Clear Full Forecast

Call For Action To Save Stuart Sockeye

By 250 News

Wednesday, February 20, 2008 12:47 PM

  

Prince George, B.C. -  "S.O.S."   has a new meaning  to the  Upper Fraser  Fisheries Conservation Alliance, it now stands for Save Our Sockeye.

The Stuart area sockeye run is a disaster, “We may be witnessing the extinction of a species, this cannot be ignored” says Marcel Shepert, Executive Director of the Upper Fraser Fisheries Conservation Alliance.

Shepert made the comment as the UFFCA released a report on the status of the early and late Sturart Sockeye runs.

The number of sockeye entering the Stuart system has declined substantially from the numbers recorded in the early 90’s. Comparing the same cycles of fish ( some years are dominant) last year, only 5,000 fish made it back to the Stuart area to spawn.

  • 1993 the population of spawning sockeye in the Stuart system for early run 700,000
  • 2005 the population of spawning sockeye in the Stuart system for early run had dropped to 100,000

For the Late Stuart Run, the numbers are even more staggering:

  • 1993, there were 1.8 million spawning sockeye returned to Stuart system
  • 2005, that number had already dropped to 300,000.

The prediction this year for the number of sockeye to enter the Fraser to head to the spawning grounds is 35,000 . That would be the number counted at Mission, and fish biologist David Levy doubts the number will be that high.

There are a number of reasons why the runs have dwindle to the near extinction levels. According to David Levy

Migration conditions and in river mortality are listed as the most likely reasons for the declining fish stocks.

Those migration conditions are a reference to high river flows an warm water temperatures. The early Stuart run faces high river flows and getting through Hell’s Gate is particularly difficult. As for increased water temperatures, well, there’s been a lot of talk about the need for a cold water release as a method of keeping the Nechako cool enough for salmon migration. David Levy says a cold water release won’t make any difference “I don’t believe it would help. The main reason is you’re using a smaller volume of very cold water to cool down the Nechako. By the time the water reaches the Nechako-Stuart confluence, there is very little detectable influence of that cold water release. Certainly you could never get cooler temperatures in Prince George, there just isn’t enough water.”

Levy’s report outlines five recommendations:

  1. Maintain closure of fishing on early sockeye
  2. Initiate a Stuart sockeye recovery program
  3. Fertilize Takla Lake in 2010 to provide more nutrients
  4. Form arrangements and agreements to import food fish to affected communities
  5. List early and late Stuart sockeye as endangered population

None of the people involved in the study, (which is available at www.uffca.ca ) could say how much money would be needed to affect change and bring the Stuart sockeye back to the former numbers.

Marcel Shepert says the Stuart run is culturally linked to the Northern First Nations, “I believe that when you cease to fish, you cease to be Native in my opinion”. Shepert is calling for action “The time for talk is over , we need to actually get in there and do the science needed to understand what’s going on in that particular eco system.”

  
Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

What about the native fishery on the lower Fraser? Why don't these bureaucrates tell it the way it is? The government seems powerless when it comes to dealing with the native industry down south. They close the commercial fishery at times to every one, but first nations keeps on fishing, making a mockery of the law. Will the people of B.C. every be governed by one law. Enough of this special treatment.
Well I guess another year of people fishing should just about fix the problem.... next year we won't have fish to worry about
Where's John Wayne when you need him.
Go under the Agassiz Rosedale bridge at 3 am.....the native people are pulling boat loads after boat load of fish from the river....go there at 9 am when the fisheres show up...a few native people yalling around telling them the fishing is not good...and they need more openings...
Have seen it personnaly...
qwaszxter, you are wrong. 'native indian only' fishing itself is a racist act, and don't twist that one around. Let the past be, we have to deal with today. Recognizing native indian 'rights' is fine, but when the future of a fishery is at stake, all the sustenance and ritual Bull---t has to go out the window. It's about the fish, not who was here first.
Let us help the government (they sure need help) to see this issue for what it is, a crisis that will affect all of us in time.
Sacrifice a few seasons of native fishing, and maybe that will prove to be one of the components needed to get the sockeye population/returns back to healthy levels.
Thank you.
metalman.
No fishing...for anyone,white OR native.
These fish are far more important than native cultural issues.
And nobody gets all the marbles,sometimes we ALL have to bite the bullet for something as important as this!
If that can't be done,then no whining when they are gone for good.
Bite the bullet? How about biting into a fish flavoured tofu stick instead. How's that fer a choice down the road?
mmm.. tasty!
I've watched native fishermen dumping piles of Sockeye out of the back of a pickup onto the river bank on the lower Fraser. Someone said they were all males and the natives toss them and keep the females because of the roe. Now thats conservation.
The Sockeye fishery and any fishery that could intercept any Sockeye at any time needs to be closed for everyone before it's to late. Allthough I think it is already to late.
One people, one land, one law.
Government sanctioned racism needs to end.
Shut the ENTIRE fishery (sport, commercial and food) down for 3-5 years and let the stocks come back. Anything less is purely irresponsible.
The truth is that the species will continue to decline because we humans don't want to do what it takes to save these runs... not to mention the rest of the planet. We worship money and to serve this God that we have placed on high everything must die, every animal, every tree, even others of our own species. Money worship must be served by performing death on a planetary scale, just like the Maya ripped the living hearts out of their victims. Everywhere there is the lust for money death follows.

The blame game is just a tired, pointless attempt to shift the blame off ourselves onto the "bad people" so we can feel guilt free. The truth is that everyone is to blame, the trawlers off shore that scoop up every living thing in sight, the people clear cutting every tree in sight, the run off from chemicals of every kind, the poachers that ignore the laws... the list is long. The bottom line is that humans are killing their own planet and they are so imature they can't swallow their sinful pride and admit truth that has become as plain as the nose on their face. "It's not my fault.." Give it a rest already!!

If we continue to live in the exact same way that cancer cells live we will die as they do... when they kill their host.
Lostfaith, You say it so well!
NMG probably has the best idea.
kevin1006; a little harsh, but for the most part I agree with what you say.
Hey, sorry for analysing, just an opinion, don't you know.
metalman.
Kevin can you take us for a ride in your space ship? We want to see how you do things on your planet.

-I agree to shut the whole fishery down and let it replenish. While it is shut down it would be a good time to gather data to see if people are actually the main problem of its decline or it could be a cycle like the pine beetle for example.
I agree with closing this fishery right down for 3 years.
A tough measure,but likely the only thing that has a hope of working.