Clear Full Forecast

Report From Parliament's Hill - February 21, 2008

By Prince George - Peace River M.P. Jay Hill

Thursday, February 21, 2008 03:44 AM

Liberal Debate Over Election Timing Overshadows Importance of Budget

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty’s federal Budget 2008 will be tabled next week.  Yet Liberal leader Stéphane Dion and the rest of his caucus are already in the midst of intense deliberations on whether they’ll vote against the budget, thereby triggering the fall of our Conservative minority government and sending Canadians to the polls.

Not that we needed more evidence that the Liberals are putting their own political future ahead of the best interests of the nation.  They’re far more interested in whether it will be politically-advantageous for them to align themselves with the socialists and the separatists in Parliament and face voters this Spring, than what’s actually in the budget.

No doubt my comments will draw comparisons to the Conservative Party abstaining from the vote on Paul Martin’s budget in April 2005, only to defeat his minority government later that year.

However, before we took the drastic and costly step of triggering an election back then, Canadians first deserved to hear the results of Justice Gomery’s probe into the Sponsorship Scandal.  And later that year, with his confirmation that some of the millions of dollars that were stolen from taxpayers ended up with the Quebec wing of the Liberal Party of Canada, Canadians had completely lost confidence in the scandal-ridden Liberals’ ability to manage their tax dollars.  It was time to go to the polls.

Right now, Canadians are content with our Conservative Government’s management of the nation’s finances.  Canada’s debt burden is at its lowest since the 1970s.  The payments we’ve made against the national debt are equivalent to $1,570 for every man, woman and child in Canada!

Tax Freedom Day now comes earlier, and the after-inflation, after-tax income of real families is on the rise.  In fact, the total tax burden of Canadians is at its lowest level in nearly 50 years!

Hopefully, if you’ve got a head-start on filing your income tax form, you’ve already noticed the hundreds of dollars you’ll save on your 2007 tax bill thanks to a number of targeted new tax credits and retroactive broad-based tax cuts that our government implemented.  Then there’s the two percent GST cut which benefits everyone, including low-income Canadians.

On top of that, our Conservative Government has addressed the long-standing fiscal imbalance so that the provinces have more money for healthcare and education.  And, through our Building Canada Plan, we’ve made the largest investment in infrastructure since the Second World War!

Meanwhile, Mr. Dion’s has been busy making countless ‘pie-in-the-sky’, electioneering-style spending commitments that will plunge Canada at least $62.5-BILLION deeper into debt.   And that amount represents the cost of only 86 of his major commitments because he hasn’t even put a price tag on 33 more! 

In our first two budgets and in our October 2007 financial statement, our Conservative Government demonstrated to Canadians that their faith in our ability to manage their tax dollars is well-placed.  This balanced, prudent approach to governing will continue with Budget 2008 and I look forward to reporting back to you on its details next week.

    
Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

I get kind of ticked off when I here politicians talking about taxes and how I should feel fortunate. I see reductions in consumption taxes and corporate taxes at a time when taxes on income are intolerable and I think it is simply unacceptable when I see the wasteful spending that is enabled by the taxation of income.

Income taxation is a blackmail theft of my labour that makes me no less then a slave of bureaucracy for my attempts to earn an income and redistribute that income (paying taxes in the process) as my budget allows and I see fit. The government has no right to reallocate the fruits of my labour or my savings in any form. I don't like being a slave and I don't like being told we should be fortunate to be less of a slave today then the day before... when clearly every voting citizen agrees income slavery should be abolished and stigmatized the way other past forms of slavery have been.

That said if you want to tax resource exports I am all fine with that. I can even tell you how I would like those tax dollars spent. One of the things I would do is as part of the only 2010 Olympic spending I would support... it would be nice to help fund the Afghans to train some future Olympians for the 2010 winter Olympics (bobsledding or cross country skiing?) so that they can have some hero's to look up to... and maybe in the process accomplish the mission over there with some cost effective dollars spent here... maybe even in PG redistributing our taxes in our town?
hear here hear....
Also you will notice the glee that politicians will report the newest deduction you are 'entitled' to, or the tax credit you can have, or all these other complex things you can write down if you are aware of one of the many thousands of pages of ways not to be as much of a income tax slave.

Its all the more reason why they will not remove the slave tax, otherwise they will find it harder to buy votes through manipulation of the income (slave) tax depending on your slave status.
"and the after-inflation, after-tax income of real families is on the rise"

I don't understand this statement. It makes no sense when house prices have doubled, in the last couple of years, gas is at $1.20 a litre and soon to go past $1.5o a litre... up at least double in a few years and those two things alone add up to a lot of inflation that has to factor in somewhere. I know most peoples wages haven't doubled in the last few years so it would seem the numbers must lie?
I have NO issues with taxes in general for the most part.
I do however have have an issue with how these polticial oppprtunists waste those same taxes while riding on the gravy train!
Not a brain among them!
This is not a report but a rant. he attacks the Fed. Liberals for something that has not yet happened. It is time he actually did report to us what happen. Opinion250 should also give equal space to the Fed. Liberals and the Fed. NDP. The only thing Hill did was kick an MP out of caucus after the Fed Cons said they wouldn't.
Hill conveniently forgets to mention the indisputable fact that the Liberals under Chretien and then Finance Minister Paul Martin eliminated deficit spending, managed finances so well that Canada was the only G8 country that had a balanced budget and surpluses for more then 7 years in a row.
Those were tough belt-tightening years for all of us - I remember it well.

When Harper took over he inherited all those benefits and a country flush with surpluses and money to throw at anything he wished to!

Now, there are fears that under the *able* Harper administration the country will slip back into the old Mulroney style super deficits again.

The ranting that comes with this Report is just that - a rant. Bluster and hot air.

That's my opinion, based on facts.
Hmm...yes it does seem that Mr Hill uses this as a political forum....NEWS FLASH...That's what this contribution space is guys!!! lol

But I do agree with one thing, I am still waiting for an answer to my comment posted weeks ago. Politicians in general don't seem willing to give answers, concrete info, and let us "in" as to what is really going on.

Taxes are what pays for our greater good such as health care, roads, land use management..etc. So, I don't have issue with the Feds in that regard. My tax issues lie squarely on the provinces! BC has taken any federal gains I may have had.