Clear Full Forecast

Dredge Out A Channel Through Cottonwood Island To Prevent Flooding- Now That's a Novel Idea

By Ben Meisner

Monday, July 07, 2008 03:45 AM

The progress report on the Flood Risk Evaluation and Flood Control Solutions Risk Analysis is laughable. It cannot be described in any other manner.

On January 1st, 2008 I, along with a couple of hoe operators, took a serious look at the Nechako River and how we might prevent further flooding of the river due to the ice jam.

The solution was very simple, open up the side channel through Cottonwood Island Park and allow the water to go around the ice jam and back into the Fraser. We can’t do it came the cry from the City Brass; we don’t have permission from the Federal Fisheries to do that kind of work. Well they all know that I did get a hold of the DFO and, to their credit, within 45 minutes they had given the okay to begin dredging that section of the river with a view to sending the water around the jam.

Cost of that advice, nothing, cost of getting the DFO on board, two phone calls, but no cost to the city, zero, I paid for them.  Now we are being told at great cost to the province (and we the taxpayers) that, Hey! This is an option, how about we dredge the river through Cottonwood Park and around the jam. Wow, is that some forward thinking. But low and behold it even took some serious new flooding before the logs and the bridge were removed from that channel. The River was trying to tell us something but the experts knew different.

But just think had we sent a couple of hoes down to dig out that side channel there would have not been a serious flood along River Rd. and anyone who would suggest otherwise  is dreaming.

I raised the issue again on January 7th-2008 in an editorial.   

I asked at the time  about how much money would be burned up making that side channel deeper and wider , 20 to 25 thousand would do the job I was told.

I asked the city and the Engineers to consider this move because of the risk of a new ice jam forming and really creating a flood. Well guess what happened, we had a new ice jam and this time we had a real flood in the area, and yet we continued to use the finger in the ice jam to fix the problem.

It is no surprise that we are now being told that a good idea would be to create a side channel capable of carrying the water around the confluence of the Fraser and Nechako. My God I think my dog could have come up with that idea back at the end of December last year and now we are about to be told that dredging the mouth of the river would be of little benefit . Again advice without the benefit of any common sense.

We just don’t seem able to accept the fact that this city has dropped the ball on the flood event of 2007-08 so many times that it is no longer a joke. It is about time that we applied some common sense to the matter which to date has been sadly lacking.

I’m, Meisner and that’s one man’s opinion.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Amen to that Ben.. Everyone involved with this disaster should be sent down the road. It's sad to have such incompetence on the citys payroll.
Politicians/bureaucrats/government in general, they just want to cover their behinds. If they accept the advice of a layman, they are exposing themselves to potential risk and embarrassment. It is too bad that common sense is so tragically uncommon these days. We have a lot of people cashing in (and why not?) on the government requirement for 'expert' advice. ('X' is an unknown quantity, and spurt is a drip, under pressure) Something about the words 'public accountability' has the poli's running scared, and unable to make a decision.
metalman.
Ben, you don't think anyone at city hall is about to take any advice from anyone that they are not paying thousands of taxpayers dollars to, do you?

Your absolutely right in saying they have dropped the ball on this issue. Now they are scrambling around in the dark on all fours looking for it.
It got washed away along with all the lumber, tires, coils, logs, garbage and stuff we can't see with naked eye......(maybe..we'll see what is left once water is low again) lostfaith :)
"Something about the words 'public accountability' has the poli's running scared, and unable to make a decision. "

Nightmare scenario: Those in charge are paralyzed with fear to make a wrong decision...or their thinking is so deep in a rut that they can't see the real world over the top of the rut anymore.

Scary.
This is a report. Of course it will have those types of solutions. Any reasonable report of that nature should. As Ben has pointed out, it is not rocket science.

What went wrong in the whole thing over the winter, as i see it anyway, is the inability of those in charge of emergency measures to be able to take actions in emrgency situations. They were unsure of the raction of DFO or assumed reactions of DFO based on nornmal planning timelines. That is not what they were dealing with.

So, to me it looks like the right people were not at the table in emergency times to make decisions based on the best interests of affecterd people and their property, including the property of all of us, the park.

That is what needs to be fixed!! Who is working on that?
------------------------------

BTW, who is working on getting the other emergency situation here fixed. All that chemical garbage some people may have been breathing in as a result of the NCP plant fire? And waht would have happened ahd the wind been going in a different direction with inadequate venting. In other words, what would have happened on an inversion day? Were we prepared for that? Are we prepared for that?
Some of these assinine "experts" are more interested in their egos than in solving the problem. The mayor himself can't see beyond his own nose on this issue. I can't figure out why he seems to think we have to spend spend spend to make it look like appropriate action is being taken when in the end it is causing further havoc and grief to business and residents - not to mention burdening cash strapped taxpayers.

This is probably the worst fiasco I have ever witnessed. If it wasn't for Heidi and the little ambiphex that could the mayor would still be doing photo ops saying, "well that is nature for you". The buffoonary is appaulling!
Maybe heidi is up for leading the way. I would actively support a group that will physically go out, dredge and clean up what the officials can't seem to do properly! How about it heidi?
:)
I like to dig...makes my nerves feel just super!!!!!!!!!
Will I get arrested? You ready for me lmorg???

:)~

We just have to persuade the river that there's no reason to cut a new path through our space. If we let it run it's course look at all we'll be losing. Sad. IMO.

Thanks for that tiny :)
Night, night.
If I remember correctly the city called in an outside consultant expert who after much technical analysis and soul searching had no solution either. He certainly had never given any indication whatsoever that he was even aware of the existence of the Amphibex...as soon as the city found out about it the decision was made to hire it, though.

And, it DID work!