash (10 cents on the dollar of infrastructure build out cost) from cash 360 Networks had on hand prior to its discharge from bankruptcy court. That’s a company in bankruptcy court using cash that could have kept it solvent to purchase another company in a similar situation consolidating the assets for the secured creditor before the secured creditor is the legal owner (after discharge from bankruptcy court) of the bankrupt companies assets?

The new economy at work for you... or thievery through a system designed for the banksters and not investors nor actual business models....
I would like to borrow some money so I can get out of debt.
Borrow to buy a motor home? No problem
Borrow money to take a holiday in the tropics? No problem.
Borrow up to 75% of yer home equity? No problem.
Wanna start a business? Take a hike, bozo. We ain't venture capitalists. We have an obligation to our shareholders. Ain't life grand?
chader, if a bank is not run by jews, are they still part of your zionist bankster plan?
My Jewish pals from high school in the sixties are now lawyers. At least 12 or more. Should be retiring too soon, I might add. Like me.
The City of Prince George is a prime example of how you can get into some serious debt. Problem is the knaves who got us into this hole will be long gone before we ever dig ourselves out.

We dont have to look for World Conspiracies to see a major problem We need look no further than our own City Hall. Borrow, tax, and spend seems to be the motto. Hire as many people as you want, the best machinery money can buy, etc; money is no object. We can always tax and borrow more.

We will pay for this down the road. However by then it will be too late, but heh" we will be able to see the lights on Connaught Hill from satalite, so that a good thing. How do we get on the satelite?
Dow, I don't think it is a matter of Jewish bankers, but rather a matter of zionist banksters. That being zionism in the political sense with the objectives of a NWO based in Israel sheilded from international accountability for their bankster crimes of enriching themselves at the expense of the societies they plunder. Many non-Jews are zionists and they call themselves athiests or christian-zionists, evengelicals, or neo-cons, or communists, ect...

"if a bank is not run by jews, are they still part of your zionist bankster plan?"

Its not my plan, so you would have to ask the people involved. I would think any bank that participates in the fractional banking is in someway directly or indirectly participating. Some more than others. HSBC for example is the modern day banking (money laundering) interest for the British Empire holdouts, and at the other end of the spectrum you have local credit unions that I would think at best would not be part of any plan in a global sense.

The ones to keep an eye on are the British banksters in the 'City of London' financial centre run by the Rothchild's dynasty that manipulate central banks and thus the politics in those countries around the world over. This would include the the US Federal Reserve and its 'shareholder' bankster syndicate members. All of which are luciferian illuminati of the 'skulls and bones' variety bound by selfish buy in to a global conspiracy to enrich themselves at the expense of other peoples and nations.

All in my humble opinion of course.....
Any of us who has a credit card, home loan or car loan has to take responsibility for our own debt. If we didn't want to contribute to the lenders pockets, we would have saved up for the expenditures. Heck, let's add on my student loan that didn't actually purchase anything physical... I know knowledge is power, power is $, but you can only use the power of knowledge if someone will use your skills.