Clear Full Forecast

Report From Parliament's Hill: November 1st

By Prince George - Peace River M.P. Jay Hill

Tuesday, November 30, 1999 12:00 AM

    
Economic Statement Delivers “Massive” Tax Cuts for ALL

It’s been a half century since the federal tax burden on Canadians has been this low. 

Thanks to Conservative Finance Minister Jim Flaherty’s Economic Statement this week, each and every Canadian will benefit significantly from an additional $60-billion in tax cuts.  That brings the total overall tax relief for Canadians and businesses, since our Conservative Government came to office 21 months ago, to $190-BILLION!

We’ve kept our promise to cut the GST to 5%.  The new rate will take effect this coming January 2008.  A GST cut benefits everyone of all incomes, including those whose incomes are so low they don’t benefit when income taxes are cut.  That’s why I find it perplexing that the opposition parties, especially the socialist NDP, remain opposed to a GST cut.  What’s more, the GST credit will be maintained at its current level, meaning even higher benefits for low income Canadians. 

A family purchasing a new $300,000 home will save $3,840 thanks to our cuts to the GST.  A family spending $30,000 on a new minivan will save $600 in GST.

You’ll notice the benefit of our other tax cuts as soon as you fill out your 2007 income tax return.  That’s because our increase to the basic personal amount to $9,600 is RETROACTIVE to January 1, 2007.  There will be a further increase to $10,100 on January 1, 2009.  The lowest personal income tax rate has been reduced to 15% also RETROACTIVE to January 1, 2007. 

That’s a tax savings of $180 for a family earning $15,000 to $30,000 per year and $400 less tax for a family earning between $45,000 and $60,000.

Canadian businesses continue to flourish under the economic environment our Conservative Government has fostered.  As a result, Canada’s unemployment rate is at its lowest in 33 years.  To build upon this success and enhance the competitiveness of Canadian industry and business, we’ve cut the small business income tax rate to 11% in 2008 – ONE YEAR EARLIER than previously scheduled.  The general corporate income tax rate will be reduced to 15% by 2012 starting with a 1-percentage point reduction in 2008 BEYOND the already scheduled reductions.

And because the cornerstone of our agenda for Canada’s economic growth is debt reduction, our Government has also announced an additional payment of $10-billion against the nation’s debt.  That brings the total debt relief under our Conservative Government to $37-billion or $1,570 for each man, woman and child in the country!

In turn, that additional debt reduction means even more tax relief for you under our Tax Back Guarantee.

This Economic Statement means the take home pay for all Canadians will go up.  Canadian businesses, from your local coffee shop to large corporations, will have more flexibility to create even more jobs and make further investment in their operations.

As I write this, the House of Commons is scheduled to vote in just a few hours on enshrining these economic measures into law.  I don’t believe there is any MP who can justify to his or her constituents why they would vote against such sound fiscal management.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

But just think, since people with lots of money spend more they will benefit most from the GST cut - buy a car save a fortune. Poverty stricken Canadians, on the other hand, will benefit barely at all - buy a scarf to keep yourself warm save 10 cents.

How much more could have been accomplished if the money to be given back had been used to increase the personal income tax exemption more, or reduced the lowest tax rate to 14% so that those same poverty stricken Canadians could benefit from the wealth of our country as well as the rich ones do.
Amen Ammonra. I would support an INCREASE in the GST that would eliminate personal income tax or at least raise the basic personal exemption to, say, $30,000 with an index of that to inflation for the future. Oh, and I am not a low-income earner.
"...since our Conservative Government came to office 21 months ago,.."

...taking over from a Liberal government which had already eliminated deficit spending and worked to have seven consecutive surplus budgets including some payments towards retiring the national debt!

Thank goodness the Liberals were not engaged in fiscal policies similar to those inflicted on us by the Conservative government of Brian Mulroney, who regularly added annual deficits of 30 to 60 billion dollars to our national debt, after telling us that his introduction of the GST (!) would ELIMINATE deficit spending!

How pitifully soon people forget what really happened - including the fact that the GST was neither revenue neutral nor a deficit eliminating tool!

Fool me once...fool me twice...
ammonra, tax cuts will always favour the wealthy, they pay all the freakin taxes. The gst is completely regresive. A $100,000 earner pays the same gst as a welfare recipient on a laundry detergent.
If I buy a hummer even with the gst cut i'm paying a wack of tax. The fact the poor don't buy hummers therefor this tax cut is bad.....well..i'm sure I won't change your mind.
they also increased the basic excemption which will certainly help the working poor. You can't please everyone so they did a bit on everything. Bottom line is the total tax take is down which will help everyone. I find the GST debate interesting. In my mind if I save $1000 via income taxes or gst is irelivant to me. its money in my jeans.
Diplomat....the mulroney years were 15 years ago. The gst DID help eliminate the debt. They just weren't in power to take the credit. Once again I ask you the question, what did the Liberals do, other than cut provincial tranfers and sit on the cash cow called the gst to balance the federal budget. I'm waiting.....
sorry, I forgot one more Liberal budget balancing mechanisim. Completely gutting the military.
".....the wealthy, they pay all the freakin taxes."

