Council Passes Code of Conduct
Prince George, B.C.- The new Code of Conduct put before the Council of the City of Prince George, hass been approved. Each and every Councillor present ( Councillor Brian Skakun was absent) said they were prepared to put their signatures to the document which sets the guidelines for how Council is expected to treat staff and each other.
Here is the full document:
Council Code of Conduct
Purpose and Application:
The residents of the City of Prince George are entitled to have a fair, ethical and accountable municipal Council that has earned the public’s full confidence for integrity. The purpose of this Code is to establish guidelines for the ethical and interpersonal conduct of members of Council (“Members”).
The public expects a responsive local government with the highest standards of professional conduct from Members elected to it. Honesty, integrity, objectivity, due diligence and accountability are some of the core ethical values reflected in this Code. Members are expected to perform their functions of office faithfully and to the best of their knowledge and ability, in accordance with these core ethical values.
This Code applies to all Members of City Council.
1. Act in the Public Interest
Council shall act in the public interest by conducting its business with integrity, in a fair, honest and open manner.
2. Comply with the Laws
Members shall comply with all applicable federal, provincial, and municipal laws in the performance of their public duties, including but not limited to: the Local Government Act, the Community Charter, the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, the Financial Disclosure Act, and all applicable City bylaws and policies.
3. Conduct of Members
The conduct of members in the performance of their duties and responsibilities with the City must be fair, open and honest. Members shall refrain from abusive conduct, personal charges or verbal attacks upon the character or motives of other members of Council, committees, the City staff or the public.
4. Respect for Process
Members shall perform their duties in accordance with the policies and procedures and rules of order established by the City Council governing the deliberation of public policy issues, involvement of the public, and implementation of policy decisions of the Council by City staff.
5. Conduct of Meetings
Members shall prepare themselves for meetings, listen courteously and attentively to all discussions before the body, and focus on the business at hand. Members shall not interrupt other speakers, make personal comments not germane to the business of the body, or otherwise interfere with the orderly conduct of a meeting.
6. Decisions Based on Merit
Members shall base their decisions on the relevant merits and substance of the matter at hand, including input received from City staff and the public.
7. Sharing Substantive Information
Subject to paragraph 10, members shall share with Council substantive information that is relevant to a matter under consideration by the Council, which they may have received from sources outside of the public decision-making process. If a member has a concern regarding whether the information received should be shared, the member shall first consult with the City Manager or Director of Legislative Services.
8. Conflict of Interest
Members shall familiarize themselves and act in accordance with the provisions set out in the conflict of interest sections of the Community Charter.
9. Gifts
Members must not, directly or indirectly, accept a fee, gift or personal benefit that is connected with the member's performance of their duties, except in accordance with the provisions of the Community Charter.
10. Confidential Information
Members shall respect the confidentiality of information concerning the property, personnel, legal affairs, or other information of the City distributed for the purposes of, or considered in, a closed Council meeting. Members shall neither disclose confidential information without proper authorization, nor use such information to advance their own or anyone’s personal, financial or other private interests. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, members shall not disclose Council resolutions or staff report contents from a closed meeting of Council unless and until a Council decision has been made for the information to become public, and shall not disclose detail on Council’s closed meeting deliberations or how individual members voted on a question in a closed meeting.
11. Use of Public Resources
Members shall not use City public resources such as staff time, equipment, supplies or facilities, for private gain or personal purposes. Specifically, members shall not undertake municipal election campaign related activities at City Hall or on other premises owned by the City during regular working hours, unless such activities are organized by the City (e.g. all-candidate information sessions). Members shall not use City-owned equipment, technology or other property for municipal election campaign work (e.g. photocopiers, computers, etc.).
12. Advocacy
Members shall represent the official policies or positions of the City Council to the best of their ability when designated as delegates for this purpose. When presenting their individual opinions and positions, members shall explicitly state they do not represent Council or the City, nor shall they allow the inference that they do.
13. Policy Role of Members
Members shall respect and adhere to the Council-City Manager structure of municipal government as practised in the City. In this structure, the Council determines the policies of the City with the advice, information and analysis provided by the City staff and Council committees. Members therefore shall not interfere with the administrative functions of the City or with the professional duties of City staff, nor shall they impair the ability of staff to implement Council policy decisions.
14. Positive Work Place Environment
Members shall treat other members, the public and City staff with respect and shall be supportive of the personal dignity, self-esteem and well being of those with whom they come in contact with during the course of their professional duties. Comments about City staff performance shall only be made to the City Manager through private correspondence or conversation.
