Clear Full Forecast

Pulp and Paper Industry Needs Renewal Strategy

By 250 News

Friday, January 11, 2008 03:53 AM

 A new report released by the B.C. Pulp and Paper Task Force warns that B.C.’s pulp and paper industry is falling behind its competitors in other regions and requires strategic reinvestments and sound public policy if it is to be renewed.

The task force, which includes representatives from all 20 pulp and paper mills in B.C., commissioned Poyry Forest Industry Consulting to conduct an assessment of the industry’s competitive position and its future economic prospects.

The Poyry report found the industry’s major challenges include increased global competition, growing concerns about fibre availability and affordability — particularly with the pine beetle epidemic — and rising pressures from the strong Canadian dollar.

“The pulp and paper sector has suffered from poor returns on investment for a prolonged period of time due to poor market conditions,” said David Gandossi, chair of the B.C. Pulp and Paper Task Force. “The result is that the industry has not made the kinds of capital investments required for a sustainable industry; clearly, this has to change.”

According to the report, due to poor market conditions, capital assets in B.C.’s pulp and paper sector are older than in competing jurisdictions and the reinvestment rate is below the level required to sustain their already weak competitive position. In addition, the industry has achieved only a four per cent return on capital employed over the past 15 years, which is far below the minimum 12 per cent return expected for a healthy industry.

On the positive side, B.C.’s pulp and paper sector is well established, it has experienced personnel and global markets continue to offer significant opportunity for companies in B.C. In addition, the industry benefits from a large and high quality fibre basket that can continue to supply a viable pulp and paper sector; particularly if policies are developed that enable the pulp and paper industry to benefit from opportunities in the growing demand for biomass-based energy.

 “Competing jurisdictions have transitioned to a green economy by developing new policies that recognize pulp and paper operations for their renewable electricity, carbon credits, liquid bio-fuels and green specialty chemicals,” said Gandossi. “Government policies in these jurisdictions recognized pulp and paper for its green economy strengths, which resulted in significant industry reinvestment.”

According to the Poyry report, significant capital investments in B.C.’s pulp and paper sector can be encouraged by:

  • developing and supporting energy policies that provide revenue incentives for biomass-based energy produced by the pulp and paper sector;
  • establishing a tax structure—particularly municipal property tax rates—that is more in line with competing jurisdictions;
  • supporting employee training and development at all levels, including apprenticeships, technical training, and management training; and
  • funding research that encourages knowledge-creation and innovation, while supporting  the sawmill sector in making the transition to post-pine beetle forest conditions.

The report is the second in a series of competitiveness studies conducted for the Task Force.

Last month, an economic impact study conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP found that B.C.’s pulp and paper industry contributes $4 billion in economic benefits to B.C. and provides jobs for 30,000 British Columbians. The PwC report also found that, since 1990, the industry has reduced its greenhouse gas emissions by 62 per cent, which is equivalent to removing 600,000 vehicles from our roads.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Pulp is the only thing they are making money on right now. We should be feeding these mills dry, red trees around the clock right now.
We're trying to.
But for how long would they still be 'making money' if we did just that?

Lets look at what the Report above ISN'T telling us:-

~developing and supporting energy policies that provide revenue incentives for biomass-based energy produced by the pulp and paper sector;

We get to pay higher electric bills. (Without any increase in incomes.)

~establishing a tax structure—particularly municipal property tax rates—that is more in line with competing jurisdictions;

We get to pick up the property tax tab personally for that portion of property tax relief afforded the industry. (Without any increase in incomes.)

~supporting employee training and development at all levels, including apprenticeships, technical training, and management training;

We get to fund training and development to ensure there will always be a pool of unemployed trained workers to draw from to keep labor costs for the pulp mill down. (Without any increase in incomes.)


~funding research that encourages knowledge-creation and innovation, while supporting the sawmill sector in making the transition to post-pine beetle forest conditions.

We get to fund the training of researchers whose research will tell us it's too costly to make anything here, we're not 'globally competitive'. Either we work for lower incomes and reduce our living standards below those of our lowest Third World competitor or we're done for. None of us will have 'jobs'. But hey, if they've already removed all our incomes to pay for all the things above, will we really still care?
"The task force, which includes representatives from all 20 pulp and paper mills in B.C., commissioned Poyry Forest Industry Consulting to conduct an assessment of the industry’s competitive position "

Good lord ... industry hiring a consultant ... what a dumb ass thing to do!!!!

;-)
“The pulp and paper sector has suffered from poor returns on investment for a prolonged period of time due to poor market conditions,” said David Gandossi, chair of the B.C. Pulp and Paper Task Force. “The result is that the industry has not made the kinds of capital investments required for a sustainable industry; clearly, this has to change.”
-----------------------
And the reason is????

They did not have a sustainability plan ... a staying-in-business plan ...

such a plan would have to include the anticipation of poor market conditions ... the continuing monitoring of the marketplacve and the competitive environment, including product changes ....

So, in the final analysis, they have not been taking care of business as they should.
The BANKSTERS are coming. I can smell it.

;-)
"The Poyry report found the industry’s major challenges include

1. increased global competition,

2. growing concerns about fibre availability and affordability — particularly with the pine beetle epidemic — and

3. rising pressures from the strong Canadian dollar."

These people have their ears to the ground ... they are right in there, well connected ... the inside scoop, and all that...

;-)

At a pulp & paper conference a couple of years ago an industry expert stated that in the coming years pulp prices would be high and the industry should take some of the money to invest in R&D and upgrade to modern and efficient equipment. This should help them stay competitive in the bad times. (highly productive and efficient scandinavian mills recover much more value from their process)
So what do we do?
Spin the mills into a "pulp trust". Distribute the profits to unit holders, run equipment to failure, and probably beg for assistance when times get tough.

Indeed, we should push for power generation using biomass. We've got tons of wood rotting in the bush, and next to nuclear wood gives the most bang for your buck.

As far as training too many skilled workers, ain't gonna happen. We can't fill the vacancies we have now, and it's only going to get worse. At least the pulp industry pays for apprenticeships. The oil and gas industry lays off their apprentices at school time and you and I pay their EI while they go to school (we all know the big oil companies can't afford to school employees)
Rising pressure from the strong Canadian dollar? Can't seem to recollect Yanks whining about the state of their dollar anytime.