Clear Full Forecast

Police Complaints Commissioner Launches New Probe on Police Investigating Police

By 250 News

Thursday, November 29, 2007 10:00 AM

The  death of Ian Bush,  has not only rocked  the community of Houston B.C., but the Chair of the Commission for Public COmplaints, Paul Kenney says it had an effect in B.C. and in the Entire counttry.  Kennedy says  the public confidence in the RCMP has been  shaken and the public has concerns about the   "police investigate police " so he is launching another probe.

Kennedy has initiated a complaint into the conduct of those unidentified RCMP members who have conducted criminal investigations into the activities of other RCMP members, in cases that involved serious injury or death, which have taken place anywhere in Canada between April 1, 2002 and March 31, 2007.

Various members of the public and the media have expressed concern about the propriety of RCMP members investigating other RCMP members, especially in cases of this nature.

Accordingly, pursuant to subsection 45.37(1) of the RCMP Act, Mr. Kennedy is initiating a complaint into the conduct of the RCMP members involved in such investigations during the time period shown above, specifically:

  • whether the RCMP members involved in these investigations conducted the investigations free of actual or perceived conflict of interest, whether they responded appropriately and proportionately to the gravity of the incident, whether they responded in a timely fashion and whether their conduct adhered to the standards set out in section 37 of the RCMP Act;
  • whether these same RCMP members complied with all appropriate policies, procedures, guidelines and statutory requirements for such investigations; and
  • whether existing RCMP policies, procedures and guidelines are adequate to ensure that fair, effective, thorough and impartial investigations are carried out by RCMP members when investigating fellow RCMP members.

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

If ever there was a case where something stinks,it is the Ian Bush case.
The time lag before Koester answered any questions about the circumstances relating to incident is absurd!
And so was his conduct on the witness stand at the inquest, by refusing to re-inact the shooting!
But he got away with it, and he is still a cop.
Contrary to popular belief,there ARE bad cops, and cops who crack and panic under stressful situations, just like any other profession.
Some are good at it,and some aren't.
Then there was the Vanderhoof shooting.
2 cops and a civilian,one cop say's the one who did the actual shooting isn't telling it like it happened, and so does the civilian who was there as well.
But the RCMP ignore that???
I just guess they HAVE take this further,but I still think it will get swept away!
And it won't be the first time either!
The RCMP DO cover their own dirt, so we shouldn't be suprised when nothing comes of this.
http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/story.html?id=763cced3-ac37-4d7d-87a4-7a2fcf60640e

Wait until you read this Andy!

Vancouver police threatened Constable/Blood Spatter Expert Joe Slemko.

What is going on in Vancouver? It's about time their dirt got exposed!
You call that an excellent letter, heidi?
What a joke! Your'e just part of all the hype. I would hope that anyone who reads that letter in the Citizen also reads the responses to her letter at the bottom of the article for more balanced views.

You know what? Anyone who is in trouble or needs help..why don't you just call a reporter instead of the police?
No actually I thought we should all move to Edmonton where we can call Constable Slemko for help.
Imorg I think twice before calling the police. I think it was a great letter myself. Hey at one time the police had standards but those have seem to gone Hollywood.
Ya right a new probe. Kenney didn't do the first one any justice.
Guess what Heidi? A number of EPD are ex rcmp who decided to stay in alberta and not transfer out....In most cases, the requirements for hiring in the EPD and other municipal forces are waived should an rcmp member wish to join them.

Having said that, I'm sure Mr. Slemko is quite capable and professional out in the street when doing his job, but don't think he won't follow the same use of force principals that you think are excessive if he is forced to make a split second decision out there. It is not a sugar coated world out there and you should know that by now with what you have been through.
Interesting fact: in Poland, prosecutors direct major police investigations. They can't do it here (what you see on that trash-tv show, "Shark" is pure BS). Chief investigator of the Robert D atrocity, is Michal Szuiczynski of Gliwice, Poland. I am going to send him a fax to inform him of serial case-fixing by the judicial-prosecutorial-policial tandem that has usurped the rule of law in BC.

Prokurator Michał Szułczyński
tel.(032) 78-09-182
fax (032) 78-09-199
kom. 693-425-424

RCMP slugs ignored Public Complaints Commission findings on taser use:
http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/DefaultSite/Case_Summaries/index_e.aspx?ArticleID=490

Why are RCMP slugs going to waste taxpayer funds, to study Robert D's Polish background? They want to smear him, so that they can peddle their proportionate force fiction. That is only sellable to infantile adults who were bullied as youths, and seek protection as adults by allying with thugs and gangsters in uniform.

See Alberta case where judge tossed a case after learning that a cop threatened use of a taser, outside of any present law enforcement purpose and then covered up punitive use of same.

http://www2.albertacourts.ab.ca/jdb/2003-/pc/criminal/2006/2006abpc0216.pdf

[67] Hudec’s failure to record in his notes both the strip search and the Tasering of J.W., his failure to file the requisite “use of force” form and his failure to take J.W. to see a doctor following the Tasering, are strongly suggestive of the fact that Hudec used his Taser outside of standard police procedures. Hudec did not want to have to explain his use of this prohibited weapon. He wanted this incident buried and forgotten.

[68] I do not believe Hudec’s evidence about what occurred during the strip search. J.W.’s evidence is more compelling. I believe J.W. did comply with Hudec’s request that he remove his clothing and spread his cheeks during the strip search. I believe that Hudec was looking for an excuse to use his Taser and that J.W. did not offer any reason for the use of that Taser during the strip search.

[69] J.W. was Tasered after he was fully clothed and at a time when J.W. was completely compliant with Hudec. Hudec had warned the young man earlier in the car that he was going to Taser him and he did so as the youth was about to leave the strip search room.

[70] Based upon all the evidence, I believe that Hudec wanted to teach this young man a lesson. He wanted to punish this young man by inflicting on him excruciating pain because J.W. committed a break and enter the day before Christmas and because he lied to police about having weapons.
---------------------
In spite of their slavish defence of excessive force and false arrest by our under worked and over paid blue slugs, the donut dunkers still refer to their doormats as: "goofs." Why be a goof?

I feel so sorry for the families involved.
I wonder though if any answer would satisfy fully?
I can only hope that some sort of peace will surround all the families involved, soon.
Truth is attempting to paint all instances of taser deployment from one case. Watch out for "truth"...his perception is not reality.