POLICY
15. Member Questions/Inquiries to City Staff
Member’s requests for information from staff shall be directed to the City Manager, a Director, or the Superintendent of Operations. If the response constitutes more than a technical clarification, then the response shall be provided to all Members so that all members have access to the same information.
16. Implementation
As an expression of the standards of conduct for members expected by the City, this Code is intended to be self-enforcing. This Code therefore becomes most effective when members are thoroughly familiar with it and embrace its provisions. For this reason, this Code shall be provided as information to candidates for Council. Members elected to Council shall be requested to sign a member statement affirming they have read and understand this Code, and that they agree to conduct themselves in accordance with it.
17. Compliance and Enforcement
This Code expresses standards of ethical conduct expected for Members of Council. Members themselves have the primary responsibility to assure that these ethical standards are understood and met, and that the public can continue to have full confidence in the integrity of the governance of the City.
The City will not retaliate against Members or City staff who, in good faith, report a known or suspected violation of this Code. No reprisals or threat of reprisals shall be made against such a complainant, or against anyone for providing relevant information in connection with a suspected violation of this Code. Members shall respect the integrity of this Code and the enforcement of it.
City Council may impose sanctions on members whose conduct does not comply with this Code, including but not limited to a motion of censure.
To ensure procedural fairness, a member who is accused of violating any provision of this Code shall have a minimum of two weeks, or the time between two consecutive Council meetings, whichever is greater, to prepare his or her response to these allegations. Specifically, before considering a sanction, Council must ensure that a member is provided with:
1. a copy of a written report setting out the alleged breach of this Code, and possible sanctions that may be considered against him or her;
2. a minimum of two weeks, or the time between two consecutive meetings, whichever is greater, to prepare a response against any allegations and possible sanctions; and
3. an opportunity to make representations and be heard by Council.
A violation of this Code shall not be considered a basis for challenging the validity of a Council decision.
Comments
HAHAHAHAHA. Most of these codes have been compromised already.
Positive Work Place Environment
“Members shall treat other members, the public and City staff with respect and shall be supportive of the personal dignity, self-esteem and well being of those with whom they come in contact with during the course of their professional duties. Comments about City staff performance shall only be made to the City Manager through private correspondence or conversation.”
Well that thing is Clearly not worth the paper its printed on LOL!! Most disrespectful Mayor in the history of PG!!!
This code of conduct contradicts itself, on one hand it insists council will “act in the public interest by conducting its business with integrity, in a fair, honest and “OPEN” manner.”
Yet later on, it goes into great detail on being secretive and not being open as follows:
“members shall not disclose Council resolutions or staff report contents from a closed meeting of Council unless and until a Council decision has been made for the information to become public, and shall not disclose detail on Councilâs closed meeting deliberations or how individual members voted on a question in a closed meeting.”
Yup, now all the important meetings can be closed meetings and we will never find out how the people we voted for, voted on closed meeting issues!
This Code of Conduct basically ties the hands of Councilors, and impedes their ability to communicate directly with different department heads.
As I stated earlier this year with the arrival of Ms James, it would only be a matter of time before we started to refer to her as **Stonewall James**
As Mayor Green stated when Council voted to keep Pine Valley.
**This doesn’t mean that some future Council could not sell Pine Valley**
Same thing applies to the Code of Conduct.
Some future Council could vote to amend it, or throw it out all together.
It going to become more and more difficult to determine what is going on at City Hall.
If our Councilors are not kept up to speed, and informed as to what is taking place at City Hall, then why do we have them. We shouldn’t have to wait weeks, or months to get information on projects, or other City business.
If Councilors are going to be regimented in how they can access information at City Hall, then you can rest assured that the General Public will also be restricted.
I hope it is the intention of Council to have this Code of Conduct apply to City Managers, with the proviso if they violate any part of the code they will subject to dismissal.
Obviously the idea is to have any information go through the city managers office ,through the laundry ( 3 or 4 communications wizards ) then spun on to us citizens. ( at a huge cost to us )
Right on Palopu….now council members will have to show up to their meetings with a personal lawyer to advise them how to act and speak (extra cost to the city of coarse) account the code is full of traps….Green and James are serving up some strange cool aid these days and council save Skakun is drinking of it…..no wonder we are in such a mess in little Pr George :(
15. Member Questions/Inquiries to City Staff
“Memberâs requests for information from staff shall be directed to the City Manager, a Director, or the Superintendent of Operations. If the response constitutes more than a technical clarification, then the response shall be provided to all Members so that all members have access to the same information.”
