Saving Energy And Money, UNBC At Top of Its Class
The light blue area on the monitor displays the electricity saved per day after the retrofit compared to before. Image courtesy UNBC
Prince George, B.C. _The “Green” university is chalking up some more energy saving rewards.
In less than four years, UNBC ‘s Energy Management program and some incentives from BC Hydro have combined to see the University of Northern BC save more than $375,000 in energy, and $145 thousand work of BC Hydro incentives.
The first round of savings come from the University’s switch to LED lighting. That switch alone saves the University more than $6,000 a year and saves enough energy to power six houses over the same period . Now the move is towards optimizing buildings. There are three phases to this portion of the program,
The first phase, investigation, was funded by BC Hydro. An energy efficiency expert visited the campus and generated a list of more than $200,000 worth of capital projects that could save UNBC $145,000 a year in electricity and heat.
“These projects will pay for themselves in 1.4 years, which is pretty incredible,” says Amanda Drew, UNBC’s Energy Technician. “We were only required to invest $90,000 under the terms of the program, but since all of the projects have such a quick payback, and we’ll see huge returns, it just makes sense to implement all of them.”
A number of projects were identified and are planned for the coming years:
- Optimizing the heating and ventilation systems of various buildings. Reducing how much air is pumped into a building lowers the energy demand required to heat or cool that excess air. Potential annual savings of $40,000.
- Refining air handling system programs. While weekly schedules are already in place for air handling units, some of the more unique buildings, such as the research labs, can be refined. Potential annual savings of $32,000.
- Adding occupancy sensors. If people are there, the air handler unit or lights will come on. Potential annual savings of $22,000.
- Optimizing water pumping. Reduce the amount of water and glycol pumped to match the demand for water and heat. Potential annual savings of $29,000.
- Improving heat recovery. Heat from lab building exhausts can be captured that would otherwise be exhausted. Potential annual savings of $22,000.
“We were already very efficient. The BC Hydro program is more of a tune-up than anything else,” explains Drew. “A lot of these measures make sense, but we didn’t have the capacity to implement them. That’s where this program helped; it provided resources to investigate how to make our systems even more efficient.”
Part of the reason UNBC is in a position to take advantage of the BC Hydro program is because it set aside $250,000 in an “Energy Conservation Revolving Loan Fund” in 2012 to pay for energy projects. The University uses money from this fund to pay for capital projects with 80% of the realized savings returned to the fund to repay that loan. Once the loan is repaid, those payments drop to 50% for the lifetime of project, growing the fund’s balance.
Comments
All very interesting, but I would like to see the whole calculation of true costs versus benefits (savings and quality benefits).
For example, LED lighting.
1. It has a quality of light component to it – better or poorer than incandescent or fluorescent that it replaced?
2. cost of any fixtures that may have had to be altered to accommodate the LED lights – such as fluorescent.
3. cost and benefit of LED lights + installation person.hours over the life of the lights.
4. cost/benefit to those providing subsidy
5. deviation of actual life of LED lights versus projected life of the lights at installation.
The graph is interesting. From the distance it appears that the peaks and valleys are daily cycles with the lower peaks being on weekends. Or, perhaps, those two peaks visible were holidays.
I would have thought that weekends were busier.
What makes me curious is that if the curve represents peak hourly bins, the savings appear to be at the valleys, or overnight times of the daily cycles. I cannot see any substantial savings at the peak periods of the day. There are some savings appearing in a couple of peaks locations, but nowhere to the extent of the savings in the valleys.
I have a theory or two, but would rather have someone from UNBC explain it.
Comments for this article are closed.