The wealthy may pay the taxes to the taxman, but the poor pay the money to the wealthy so that they can pay the taxes.

One of the more obvious for instances ....

The wealthy person owns a small apartment building or even just one condo unit which she rents out. She pays property tax for instance. The renter, or so called poor person, pays no property tax. However, calculated into the rent is the property tax the owner has to pay. The owner hardly gives that as a gift to the renter. Therefore, in effect, the renter pays the property tax as an indirect “hidden” tax.

The question of who PROPORTIONATELY pays the most taxes, and how much of an actual difference there is, is a much more complex one to answer than simply looking at the direct payers of the taxes.
"Diplomat....the mulroney years were 15 years ago. "

But the portion of the national debt (piled up by mulroney (just love the small *m* that you use!) has to be paid off by us now!

"The gst DID help eliminate the debt." Not during the years of stretch-the-truth brian.

Too bad the Liberals did not gut the military budget even more so Canada must stick to a policy of simply helping others with foreign aid comprised of advisers, teachers, food shipments, medical aid, etc.
and refrain from blowing away foreigners in far away lands, including their women and children.

I see the Conservatives are now stonewalling attempts to recover the millions of taxpayers' money paid to mulroney in the Airbus lawsuit when he did not deserve one cent.

It's beginning to smell like a *culture of corruption.*

Thanks to the CBC's Fifth Estate we are now learning the sordid details.
Diplomat...what about the trudea era(like the small t?)John Turner as finance minister was the FIRST(like the capitals?)
to exploit deficit financing and exploit it they did. Buy the time brian was PM we had a massive debt.this coupled with record high interest rates was part of the reason mulroney struggled to finance the country.

your take on the military would assume we would go forth in a world of peace and harmony, nice thought, but totally iresponsible for a sovergn nation. Would you ship medical supplies to the Taliban to help the people of Afganistan?

If you don't like the mulrony settlement in the airbus inquiry....take it up with the judge and the rcmp who failed miserably to prove their case.

"thanks to the cbc" good grief..what else would you expect from these biased liberal taxpayer sucking clowns.
dow7500...you are right about Trudeau amassing a massive debt! But what you are forgetting to mention is that Mulroney ran on an explicit platform of NO MORE deficit spending, balanced budgets, etc, etc.

Of course, he did not keep his promises and on the contrary, did the exact opposite!

That is a fact, and no amount of comparison with others who also did not do what they promised will make it disappear.

Of course, if enough citizens prefer to have lying politicians, then there is absolutely no problem, now is there???

dow7500: "Would you ship medical supplies to the Taliban to help the people of Afghanistan?"

By statements like the one above you are diminishing the value of the other points you are trying to make in your comments, in my opinion.

Childish, really.

dow7500: "If you don't like the Mulroney settlement in the airbus inquiry....take it up with the judge and the rcmp who failed miserably to prove their case."

Had the RCMP had the evidence that just surfaced NOW - the courts would have ruled against paying out millions of our taxpayers' dollars.

I expect the present government to investigate the Mulroney - Schreiber affair taking the latest information into account and sue for the return of every single dollar.

And so should you, Madam/Sir!





"dow7500: "Would you ship medical supplies to the Taliban to help the people of Afghanistan?"

By statements like the one above you are diminishing the value of the other points you are trying to make in your comments, in my opinion.
please elaborate, seems like a strait forward question, with no answere.
dow7500: "Would you ship medical supplies to the Taliban to help the people of Afghanistan?"





dow7500: "Would you ship medical supplies to the Taliban to help the people of Afghanistan?"

"By statements like the one above you are diminishing the value of the other points you are trying to make in your comments, in my opinion."

Sorry, bad paste on the last post.

The question still remains, diplomat.
Would you?


How would I be helping the people of Afghanistan by shipping medical supplies to the Taliban?

Mind you, close to 80% of the Afghan people are in favour of negotiating with the Taliban to find some political accommodation, common ground and peace.

Perhaps if we allow the Afghan people to sort out their own problems any medical supplies and aid we ship to them would go to all of them, Taliban included?
"close to 80% of the Afghan people are in favour of negotiating with the Taliban".

where did you pull that number from? the cbc?...then it must be true. You are aware of how this group operates don't you? They are likely the most brutal back assed regime on the planet today. They cut off womens heads for going to school. We could and likely would have left them in their world if they hadn't of harboured and encouraged the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

you might want to focus on the way the world IS, not how we imagine it.
Mr. Karzai himself said so - he wants to negotiate with the Taliban and he wants the foreign powers to stop killing Afghan civilians! Perhaps you should inform yourself a bit better and face reality as IS.

Obviously you cast doubt on the CBC only because the CBC uncovered troubling facts about a past Conservative Prime Minister.

I am for peace and you are for war. Be happy because Canada is at war, again.