No Tax Exemption for Global Logistics Park
Prince George, B.C.- A request from the developers of the Prince George Global Logistics Park for a tax exemption, has been rejected by Council, but it was a split decision.
In the request, the developer noted the lands adjacent to the Abbotsford Airport are tax exempt.
The report from City Staff, outlined the Abbotsford lands are owned by the City of Abbotsford and not private property as is the case with the Global Logistics Park adjacent to the Prince George Airport.
The staff report notes the City has taken a number of steps to make light industrial lands near the airport available including sharing in the costs of development of Boundary Road and Promotion of the light industrial lands.
The staff report indicates the sale of vacant light industrial land has been steady for the past 4 years, and there are several major industrial rezoning and subdivision applications before the City. “The data presented suggests the industrial marketplace in Prince George is currently very active. Anecdotal evidence from discussions with landowners, owner-operators, developers, and real estate agents further support the evidence, as there is considerable interest in the industrial marketplace, from both local and external participants” reads the report.
The report says the lands in question have not yet been fully developed, so the market has not been fully tested, therefore staff recommended the request for a tax exemption be denied.
Councillor Albert Koehler supports the tax exemption, saying investors are now looking for an incentive. “For us, it is to get companies here, get people here to settle here, to increase the tax base.” He says he sees nothing wrong with offering a tax exemption “and potential investors if they know about it, will probably come here.”
Councillor Lyn Hall says “It may not be right today, but it may be right 6 or 8 months down the road” he wanted to know if this could be “held in abeyance” for a time.
“We could absolutely diarize this to come back in three years or if the market conditions change to have a discussion around that” says City Manager Beth James.
Mayor Green did not agree, saying putting this item on hold, only leaves potential investors wondering if they can hold on for a while to see if they can get a better deal. She says there needs to be certainty on the matter.
Director of Development and Planning, Ian Wells says he spoke with the property owner recently and explained the staff thoughts against the idea of a tax exemption “And he didn’t indicate he had any concerns with this.”
Councillors Dave Wilbur, Cameron Stolz, Lyn Hall , Garth Frizzell and the Mayor supported the recommendation that no tax exemption be allowed at this time.
Councillors Brian Skakun, Frank Everitt and Albert Koehler voted against the recommendation. Councillor Murry Krause was absent.
Comments
Rather than have a double standard, give all the businesses a tax break. I think its illegal to not charge some businesses while
charging the hell out of others.
The city already paid for a third of the cost to build the road and put in services. To the tune of around 6 million dollars. The subsidy has already happened. An extra subsidy at this pint would be silly.
It wasn’t the city’s money that paid for a large chunk of this road, it was ours!
Us poor taxpayers have subsidized this private venture with not only our city tax dollars but also millions of tax dollars from the province.
What the hell is Koehler thinking? On one hand he says he wants to keep our taxes low and then on the other hand he has no problem championing for tax breaks for private developers which of course would drive our taxes up! Nice political double speak or maybe just ignorance as to how things work.
Amazing but the mayor actually got this one right. The private developers already got a huge tax benefit to build the road that set the stage for them to make millions selling the property so it would be foolish to give them another tax break or as the Mayor says, leave them thinking there might be a chance down the road.
I am amazed that Brian supports giving this private developer a tax break but then again I seem to recall he did get a fair bit of cash in his last election from the property owner. And they say money doesn’t buy influence.
Some developers think they are now entitled to tax breaks, as if they are doing this solely for our benefit and not for theirs.
I’ll agree to tax breaks for areas like the downtown core, which need stimuli like this, but not for a brand new industrial park. If developers don’t want to touch this site until there’s something more in it for them, then they should step aside and let someone else have a crack at it, someone who sees enough of a return on their investment.
PG has been a “have not” city for so long, some people are hoping that we’re stuck in that same train of thought.
Maybe a bit off topic but why spend all this money on a road that borders the airport without giving us a shorter/better route to the terminal?
Comments for this article are closed.