My take on this is any of the ‘members’ (sounds like a little club) that want to ask a question need to go through only one of three possibilities. Maybe all three, but the three posted in #15 are the ones that are the biggest spin Dr.’s. Why would the ‘members’ not be able to talk to their ‘subjects’ ahemmmm…. ‘staff’ directly? Total dictatorship.
Also, it refers explicitly to council. Should it actually say and be spelled out mayor AND council? We can’t just assume that it does.
I says “PARDON ME”??? Gifts?…. Conflict of interest?…. I am in absolute shock right now. Wow…I know what it feels like to get rolled by my municiple gov…I would rather get hit by a city bus at this point. Are you kidding me,,,can we not do something as a city about this? Another sad day in pg and now I know why I hate Mondays.
I agree, this city is being run and lead more and more by managers like Beth James, who takes over operations and micro manages it, giving the cold shoulder to our elected representatives.
Open and honest government it is not, just look at Brian Skakun’s thwarted attempts at getting additional information on issues brought before council… denied every time. Too much time they say, too expensive they say, when it comes to getting that information.
More and more, Green and James are building their power based empire… we can do something about replacing Green in the next election, but a new mayor and council will need to show James the door!
Every one should read and google “Every thing I learned in kindergarten” It so applies to this monkey mess. I thought Rob Ford was a mess…..This is an absolute crap show. I tell very few ppl where I am from, because I am embarrassed.
Don’t be embarrassed willyj. The current mayor and council ARE NOT a true representation of what and who PG really is. Soon Green will be gone and hopefully her successor will start the city on the path of what it could be.
Hopefully the crap we have had to deal with will lead to a record turnout in the polls come November. I wonder if she will even bother running again? She has to know that she has no way of getting voted in again.
Another joke show by council and mayor. PG is embarrassing. Bye bye Green.
Cue JB to come on here and tell you all you are bunch of whiners, because he believes politicians should be listened to beyond reason.
So if the city is on strike and not paying wages will we be getting a refund on our taxes with the money they are saving?
Wouldn’t it be a lot easy to build a big sandbox and have a bunch of 5 year olds watch to make sure everyone plays nice !!
Oh Oh someone is in the poop. This was supposed to be released April 1st.
If all the taxpayers don’t whine or carry on if this “code of conduct” is not adhered to, can we all get a tax break? Let’s say $50 bucks off every tax bill for every rule broken? I could handle that.
How’s Skakun going to do with #2 and #10? Actually, I think he’s learned his lesson on that front.
Campaign donations a conflict of interest? Oh. I see. Only AFTER the election. Hmmmm.
Yes indeed, we will be getting transparency in our government…. NOT
or it will be so transparent we won’t be able to see what they are doing as it will be so well hidden behind screening veils….
the more time goes on the more I am convinced this council is the biggest joke PG has ever seen.
This otta keep them busy hiring lawyers and consultants to figure out exactly what this ” code ” means .
Hey , I,ve got an idea . How about clearing the snow off my street that’s been there a week !
This is full of obvious aspects of a fiduciary duty, and then spun to hide a nest of empire building by bureaucrats. Its a coup by administrators and those that work behind closed doors wielding the powers of government.
I wouldn’t sign it if I was ever elected. Right away #10, #13, and #15 are over reach and far to vague and dangerous to the proper flow of information, oversight, and decision making in a democratic system.
I don’t see the mayor mentioned in any of the 17 commandments – what gives?
How about having a citizens council draw up a code of ethics for them? and then have that same council enforce it?
It would make more sense.
Ill bite PG,
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/removing-water-fluoride-spiked-cavities-in-kids-dentists-say-1.1386931
“only to have the same mandates proven false by later science” and later proven true by dentists
I see your comment is allowed while my comments have been removed. Privilege of the editor. No problem. Google dental fluorosis and osteosarcoma in young males (bone cancer).
Wow, comments about fluoride in our drinking water under the topic; “Council Passes Code of Conduct”.
So I guess it’s alright for me to comment on what an A-Hole; James Moore is regarding his public statement about child poverty!
http://www.news1130.com/2013/12/15/child-poverty-watchdog-blasts-james-moore/
That this man has a connection to a Federal Conservative dominated Prince George is not surprising! This man, and his party are tools!
Comments for this article are closed.