Clear Full Forecast

Performing Arts Centre Study Detailed

By 250 News

Monday, March 31, 2008 10:45 PM

Prince  George, B.C. – The feasibility study for a performing arts centre has been completed and  author Duncan Webb has  presented  several recommendations that support the construction of  such a facility.

Develop the following facilities in one or more locations:

  • 600 -800 seat multi purpose venue for touring shows and community groups
  • 200 -300 seat studio theater or recital hall
  • Visual arts studios and galleries,
  • Space for programs and teaching
  • Support and production facilities for local arts organizations,
  • Outdoor component for performances and special events
  • Food service capabilities.

In his study, Webb says the available market for a “Regional Centre” would include;

The Regional Districts of Fraser Fort George, the Cariboo, and the Bulkley Nechako, adding up to about 193 thousand people. If the Peace Region is added in, that boosts the market size to just over 250 thousand people.  He says the market is large enough to  support  a  Performing Arts Centre.

Webb’s  study  not only  dealt with  potential user groups, but examined the existing facilities.  His study  indicates the demand exceeds the  supply and that Prince George  could cash in on the  entertainment  travelling the highway 16 corridor.

 The inventory of existing facilities suggests the condition  of most is  fair, with only the  Treasure Cove Casino, the CN Centre,  the P.G. Civic Centre,  and Prince George Playhouse  scoring a "Good condition" rating.  There were NO facilities in Prince George listed as being in excellent condition.

Webb looked at several facilities in comparable communities, including the Port Theater in Nanaimo, the Sagebrush Theater in Kamloops, Kelowna Community Theater, and the River Run Centre in Guelph Ontario.

Webb says the benefits of  such a centre are numerous as  such a facility could  be a positive for downtown and  would be another step towards  economic diversification and increased cultural tourism, catalyst for downtown economic development, and  provide new opportunities for  education.

Webb  says the next step in the process will start next month  and that will  begin the preliminary facility programs and a capital cost estimates for a  facility. Then, there will be site selection for one or more sites,  followed by a business plan.  All that work will be completed  in the next 4-5 months.  "We're not waiting to the very end to find out what the price tag's going to be, we need to  see what is appropriate for the community of Prince George."  He says that could mean renting existing spaces, phasing in the development, "There are lots of options."

Webb says the trend today is moving away from the "cultural palace" and a cluster of buildings may be the way to go as  he says they are less "elitist".

Webb says  the  construction of  new facilities won't hurt existing  facilities "Thee is more demand than facilities, so this won't hurt anything that already exists".  While the   price tag has yet to be  established,  Webb  says  this kind of project can   find  what he calls " new pots of money". 

In his list of  possible "partners", he named  the University, the College and the School District,  which all rely on  tax payer dollars.

Tomorrow evening, Consultant Duncan Webb  will be available to present the material to the public.  That meeting is set  to take place at the  Prince George Public Library  at 7:30 in the evening in the Keith Gordon room..

    


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

A referendum is in order here.
Let the taxpayers decide.
Lets see what democracy can accomplish.
We have all had enough of Parliamentary dictatorships running our country, province and city.
Food service capabilities.
Does that mean we are all going to rush out there and pay $4.50 for a freakin hotdog like we do at the multiplex?
Multiplex food service is absolutely terrible. lets also have the same crap served in our new PAC
Would you have that attitude if it was for a ice rink or a soccer field? Open your mind a bit.
A referendum WOULD be in order!
and another and another....untill it was passed.
Can't argue with that 80shovel...seen it happen many times!
Those who don't believe a PAC is in order should try to book Vanier hall after April 15 next year. Can't get it for the remainder of the school year, or over the summer months during summer holidays. (Vanier Hall is first and foremost a school classroom and lecture hall, NOT a community facility).

The present facilities are simply not adequate, their condition is fair to OK, their availability is low and they're aging.

This is NOT about building something we don't need in this city.
Posted by: opinionated on March 31 2008 11:31 PM
Would you have that attitude if it was for a ice rink or a soccer field? Open your mind a bit.

Yes I would have the same attitude and my mind is more open than most.

80shovel you have a valid point there, we have all seen it before.

Bohemian writes
"
The present facilities are simply not adequate, their condition is fair to OK, their availability is low and they're aging.

This is NOT about building something we don't need in this city."

Yes it is about something we don't need in this city.

However this IS about the pure and simple fact that we have other priorities that our tax money needs to be spent on that will benefit everyone that lives here or passes through here. It's called infrastructure.
Mayor and city council needs to be figuring ways to reduce our taxes and efficient ways to spend the Bounty they already collect from us.
As it is now all they are doing is figuring how they can spend money we don't freakin have. Including repairs to my vehicles due to pothole damage.
I don't have anymore for you so stop asking. You make me sick.
Get a freakin job.

Get the point???
A new PAC IS a form of infrastructure improvements, and is also a piece of the downtown improvement puzzle that we're all crying about. No, it's not "THE" answer, just another piece of the puzzle. The 20% of the public that got off their asses and voted in the last civic election have exercised their democratic right to have these politicians make this kind of decision. If you don't like it, then cast your vote for a new councillor next election, but remember, the voters are never wrong, so you can either respect the democratic process or not, but that's our current political system. I'm not aware of a better alternative.
A new PAC IS a form of infrastructure improvements, and is also a piece of the downtown improvement puzzle that we're all crying about.

LMAO ok Buzz.
Your perception of infrastructure is a little different than most others.
I have no idea who you are referring to when you say " we're all crying about."
But I think the majority don't give a rats patooty about what happens with the downtown, if we all did then it would have been done 20 years ago.
People don't vote people into office so they can make bad decisions, when I vote it is with the hope that whomever gets elected will have a sane mind enough not to make idiotic decisions. When those we vote into office are making idiotic decisions it is our duty as THE PEOPLE to make our voices heard in oppositon to those BONEHEADED decisions. It would be rediculous to just elect them into office then close our eyes and ears, would it not?
Infrastructure can be defined as:

"the basic physical and organizational structures and facilities (e.g., buildings, roads, and power supplies) needed for the operation of a society or enterprise"

Seems pretty basic to me that a PAC would qualify. It may not be the type of infrastructure that some people want the budget going towards, however, it's silly to suggest that it wouldn't qualify as such.

As much as I'd like to see a new PAC, I think the more important question is whether we should invest in it IMMEDIATELY or say within the next 5 years. The fact that the City should have a such a facility at some point in time if it wishes to grow or remain competive with other similar sized cities is a complete no brainer IMHO.
I agee NMG that the PAC is an important piece of the infastructure pie and a possible 5 year plan is a good idea.
Some on this post and many at City hall have forgotten or have not heard how bad this city's image is. This image problem will not be fixed with the creation of a PAC...we already have many facilities that are the envy of other cities. We all know what forms of infastructure improvements would help our image. I would rather see 15+ million dollars of trees planted and grass grown.
Two Words: Pot Holes
I just watched a show on history channel about a world with no humans... it was kind of neat to see what happens to a city after 5-years, 10,20,30,100, and 150-years after and how the city was taken over by trees and animals until it almost resembled a jungle.... What difference would a PAC make in that kind of situation I wonder? It seems that is the way the downtown is going anyways and I'm not sure PAC is the solution.
Just curious then...what is the answer for downtown?
Just curious then...what is the answer for downtown?
Well i guess if Pg is ever going to get better it needs to build,attract and clean up the image that we now are known for!
Well Buzz cold fusion has not been proven to actually exist however good old normal nuclear fusion does.